merge-conflict-resolution

how does exactly a git merge conflict happen?

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-11-29 21:24:11
I have made a git repository and added a text file to it. This is 100% for learning purpose. I added "1" to the text file and committed it to master. Created a new branch from master and appended "2". Finally, created a branch from master and appended "3". Could you please explain how a conflict may occur in this, or any other, scenario? VonC You will have a conflict if you merge: branch2 to master (no conflict) branch3 to master (conflict): That is because: The common ancestor would be master (with a second line empty) the source content is branch3 (with a second line including "3") the

Git resolve conflict using --ours/--theirs for all files

不羁岁月 提交于 2019-11-29 18:54:39
Is there a way to resolve conflict for all files using checkout --ours and --theirs ? I know that you can do it for individual files but couldn't find a way to do it for all. Just grep through the working directory and send the output through the xargs command: grep -lr '<<<<<<<' . | xargs git checkout --ours or grep -lr '<<<<<<<' . | xargs git checkout --theirs How this works: grep will search through every file in the current directory (the . ) and subdirectories recursively (the -r flag) looking for conflict markers (the string '<<<<<<<') the -l or --files-with-matches flag causes grep to

How to interactively (visually) resolve conflicts in SourceTree / git

拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-11-29 18:54:14
I'm using (Windows) SourceTree for my git project. I can do it in either command prompt or Linux terminal. But, I'm wondering whether there is a nice way to interactively and visually resolve conflicts. For example, if pull detects conflicts, popping up a GUI-based conflict tool (e.g., P4Merge). Is it possible? I am always doing manual conflict resolving, which is just painful. This is, for example, a git pull message, from SourceTree. git -c diff.mnemonicprefix=false -c core.quotepath=false pull --no-commit origin master From W:\repo\ * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD Updating 33c07bf..41e0249

GIT corrupt files (<<<<<<<<HEAD)

佐手、 提交于 2019-11-29 17:15:26
问题 I have this in my files after some trouble with VS2012 git-plugin: using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting; <<<<<<< HEAD using NHibernate; ======= >>>>>>> dd2c3d7dfe81074e7c5a73f8e4ca2584481a74f1 namespace Controll.Hosting.Tests { [TestClass] public class TestBase { <<<<<<< HEAD protected ISessionFactory SessionFactory; [TestInitialize] public void InitializeTestBase() { SessionFactory = NHibernateHelper.GetSessionFactoryForMockedData(); ======= [ClassInitialize] public void

Show conflict diff part of a merge

被刻印的时光 ゝ 提交于 2019-11-29 14:14:05
问题 I need to present to the team what changes I've made during conflict resolution of a merge. I know this is kind of hard, but I certainly believe it is possible somehow. I've tried already git show -m and git show -c . 回答1: Look at the hash (or tag) of the merge commit (the commit that has multiple parents) and do: git diff hash hash^1 hash^2 It will output a 3 way-diff of the changes. hash^ (or hash^1 ) references the first parent commit of hash hash^2 references the second parent commit of

Do I have to commit a merge to make git-rerere record my conflict resolution?

早过忘川 提交于 2019-11-29 11:29:22
问题 I'm using git-rerere for its intended purpose, to record conflict resolutions between two branches (master and a topic branch) incrementally as those branches develop, without creating unnecessary merge commits. However, even after reading the git-rerere manpage I'm a little unclear on when rerere actually records my conflict resolution. My standard workflow for detecting and resolving new merge conflicts is to do git merge master from the topic branch, resolve the conflicts, then stage all

How do I resolve conflicts with Git?

烈酒焚心 提交于 2019-11-29 08:31:10
问题 I have a pull request for which GitHub tells me "This branch has conflicts that must be resolved." I tried: ~/src/networkx: git rebase origin/master Current branch topo is up to date. ~/src/networkx: git merge origin/master Already up-to-date. 回答1: Actually... you don't have anymore to pull and rebase locally. You can resolve (simple) merge conflicts right form GitHub, since Dec. 2016. See "Resolve simple merge conflicts on GitHub " You can now resolve simple merge conflicts on GitHub right

Troubles with git and Gemfile.lock

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2019-11-29 02:13:06
问题 I keep running into the following error with my Gemfile.lock whenever I want to do a git pull or checkout a new branch. error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by merge: Gemfile.lock Please, commit your changes or stash them before you can merge. Aborting The problem is that I can't figure out how to fix it. Stashing the file doesn't work -- the local changes just stay there for some reason. I've also tried running git checkout -- Gemfile.lock to discard the

Visual Studio 2013 does not offer to do merge on Git pull

久未见 提交于 2019-11-28 23:40:43
问题 I'm working with Visual Studio 2013 Update 4 and git (hosted on Visual Studio Online). I have 2 local commits and 2 commits in remote branch. There are NO local changes to commit: When I try to do Pull (or Fetch) in Visual Studio, I get error: An error occurred. Detailed message: 1 conflict prevents checkout Yes, there is a conflict, I should do merge. And according to this page I should be offered a link to resolve conflict. But I don't see that in VS. I can do merge outside of VS, but that

Jump to next error / code highlighted in red

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-11-28 22:03:34
问题 When dealing with merge conflicts it is common that the >>>>>> and ====== inserted by DCVS are syntactically incorrect for the file I'm in and show up as highlighted in red. When dealing with merge conflicts it would be useful to have commands to jump to these error. When I type :cnext I just get the message "No Errors". These are Mercurial merge conflicts so I can't use Fugitive, but I generally prefer editing merge conflicts by hand anyway. Is there a way to jump to the next syntax error in