loops

问题 Hello everyone here is my case: I'm crawling through the old page with more than 10 000 comments which I'm trying to import to WordPress. I'm using simple_html_dom.php library, which in this case is not important. What I'm doing is getting a URL with 24 first posts crawling through them and getting an element with comments. $url = 'http://xx/aktualnosci,wszystkie,0,'.$x.'.html'; //some URL with first 24 posts $html = file_get_html($url); $articlesCount = 0; $commentsCount = 0; foreach ($html-

问题 I have an image folder in my create-react-app project with a bunch of images. I want to display every single image in the components. ├── Components │ ├── Icons │ │ ├── Icon.jsx (I want to display every single icon) │ │ ├── Images │ ├── Icons │ │ ├── ... (over 100 SVG icons) In my .jsx file, I want to loop over every image/icon and display it. Icons.jsx import React, { Component } from 'react'; import Icons from '../../Images/Icons'; class Icons extends Component { render() { return ( //Loop

问题 I have an image folder in my create-react-app project with a bunch of images. I want to display every single image in the components. ├── Components │ ├── Icons │ │ ├── Icon.jsx (I want to display every single icon) │ │ ├── Images │ ├── Icons │ │ ├── ... (over 100 SVG icons) In my .jsx file, I want to loop over every image/icon and display it. Icons.jsx import React, { Component } from 'react'; import Icons from '../../Images/Icons'; class Icons extends Component { render() { return ( //Loop

问题 This question already has an answer here : Why the execution time of a million double-int conversion is the same as an empty loop? (1 answer) Closed 8 months ago . I know it's stupid, but I still have to ask this question because it's been bothering me for days. I use a variety of methods to test, but the results vary widely. The execution time of a million double-int conversions is the same as empty loop 回答1: Good and smart question. The Elapsed result of a StopWatch varies because modern

问题 This question already has an answer here : Why the execution time of a million double-int conversion is the same as an empty loop? (1 answer) Closed 8 months ago . I know it's stupid, but I still have to ask this question because it's been bothering me for days. I use a variety of methods to test, but the results vary widely. The execution time of a million double-int conversions is the same as empty loop 回答1: Good and smart question. The Elapsed result of a StopWatch varies because modern

问题 This question already has an answer here : Why the execution time of a million double-int conversion is the same as an empty loop? (1 answer) Closed 8 months ago . I know it's stupid, but I still have to ask this question because it's been bothering me for days. I use a variety of methods to test, but the results vary widely. The execution time of a million double-int conversions is the same as empty loop 回答1: Good and smart question. The Elapsed result of a StopWatch varies because modern

问题 I've got this code which reads an example file of /etc/passwd: #!/bin/bash OLDIFS=$IFS IFS=$'\n' while read linea resto do echo $linea echo $resto if [[ $(echo $linea | cut -d: -f6 | egrep -c 'al-03-04') == 1 ]] then finger $(cut -d: -f1) 2> fich if [[ $(egrep -c fich) == 1 ]] then echo $(echo $linea | cut -d: -f1). Inactive user else echo $(echo $linea | cut -d: -f1). Active user fi fi done < <(cat fichpasswd) IFS=$OLDIFS and this is the example file of /etc/passwd: jfer:x:5214:1007:Javier

问题 I have a loop with several If statements in Excel VBA. This goes through and hides certain rows based on certain criteria. Basicially, if one of the statements is true then the row is hidden. Since only one of the statements has to be true for the row to be hidden it would be pointless for the rest of the statements to be tested once one of the statements is found to be true. How would I put in a line of code that would say to move onto the next iteration of the loop once the if statement is

问题 The bounty expires in 5 days . Answers to this question are eligible for a +50 reputation bounty. Luke Poeppel is looking for an answer from a reputable source . I have a list that holds tuples that represent ranges of numbers. My goal is to return all (see the note below; really looking for the longest) possible subsets of this collection that overlap only by the second value in each tuple or not at all. The function I have been using is a recursive solution to this problem. def get_all_end

问题 So I have the following excel tabs: Code 1, Code 2, Code 3, LI, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, output for 2015 etc. For 2015, I have a table in '2015' tab with 10 rows a list of 3 code and their respective % values. e.g. ref name yr code 1 % code 2 % code 3 % 12345 NAME 2015 AB 50% CD 37% EF 13% 78901 NAME 2015 AX 54% OD 30% NG 6% 26572 NAME 2015 AE 60% CD 27% PF 13% I need the code 1 'AB' and % '50%' to be put into cells B5 and B6 in the tab Code 1. Same for codes 2 and 3 'CS' and '37%' in B5