java-web-start

I've created a NetBeans Platform application that is launched using Java Web Start. I built the WAR file using the 'Build JNLP Application'-command in Netbeans 6.8. I've added a desktop shortcut and menu item to the JNLP file, but for some reason, these are not created when the application is launched. However, when I go to: Control Panel -> Java -> Temporary Internet Files -> View -> Select my application > Click 'Install shortcuts to the selected application' the desktop and menu shortcuts are created correctly. Also, in the Java Console, the Shortcut Creation option is set to the following

Just tried to add some swingx-ws components to the overall swinglabs demos - and noticed that a simple JXMapKit/-Viewer is orders of magnitude slower to load the tiles in the webstartable compared to loading locally. Rather lost on where I should start looking (ui updates seem to be on the EDT, though might need a closer look): anybody else experiencing the different loading times? any guess on what might be the reason? how to debug a webstartable? The code is rather straightforward (to run locally, you'll need swingx and swingx-ws : public class WSDemo { private JComponent createContent() {

I'm going to migrate a Java Applet to be started via JNLP as a Java Web Start Application and run into some troubles/missunderstandings ... One of the resources I've got is this: 6 Migrating Java Applets to Java Web Start and JNLP: But let's start: Currently the application is an applet ( JApplet ) and was started in past by embedding into an HTML with the applet tag referring to a JNLP. Now since applet support was dropped by all browsers, I should run it as Java Web Start. Simply calling same JNLP failed as the resources (JAR files) couldn't be loaded. This was as a first step fixed by

Just sharing some information hoping that it would be useful to the community. Usability of Applets have gone down since various browsers stopped supporting plugins. Google has decided to discontinue support for NPAPI plugin, EDGE does not support plugins, Firefox is also discouraging use of plugins, and Mozilla may follow the suite. One of the applications we developed required use of Applets for the following reasons Ability to access ports and peripheral devices attached to computing devices Ability to exchange information with the web application (Through JavaScript) Noninvolvement of

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . I am creating a screencast Java Web Start application. Encoding Video using xuggler requires: installing xuggler on the client system - Which is tedious. (OR) Using xuggle-xuggler.jar version 5.2 or above whose size is around 35 MB plus. - this increases the time required for the application to load. Is there any other alternative in which installation is not required as well jars are not so huge. I

NB 7.4RC2, Win 7 In Java Control Panel, the "Keep Temporary Internet Files" checkbox is checked. I am signing my Web Start application with trusted certificates. However, the 3rd party jars in dist/lib seem to be unsigned. C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jdk1.7.0_40\bin\jarsigner" -verify javafx-dialogs-0.0.3.jar jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable) So when I run my application in the debugger, it refuses to start complaining of unsigned jars ExitException[ 3]com.sun.deploy.net.JARSigningException: Found unsigned entry in resource: file:/C:/Users/me/Documents/NetBeansProjects

It was just pointed out to me that the Java Web Start applications from my blog, for example my Key Bindings entry, no longer function because of the follow security error: Upon doing some investigation I have determined that security has been improved in JDK7 and that the default setting found on the Security Tab of the Java Control Panel found on the Windows Control Panel is set to High which prevents the app from running. If you do change this setting to Medium , then you have the choice to accept the app and it will run. I'm guessing most people will not want to do this, so it looks like I