key-value

GWAN Key-Value persistent store

二次信任 提交于 2019-12-07 19:24:49
问题 I want to use the GWAN API Key-Value to record and read a number of data (in a multi-threaded way). The problem is that my recordings are only available on the current page and therefore can not be used on my other pages. Can you show me an example or explain how to create a persistent KV store (which will be accessible on all my subdomains) ? Here is an example that I currently use: kv_t store; kv_init(&store, "users", 10, 0, 0, 0); kv_item item; item.key = "pierre"; item.klen = sizeof(

Loop over object's key/value using TypeScript / Angular2 [duplicate]

僤鯓⒐⒋嵵緔 提交于 2019-12-07 07:16:32
问题 This question already has answers here : How to get all properties values of a Javascript Object (without knowing the keys)? (22 answers) Closed 3 years ago . How can I iterate over a Object using TypeScript and being able to access key and value? My json object looks something like this: { "clients": { "123abc": { "Forename": "Simon", "Surname": "Sample" }, "456def": { "Forename": "Charlie", "Surname": "Brown" } } } The clients object to be filled is made of client models looking like:

How to use field value as key name in Mongodb result

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-12-07 05:56:56
问题 Can somebody tell me please if is possible to use field value as key in mongodb result. If I have documentes like {'code': 'xxx', 'item': 'yyy'} {'code': 'ooo', 'item': 'eee'} I would like to get result where code value will be the key like {'xxx': 'yyy'}, {'ooo': 'eee'} 回答1: You have to use $arrayToObject if you want to build your keys dynamically. It takes an array of k and v fields as a parameter. To make it root you can use $replaceRoot stage, try: db.col.aggregate([ { $replaceRoot: {

How to load variables in a “bar=foo” syntax in CMake?

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2019-12-07 05:21:36
问题 It is nice to be able to share the same file between a Makefile and shell scripts due to the fact that they both can cope with the following syntax for key-value pairs: $> cat config var1=value var2=value var3=value var4=value var5=value So, just a source config from a shell script will be fine, as well as include config from a Makefile . However, with CMake the syntax becomes SET(var1 value) . Is there some easy way that I can feed CMake with a file with variables using the syntax of above?

How to sum values of the same key in a dictionary?

杀马特。学长 韩版系。学妹 提交于 2019-12-06 19:39:27
Supose my dictionary: mydict = [{"red":6}, {"blue":5}, {"red":12}] This is what I've done so far: for key, value in mydict() : if key == mydict.keys(): key[value] += value else: print (key, value) I don't think I'm getting it quite right (been stuck for hours), but I want the output to look like this: blue 5 red 18 or red 18 blue 5 I do not recommend this since it results a messy design: class MyDict(dict): def __setitem__(self, key, value): if key in self: super().__setitem__(key, self[key] + value) else: super().__setitem__(key, value) >>> d = MyDict({'red': 6, 'blue': 5}) >>> d['red'] = 12

TreeMap<String, Integer> object's get method return null value

妖精的绣舞 提交于 2019-12-06 12:23:32
import java.util.*; public class Sort { static class ValueComparator implements Comparator<String> { Map<String, Integer> base; ValueComparator(Map<String, Integer> base) { this.base = base; } @Override public int compare(String a, String b) { if (base.get(a) >= base.get(b)) { return 1; } else { return -1; } } } public static void main(String[] args) { HashMap<String, Integer> map = new HashMap<String, Integer>(); ValueComparator vc = new ValueComparator(map); TreeMap<String, Integer> sorted = new TreeMap<String, Integer>(vc); map.put("A", 1); map.put("B", 2); sorted.putAll(map); for (String

how to shuffle key-value pairs?

北战南征 提交于 2019-12-06 10:33:17
I have a set of values which need to be shuffled when needed. I don't know which variable type is best for me. Data is actually based on key-value structure.Like; 100 "white" 200 "black" 300 "red" and like that. What I want to do is to change the key-value pairs according to I don't know yet, some algorithm.But they need to be shuffled like this, but shuffling need to be not random , so I can revert data when I need. 100 "red" 200 "white" 300 "black" I don't really know how my approach should be to the solution. Should I use HashTable or something, and how can I shuffle them dynamically? Any

Java Project: Make HashMap (including Load-Store) Performance Better

十年热恋 提交于 2019-12-06 07:48:38
问题 I am trying to code for our server in which I have to find users access type by URL. Now, at the beginning, we see 100 millions distinct URL's are accessed per day. Now, by the time going it became nearly 600 millions distinct URL's per day. For 100 millions, what we did is following: 1) Building a HashMap using parallel array whose key are URL's one part (represented as LONG) and values are URL's other part (represented as INT) - key can have multiple values. 2) Then search the HashMap to

Is there a nosql store that also allows for relationships between stored entities?

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2019-12-06 07:20:21
问题 I am looking for nosql key value stores that also provide for storing/maintaining relationships between stored entities. I know Google App Engine's datastore allows for owned and unowned relationships between entities. Does any of the popular nosql store's provide something similar? Even though most of them are schema less, are there methods to appropriate relationships onto a key value store? 回答1: It belongs to the core features of graph databases to provide support for relationships between

Easy way to set javascript object multilevel property?

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-12-06 07:07:50
问题 I am trying to create a javascript object like var allUserExpiry={}; allUserExpiry[aData.userId][aData.courseId][aData.uscId] = aData; But I am getting an error like allUserExpiry[aData.userId] undefined. Is there a way, whereby I can set multi-level JS-Object keys? or is it important that I should go by doing allUserExpiry[aData.userId]={} , then allUserExpiry[aData.userId][aData.courseId]={} ? Please let me know if there are any utility functions available for the same. 回答1: No, there is no