membership-provider

This question already has answers here : Migrating ASP.NET Membership Database to SQL Azure (3 answers) Possible Duplicate: Migrating ASP.NET Membership Database to SQL Azure How do I run aspnet_regsql on sql azure database? I made it work the hard way, by exporting all db objects over. However, I seriously believe that there's an easier way. Please help. AvkashChauhan When you run aspnet_regsql on sql azure database, the error occurs only because SQL Azure does not support the USE statement to switch database contexts when it executes commands against SQL Azure databases. To work around this,

what is the differences between Membership , SimpleMembership , ASP.NET Identity ? Which one is best in web forms? How to use SimpleMembership in web forms. Limitation with SimpleMembership in web forms. user2315985 You listed them in progressive order by age. The Asp.net Membership Provider was first introduced with .net 2.0. Later. Simple Membership was released but most recently Microsoft has replaced SimpleMembership with Asp.net Identity (Microsoft.Aspnet.Identity.Core). This article should help you understand... Forms authentication using ASP.NET Identity & VS 2013 Remember, there are

I have this code in my custom MembershipProvider: public override void Initialize(string name, System.Collections.Specialized.NameValueCollection config) { if (config == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("config"); if (name == null) name = "MyCustomMembershipProvider"; ... } Resharper marks the second if-Statement and tells me, it would always evaluate to false. But why would this always evaluate to false? I could easily pass null to the method as a parameter. Is this a bug or is Resharper right here? PS 1: I use Resharper 6.1 PS 2: I know using string.IsNullOrEmpty() would be the way to

I am trying out "SimpleMembership" in MVC3 via Nuget and have downloaded the sample to play with. The issue is that I cannot figure out how I would assign a role to a particular user. In the standard MVC membership you can just use something like: Roles.AddUserToRole(model.UserName, "StandardUser"); However, SimpleMembership only seems to have one method for roles exposed (unless Im being stupid!) which is public void RequireRoles(params string[] roles) { WebSecurity.RequireRoles(roles); } There must be an easy way as the following table was created as part of this nuget package: -TABLE:

is there any custom asp.net membership providers that someone has already created online. I want to use a custom provider because their role provider is very sluggish and I would like to use integers instead of guids for user IDs There can be no alternative implementations of the standard membership provider API, given that it is based on non-generic interfaces. However, in practice the whole membership API adds very little value and it is fairly easy to roll your own solution. To help you get started here are a few of the helper classes that I typically use. First, some code to deal with

I have a SQL script that creates users in in my database. It uses the .Net membership stored procs. At this point it works fine. The only issue is that the passwords are saved clear text. What should I change here to they are salted/encrypted (Not sure what term to use here) GO DECLARE @return_value int, @UserId uniqueidentifier EXEC @return_value = [dbo].[aspnet_Membership_CreateUser] @ApplicationName = N'Theater', @UserName = N'sam.sosa', @Password = N'mypassword', @PasswordSalt = N'eyhKDP858wdrYHbBmFoQ6DXzFE1FB+RDP4ULrpoZXt6f', @Email = N'sam@Simple.com', @PasswordQuestion = N'Whats your

So I'm trying to introduce the concept of a user to my application and have got my own set of custom login routines etc. working fine. In my module, I'm binding my IUserSession to my implementation and InSingletonScope. Now I suspect this was the case and have been able to prove that this is not the right thing to do, if I try and login with two users against the same site, I get only one set of data. If I implement a MembershipProvider, do I avoid such a restriction. I know that if I implement a membership provider, I don't have to inject everything, but my login isn't just a username