jslint

I notice that in CoffeeScript, if I define a function using: a = (c) -> c=1 I can only get the function expression : var a; a = function(c) { return c = 1; }; But, personally I often use function declaration ,for example: function a(c) { return c = 1; } I do use the first form, but I'm wondering if there is a way in CoffeeScript generating a function declaration. If there is no such way, I would like to know why CoffeeScript avoid doing this. I don't think JSLint would holler an error for declaration, as long as the function is declared at the top of the scope. CoffeeScript uses function

What does JSLint mean by this error? And how should it be rewritten? Error: Problem at line 78 character 3: Move the invocation into the parens that contain the function: })(jQuery); To pass JSLint's criteria, it needs to be written like this: }(jQuery)); Though I think that particular criteria is a bit subjective. Both ways seem fine in my opinion. (function () {})() makes a bit more sense to me since you wrap the full function, then call it (function () {}()) looks like you're wrapping the result of the function call in a parens ... 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4979252/jslint

I used JSLint on a JavaScript file of mine. It threw the error: for( ind in evtListeners ) { Problem at line 41 character 9: The body of a for in should be wrapped in an if statement to filter unwanted properties from the prototype. What does this mean? vava First of all, never use a for in loop to enumerate over an array. Never. Use good old for(var i = 0; i<arr.length; i++) . The reason behind this is the following: each object in JavaScript has a special field called prototype . Everything you add to that field is going to be accessible on every object of that type. Suppose you want all

I have some third party javascript im working with, I added some jquery code into it the javascript file. But it seems to fail on the above code when validating using Jslint '$' was used before it was defined. I can see at the top of the javascript file it states: /*global alert: false, console: false, jQuery: false */ Im relatively new to Javascript, and JQuery, so any help would be welcome. kernel Add these options to your comments: /*jslint browser: true*/ /*global $, jQuery, alert*/ If you want to use variables provided by other scripts, then you need to say so: /*global $ */ For JSLint In

Having trouble understanding why JSLint is surprised by my use of this in the following code: function testConstr (x) { 'use strict'; this.joker = "Whyyy sooo seriousss?"; this.x = x; } For both property assignments, JSLint says: Unexpected 'this'. How do I correct my code? Your code might be perfectly correct (it might also be problematic, depending on how you call testConstr ). My suggestion is: tell JSLint to shut up Or don't use JSLint at all. ruffin So in other words, JSLint doesn't automatically expect me to use a constructor pattern? You know, I think you're right. Your question bugged

I know that some people consider the presence of a leading underscore to imply that a variable is "private," that such privacy is a fiction, and assume this is why JSLint reports such names with an error message. I use Google Analytics on a Web site I am building. I make reference to GA's variables, such as "_gaq." I am trying to get my JS code to be 100% JSLint clean (I'm not religious about my coding style, and so will go with Mr. Crockford's counsel). That said, I can't do anything about Google's variables names... so, I guess I can't get 100% "clean." I post here in case I've misunderstood