microdata

Typical LocalBusiness Website Microdata structure

有些话、适合烂在心里 提交于 2019-12-12 05:37:05
问题 I have a Website that typically describes an Organization/LocalBusiness/FurnitureStore and what it sells: brands (not owned), product categories, single products (not owned), service categories and single services (owned). I need help to define the best/correct microdata structure for the whole website. I would like to help a simple, clear example/tutorial for dummies. Each WebPage has the following structure: A. header - FurnitureStore: logo , name , nav . B. main C. footer - FurnitureStore

Is this proper Schema.org/Microdata markup for a building?

青春壹個敷衍的年華 提交于 2019-12-12 03:53:59
问题 I am trying to add Microdata notation (using Schema.org) to my website which basically talks about buildings. I’ve been reading a lot about it but I’m still having trouble figuring out where to use itemscope , itemtype and itemprop . Can anybody tell me if this is good Microdata/Schema.org markup or if I’m missing something? <div class="infobox infobox_building" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/LandmarksOrHistoricalBuildings"> <!-- Building Name --> <h1 class="page_title">Puente Golden

Can I use multiple instances of http://schema.org/Organization?

我的梦境 提交于 2019-12-12 01:26:21
问题 I have a website which list multiple companies, my markup goes something like this: <h2>Checkout those cool companies</h2> <div itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/Organization"> <img itemprop="logo" src="logo1.jpg" alt=""> <h3 itemprop="name">Company1</h3> <p itemprop="description">It's a great company</p> <span itemprop="url">http://company1.com</span> </div> <div itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/Organization"> <img itemprop="logo" src="logo2.jpg" alt="">

Using itemprop without itemtype

岁酱吖の 提交于 2019-12-12 00:08:03
问题 If I understand it correctly, it is possible to use itemprop without itemtype . Is this true? If so, what's the difference in terms of SEO? Is it better to use it with itemtype ? I am guessing yes, obviously, but what if the Microdata is not equal to the site you have? For example, I have a dictionary and I could use book, but would this be a good thing to do? I don't know how Google will see this. It would be not fine to get a penalty because of bad use. So: Do I have to use schema.org

Microdata itemref - multiple references to the same item

自古美人都是妖i 提交于 2019-12-11 21:08:58
问题 I have an item that I am trying to reference from several other items on my page and I am struggling to get this right, hopefully someone can enlighten me. One of several attempts is this: <div id="daughter"> <span itemprop="name">Mary</span> </div> <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person"> <span itemprop="name">John</span> <meta itemprop="children" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemref="daughter"/> </div> <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person"> <span

Issue with structuring breadcrumbs

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-12-11 20:57:42
问题 I have the following html to structure my breadcrumbs: <ul class="browsePageBC"> <li class="product-breadcrumb" itemscope="" itemtype="http://data-vocabulary.org/Breadcrumb"><a href="/Wanita" itemprop="url" alt="" title="Wanita"><span class="product-breadcrumb-title" itemprop="title">Wanita</span></a><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-right"></span></li> <li class="product-breadcrumb" itemprop="child" itemtype="http://data-vocabulary.org/Breadcrumb"><a href="/Wanita/Aksesoris" itemprop=

Google now supporting new version of Schema.org BreadcrumbList?

不想你离开。 提交于 2019-12-11 14:39:32
问题 It appears as though Google has now implemented Schema.org version 2 and Google's own examples fail Google's validation test. For example, here's is Google's example JSON-LD code for breadcrumbs: <script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "item": { "@id": "https://example.com/arts", "name": "Arts" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "item": { "@id": "https://example.com

Error: “Incomplete microdata with schema.org” (Review)

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2019-12-11 13:50:00
问题 I'm getting the error when I try to post Review Microdata for a product. I'm wondering what properties are required I have tried several different ways of arrange the data. This is what Google gives me: Item type: review property: name: Some reviewer author: Item 1 reviewrating: Item 2 reviewbody: "The body" Error: Incomplete microdata with schema.org. Item 1 type: person property: name: some Person Item 2 type: rating property: worstrating: 1 bestrating: 5 ratingvalue: 5 回答1: I just got this

Microdata in XHTML 1.1: there is no attribute “itemprop”

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-12-11 13:35:58
问题 I added Microdata to the product pages of my site. That leads to some errors. One of these errors is the following: there is no attribute "itemprop" The error is related to this source code line: <div itemprop="offers" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/Offer"> My Doctype is as follows: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> How would it be possible to make the page W3C compliant when keeping the same Doctype? 回答1: Microdata can

HTML image map as SiteNavigationElement

杀马特。学长 韩版系。学妹 提交于 2019-12-11 12:09:17
问题 I’m planning to use an HTML image map as a schema.org SiteNavigationElement . The idea is to use the image as a venue map and as a visual aid to find local business in my area. The code was validated through the Google Structured Data Testing Tool and everything seems to be ok. <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/SiteNavigationElement" > <div itemprop="name">the name</div> <div itemprop="description">the description</div> <img itemprop="image" src="map.jpg" usemap="#map_tag"/> <map