master

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: Coming from CVS, we have a policy that commit messages should be tagged with a bug number (simple suffix "... [9999]"). A CVS script checks this during commits and rejects the commit if the message does not conform. The git hook commit-msg does this on the developer side but we find it helpful to have automated systems check and remind us of this. During a git push, commit-msg isn't run. Is there another hook during push that could check commit messages? How do we verify commit messages during a git push? 回答1: Using the update hook You know

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have a class that manages user preferences for a large software project. Any class in the project that may need to set or retrieve a user preference from a persistent store is to call the static methods on this class. This centralized management allows the preferences to be completely wiped programmatically - which would be impossible if each pref was handled close to its use code, sprinkled throughout the project. I ran into another implication of the centralization design in the course of this. The software has a public API. That API can

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: I'm getting that error with a PR, but when I git status it says nothing to commit, working directory clean . That's on the branch with the PR. On branch pr12 nothing to commit , working directory clean 回答1: git status tells you about the state of your working directory tree and your index (where staged changes live) relative to the latest commit on the current branch. The output you're seeing means that the files on your disk exactly match the latest commit on your branch. That is, there's "nothing to commit". The message from

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I sometimes use the checkout -b option to create a new branch, check it out at the same time and set up tracking in one command. In a new environment, I get this error: $ git checkout -b test --track origin/master fatal: Cannot update paths and switch to branch 'test' at the same time. Did you intend to checkout 'origin/master' which can not be resolved as commit? Why does Git not like it? This used to work with the same repo. 回答1: ' origin/master ' which can not be resolved as commit Strange: you need to check your remotes: git remote -v

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: My English is not good enough to understand the explanation of git flow For my understanding. Master branch is for ready-product which can be downloaded on the market by users. But there is an release branches I have no ideas theses branches is release for whom ? Release for customers ? or for QA? http://www.flickr.com/photos/appleboy/5488984404/ 回答1: Once develop has acquired enough features for a release (or a predetermined release date is approaching), you fork a release branch off of develop. Creating this branch starts the next release

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: Stupid question and treat me as completely a newbie to version control. I'm new to Git (I've used subversion before, but just the basics) I understand the basics of Git and its branching commands, I have an imaginary situation that need your advice. Suppose my software currently is at v1.2, stable and released. My Software v1.0 v1.1 v1.1.1 v1.2 <- Current, Compilable and Released Scenario: I have two developers, John and Eric. John is responsible for bug fixes reported by clients. Eric is responsible for new features, experiment with them

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I am somewhat new to git, I've been using it for a number of months, and Im comfortable doing most of the basic tasks. So... I think its time to take on some more complicated tasks. At my work, we have a few people working on older code to update it, this involves actual code work and updating the directory structure to be more modular. My question is can these two things be done in parallel branches and then merged or rebased. My intuition says no, because dir restructure is a rename, and git renames by adding a new file and deleting the

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: After fetching from remote using git fetch , we need to use something like git merge origin/master I would like to know if this command also does git commit at the same time? Is the order origin/master important? Can I write master/original ? 回答1: git merge origin/master can do one of two things (or error). In the first case, it creates a new commit that has two parents: the current HEAD , and the commit pointed to by the ref origin/master (unless you're doing something funny, this is likely to be (the local pointer to) the branch named

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: There may be more than one way to ask this question, so here's a desciption of the problem. I was working on master and committed some stuff and then decided I wanted to put that work on hold. I backed up a few commits and then branched from before I started my crap work. Practically this works fine, I just now have a different branch as my main development branch. I'm wondering how I could change things around so I'm working on master again but it doesn't have my junk work and said work is on a different branch. Some ways this could be

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: We're currently in the process of implementing a CRM-like solution internally for a professional firm. Due to the nature of the information stored, and the varying values and keys for the information we decided to use a document storage database, as it suited the purposes perfectly (In this case we chose MongoDB). As part of this CRM solution we wish to store relationships and associations between entities, examples include storing conflicts of interest information, shareholders, trustees etc. Linking all these entities together in the most