levenshtein-distance

Percentage rank of matches using Levenshtein Distance matching

只愿长相守 提交于 2019-11-28 20:20:21
I am trying to match a single search term against a dictionary of possible matches using a Levenshtein distance algorithm. The algorithm returns a distance expressed as number of operations required to convert the search string into the matched string. I want to present the results in ranked percentage list of top "N" (say 10) matches. Since the search string can be longer or shorter than the individual dictionary strings, what would be an appropriate logic for expressing the distance as a percentage, which would qualitatively refelct how close "as a percentage" is each result to the query

Best machine learning technique for matching product strings

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-28 17:03:35
问题 Here's a puzzle... I have two databases of the same 50000+ electronic products and I want to match products in one database to those in the other. However, the product names are not always identical. I've tried using the Levenshtein distance for measuring the string similarity however this hasn't worked. For example, -LG 42CS560 42-Inch 1080p 60Hz LCD HDTV -LG 42 Inch 1080p LCD HDTV These items are the same, yet their product names vary quite a lot. On the other hand... -LG 42 Inch 1080p LCD

Fuzzy matching of product names

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-11-28 16:01:16
I need to automatically match product names (cameras, laptops, tv-s etc) that come from different sources to a canonical name in the database. For example "Canon PowerShot a20IS" , "NEW powershot A20 IS from Canon" and "Digital Camera Canon PS A20IS" should all match "Canon PowerShot A20 IS" . I've worked with levenshtein distance with some added heuristics (removing obvious common words, assigning higher cost to number changes etc), which works to some extent, but not well enough unfortunately. The main problem is that even single-letter changes in relevant keywords can make a huge difference

Fuzzy search algorithm (approximate string matching algorithm)

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-11-28 15:31:58
问题 I wish to create a fuzzy search algorithm. However, upon hours of research I am really struggling. I want to create an algorithm that performs a fuzzy search on a list of names of schools. This is what I have looked at so far: Most of my research keep pointing to " string metrics " on Google and Stackoverflow such as: Levenshtein distance Damerau-Levenshtein distance Needleman–Wunsch algorithm However this just gives a score of how similar 2 strings are. The only way I can think of

Difference between Jaro-Winkler and Levenshtein distance? [closed]

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-11-28 15:12:26
I have a use case where I need to do fuzzy matching of millions of records from multiple files. I identified two algorithms for that: Jaro-Winkler and Levenshtein edit distance. When I started exploring both, I was not able to understand what the exact difference is between the two. It seems Levenshtein gives the number of edits between two strings, and Jaro-Winkler gives a matching score between 0.0 to 1.0. I didn't understand the algorithm. As I need to use either algorithm, I need to know the exact differences with respect to algorithm performance. Levenshtein counts the number of edits

Implementing a simple Trie for efficient Levenshtein Distance calculation - Java

你。 提交于 2019-11-28 14:10:46
问题 UPDATE 3 Done. Below is the code that finally passed all of my tests. Again, this is modeled after Murilo Vasconcelo's modified version of Steve Hanov's algorithm. Thanks to all that helped! /** * Computes the minimum Levenshtein Distance between the given word (represented as an array of Characters) and the * words stored in theTrie. This algorithm is modeled after Steve Hanov's blog article "Fast and Easy Levenshtein * distance using a Trie" and Murilo Vasconcelo's revised version in C++. *

R: String Fuzzy Matching using jarowinkler

孤街浪徒 提交于 2019-11-28 10:21:15
I have two vector of type character in R. I want to be able to compare the reference list to the raw character list using jarowinkler and assign a % similarity score. So for example if i have 10 reference items and twenty raw data items, i want to be able to get the best score for the comparison and what the algorithm matched it to (so 2 vectors of 10). If i have raw data of size 8 and 10 reference items, i should only end up with a 2 vector result of 8 items with the best match and score per item item , match , matched_to ice, 78, ice-cream Below is my code which isn't much to look at.

Implementing Levenshtein distance in python

心不动则不痛 提交于 2019-11-28 06:52:31
问题 I have implemented the algorithm, but now I want to find the edit distance for the string which has the shortest edit distance to the others strings. Here is the algorithm: def lev(s1, s2): return min(lev(a[1:], b[1:])+(a[0] != b[0]), lev(a[1:], b)+1, lev(a, b[1:])+1) 回答1: Your "implementation" has several flaws: (1) It should start with def lev(a, b): , not def lev(s1, s2): . Please get into the good habits of (a) running your code before asking questions about it (b) quoting the code that

How do you implement Levenshtein distance in Delphi?

孤人 提交于 2019-11-28 05:02:19
I'm posting this in the spirit of answering your own questions. The question I had was: How can I implement the Levenshtein algorithm for calculating edit-distance between two strings, as described here , in Delphi? Just a note on performance: This thing is very fast. On my desktop (2.33 Ghz dual-core, 2GB ram, WinXP), I can run through an array of 100K strings in less than one second. function EditDistance(s, t: string): integer; var d : array of array of integer; i,j,cost : integer; begin { Compute the edit-distance between two strings. Algorithm and description may be found at either of

MySQL Mixing Damerau–Levenshtein Fuzzy with Like Wildcard

本秂侑毒 提交于 2019-11-28 01:55:14
问题 I recently implemented the UDFs of the Damerau–Levenshtein algorithms into MySQL, and was wondering if there is a way to combine the fuzzy matching of the Damerau–Levenshtein algorithm with the wildcard searching of the Like function? If I have the following data in a table: ID | Text --------------------------------------------- 1 | let's find this document 2 | let's find this docment 3 | When the book is closed 4 | The dcument is locked I want to run a query that would incorporate the