libraries

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I'm now playing with LLVM and it's JIT. I'm pretty interested in the JIT and then I wrote a small GTK+ hello world: #include int main () { gtk_init(NULL, NULL); GtkWidget *win = gtk_window_new (GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL); g_signal_connect (win, "delete-event", G_CALLBACK (gtk_main_quit), NULL); GtkWidget *lbl = gtk_label_new ("hello world"); gtk_container_add (GTK_CONTAINER (win), lbl); gtk_widget_show_all (win); gtk_main(); return 0; } I compiled it into Bitcode this way: clang -emit-llvm -S a.c `pkg-config --cflags gtk+-3.0` llvm-link a.s -o a.o

I’ve been searching Google and Stack Overflow like crazy for days and have yet to find any recent, completely relevant information to answer the following question: What are the best C#/F#/.NET math libraries (specifically, those that wrap or implement the same functionality as Lapack, etc.)? One of the better posts on Stack Overflow that I did see was: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3227647/open-source-math-library-for-f The reason that that post, and other previous posts, didn’t sufficiently answer my question was that no systematic comparison of user experiences with various libraries

I'm sorta new to C++ and I've decided to try and use odeint to do some simulations because python is too slow for my needs. I found this package , which I want to play with. I'm just not totally sure how to install or where to place these libraries. Is there something for C++ similar to python's pip install ? Side note: I'm trying to do this using Eclipse Kepler , but I'm not married to that idea. I recommend not putting the code into your own project - that is a rather quick and dirty solution. The correct way to use a library in C++ (in fact, in any programming language that I know) is to

I am looking for libraries for Java that will allow me to create an interactive shell. I have done some search around and have not turned up a whole lot. Most of what I have found is libraries for adding command argument parsing to my application which does not help me a lot. The best lead I have found is a library called Cliche which does exactly what I need. The problem is its too simple. I am looking for something that has more customization. Has anyone come across something a little more advanced? Options to consider: javacurses / JCurses - a console-based windowing toolkit, similar to the

I am a big fan of Scala aesthetically, and of a lot of the conceptual work put into things like its typing system and libraries. However, as I have begun tinkering with Scala (and seen some of my coworkers tinker with it) i find myself having to dig for more and more Java knowledge (especially in the way of libraries). This presents me with a few problems: Having never been a Java programmer, i'm not familiar or comfortable with the Java standard library, or additional popular libraries (like Apache Commons). My google-fu in the Java-sphere is weak. It's hard to know what to search for – a

I have an Arduino Uno and a Linux environment. Though the Arduino IDE is great and all, however it doesn't give me much inputs if something goes wrong. And it also becomes excruciatingly slow and stops communicating with the chip sometimes. The alternative is to code my Arduino Uno using the AVR-GCC/g++ and AVRDude toolchain. However, I would very much like to have access to the same functions as in Arduino (like Serial , digitalWrite , etc.) while programming using a simple text editor and command line tools. So I tried to find the header file with all the functions defined ie "Arduino.h" in

I have python code that needs to do just a couple simple things to photographs: crop, resize, and overlay a watermark. I've used PIL, and the resample/resize results are TERRIBLE. I've used imagemagick, and the interface and commands were designed by packaging a cat in a box, and then repeatedly throwing it down a set of stairs at a keyboard. I'm looking for something which is not PIL or Imagemagick that I can use with python to do simple, high-quality image transformations. For that matter, it doesn't even have to have python bindings if the command line interface is good. Oh, and it needs to

I already have Python source files for some custom tasks. Can I create a custom library of these tasks as keywords and use in the Robot Framework? Bryan Oakley Yes, you can. This is all documented fairly extensively in the Robot Framework user guide, in the section titled Creating test libraries . You have a couple of choices. You can use your module directly, which makes every method in the module available as a keyword. This is probably not what you want since the library probably wasn't designed to be used as a collection of keywords. Your second choice is to create a new library that