microdata

Linking independent elements in Microdata

由 可紊 提交于 2019-11-29 12:31:19
I'm creating a site about an author. He is the main-topic. On this site his written books are shown, too. Unfortunately, I can't find a solution to link these books to the main person-element. I tried itemref , but it doesn't work when linking to such 'independent' element, which has no itemprop value (says the Google testing tool). Both following "book"-cases don't work. <div id="author" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person"> <span itemprop="name">Marvin</span> </div> <div itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/Book"> <span itemprop="name">Nice Book</span> <meta itemprop="author"

Microdata on tables

由 拜拜、爱过 提交于 2019-11-29 06:58:47
I’m new to Microdata and have a problem with itemscope within a table . For example assume I‘ve got a person object and in the table I’m showing Name, Street and City columns. <table> <tr itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person"> <td itemprop="name">Name</td> <td itemprop="streetAddress">123 main</td> <td itemprop="addressCountry">USA</td> </tr> </table> Note that the streetAddress and addressCountry are supposed to be children of an address property. Yet you can not add a parent div to group those within the table . Further it doesn't appear that dot notation works, e.g. address

The correct approach to markup “keywords” of a blog post by using HTML5 and Microdata?

由 牧云@^-^@ 提交于 2019-11-29 05:05:50
The keywords property from Schema.org, as it being in plural form suggests, seems to imply its value should be a line of comma-separated text . Like the following example: <p itemprop="keywords">lorem, ipsum, dolor, sit, amet</p> That reminds me of the <meta name="keywords" content="lorem, ipsum, dolor, sit, amet"> tag we used to put within <head></head> for SEO reason. However, from semantics' perspective, I think the above example is incorrect because keywords should be a list of words . Thus it should be markuped by using the <ul> element. Is there a common consensus on how the keywords of

How do I relate items in schema.org?

由 非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2019-11-29 01:40:33
Suppose I have this simple HTML page about a guy getting a job: <!DOCTYPE HTML> <html> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>New Job for John Doe</title> </head> <body> <h1>New Job for John Doe</h1> <p>This week John Doe accepted an offer to become a Software Engineer at MITRE. John graduated from MIT in 2005 with a BS in Computer Science. He previously worked at a small company near Boston. Blah, blah, blah.</p> <p>The MITRE Corporation is a not-for-profit organization chartered to work in the public interest. The MITRE Corporation has two principal locations: Bedford, Massachusetts, and

HTML5 Microdata - itemref to another itemscope (Person works for Organization)

由 送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-11-28 18:47:53
The website of an organization, say "Sun Industries", would like to add a list of employees. The address and contact information of the organization is already present at the webpage, but the list of employees would be somewhere else. So we have <div id="organization" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Organization"> <span itemprop="name">Sun Industries</span>, <span itemprop="location" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place"> <span itemprop="address" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/PostalAddress"> <span itemprop="streetAddress">Technologies Street 42</span>, <span itemprop=

Microdata or JSON-LD? I'm confused

由 我的梦境 提交于 2019-11-28 16:49:23
I haven't found a clear and updated answer, even after googling for a few hours, so here it goes: I am aware of the advantages and disadvantages of both Microdata and JSON-LD. I also know that Microdata was dropped from W3C (and consequently from the browsers' API). What I'm not sure about is that how it will affect any site where Microdata is used specifically for SEO purpose. Does Google support JSON-LD for SERPs? What format does it recommend to use? I am looking for updated answers - not from 2011 or 2012 (if they are still applicable though, feel free to post it). What is more appropriate

What microdata should I use for a blog?

由 ＊爱你＆永不变心＊ 提交于 2019-11-28 16:42:20
问题 The blog is basically a page that lists the summary of like 10 articles, each item title linking to the full article page. I've seen: http://schema.org/Blog http://schema.org/Article (or maybe http://schema.org/BlogPosting ?) Where do I use these? Right now on the individual article page I have: <article itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"> <h1 itemprop="name"> <a href="..."> A title... </a> </h1> <div itemprop="articleBody"> bla bla </div> ... </article> Which is ok I guess, but

microformats, rdf or microdata

由 喜你入骨 提交于 2019-11-28 15:39:24
问题 Is there any difference between using one of this technologies? I'm building now a site using HTML5, and I'm having hard time to decide which one of them to use. I cannot see any difference between them, else the syntax size, which I'm not quite sure is an advantage for the microformats side. 回答1: *Edit, May 2015: Times have changed... again . Schema.org seems the way to go, using either microdata (W3C note) or RDFa (W3C recommendation), where the RDFa Lite variant is easiest to learn.

Schema.org Organizational markup Issue

由 余生颓废 提交于 2019-11-28 14:34:30
I was trying to implement this for my website: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.in/2013/05/using-schemaorg-markup-for-organization.html I have a quick doubt on this: Is it compulsory to tag existing visible on page elements on homepage?? say if we don't have a visible logo image on homepage, Can we add a separate logo image in a piece of code in body section as mentioned like : <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Organization" style="display:none;"> <a itemprop="url" href="http://myDomain.com/"></a> <img itemprop="logo" src="http://myDomain.com/logo.png" /> </div> So, if i add CSS

Google does not correctly merge microdata and json+ld in the same page using same URI id

由 微笑、不失礼 提交于 2019-11-28 14:30:54
I have a product page with "microdata" and "json+ld" codes. Both of the codes refers to the same @id URI object ( http://www.example.org/product#this ) so I would expect to "mix/merge" both properties, but instead structured data testing tool shows 2 "individual" products so.... 1- Does Google support using two syntax in the same page? 2- Is this well implemented? Can I refer two codes to the same object using itemId for microdata and @id for json+ld? 3- Can this damage my page in terms of structure data indexing? thanks You can check it out using this code in test tool : <div itemscope
订阅 microdata