mixins

I can replace this code with <div class="row"> <div class="span10">...</div> <div class="span2">...</div> </div> With this, to make it more semantic <div class="article"> <div class="main-section">...</div> <div class="aside">...</div> </div> <!-- Less stylesheet --> .article { .makeRow(); .main-section { .makeColumn(10); } .aside { .makeColumn(2); } } How can I do this with the fluid grid though: <div class="row-fluid"> <div class="span10">...</div> <div class="span2">...</div> </div> <!-- Less stylesheet --> .article { ??? .main-section { .makeColumn(10); } .aside { .makeColumn(2); } } I

I'm looking for ideas on how to implement a Mixin/Trait style system in AS3. I want to be able to compose a number of classes together into a single object. Of course this is not a language level feature of AS3, but I'm hoping that there is maybe some way to do this using prototype based techniques or maybe some bytecode hacking that I believe AsMock uses to implement it's functionality. An existing Java example is Qi4J where the user define interfaces that the Qi4j framework implements based on metadata tags and coding by convention. Has anyone any ideas on how to get the Mixin/Trait concept

Within my latest grails 2.3.0 project I'm using the @Mixin annotation to mixin a helper class to keep my controller more DRY. The mixin is just working if a made some changes within the controller to force a recompile of the controller. After the initial compile ( grails run-app ) the helper isn't mixed in - I get a MissingMethodException trying to access a method from the helper class. Here is my helper witin src/groovy : class ProjectHelper { def withProject(id, Closure c) { def project = Project.get(id) if (project) { c.call project } else { flash.message = 'Project not found!' render view:

I've written a very simple Sass mixin for converting pixel values into rem values (see Jonathan Snook's article on the benefits of using rems ). Here's the code: // Mixin Code $base_font_size: 10; // 10px @mixin rem($key,$px) { #{$key}: #{$px}px; #{$key}: #{$px/$base_font_size}rem; } // Include syntax p { @include rem(font-size,14); } // Rendered CSS p { font-size: 14px; font-size: 1.4rem; } This mixin works quite well, but I'm a bit unsatisfied with the include syntax for it. See, I would much rather pass a pixel value into the include statement instead of a simple number. This is a small

I have this: class GenericCharacterFieldMixin(): attributes = serializers.SerializerMethodField('character_attribute') skills = serializers.SerializerMethodField('character_skill') def character_attribute(self, obj): character_attribute_fields = {} character_attribute_fields['mental'] = {str(trait_item.get()): trait_item.get().current_value for trait_item in obj.mental_attributes} character_attribute_fields['physical'] = {str(trait_item.get()): trait_item.get().current_value for trait_item in obj.physical_attributes} character_attribute_fields['social'] = {str(trait_item.get()): trait_item.get

Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post . Closed 4 years ago . I have understood the basics of decorators and mixins. Decorators add a new functionality to an object without changing other object instances of the same class, while a mixin is a kind of multiple inheritance used to inherit from multiple parent classes. Does it mean that decorators should be used when you'd need to modify only a single object instance and use

I want to to extend a trait within a trait, like this: trait NodeTypes { trait Node { def allNodesHaveThis: Int } } trait ScrumptiousTypes extends NodeTypes { trait Node extends super.Node { def scrumptiousness: Int } } trait YummyTypes extends NodeTypes { trait Node extends super.Node { def yumminess: Int } } object Graph extends NodeTypes with ScrumptiousTypes with YummyTypes { case class Node() extends super.Node { override def allNodesHaveThis = 1 override def scrumptiousness = 2 // error: ScrumptiousTypes.Node has been disinherited override def yumminess = 3 } } If this works, it would be