intellisense

Visual Studio 2010 inserts a space between the keyword "function" and the following parenthesis. Is it possible to turn this off? i.e. Visual Studio formats my code like: var vsfn = function () { }; I would like this formatting: var myfn = function() {}; VS2010 sp1 introduced a new option: Insert space after function keyword for anonymous functions in Tools > Options > Text Editor > JScript > Formatting > Spacing . You can turn it off to get the desired behavior. You should find these settings here: Tools > Options > Text Editor > JScript > Formatting > Spacing 来源： https://stackoverflow.com

I currently have an extension method on System.Windows.Forms.Control like this: public static void ExampleMethod(this Control ctrl){ /* ... */ } However, this method doesn't appear on classes derived from Control, such as PictureBox. Can I make an extension method that appears not only in Control, but for classes derived from Control, without having to do an explicit cast? You must include the using statement for the namespace in which your extensions class is defined or the extension methods will not be in scope. Extension methods work fine on derived types (e.g. the extension methods defined

I have been using Visual Studio 2015 since CTP 6 and I have noticed that the IDE does not show the parameter list when I type the opening parenthesis "(". This is what I am expecting to see: In the screenshot above you see the the Create method has two overloads and this displays when I type the open parenthesis. But in Visual Studio CTP 6 and RC, nothing happens. I cannot see the overloads or the parameter list. Is this a bug? Is there anyway to fix this issue? Here's the answer: Go to Tools, Options, Text Editor, All Languages, General. Then check the following options (override 'mixed'

I updated ~/Scripts/_references.js with /// <autosync enabled="true" /> /// <reference path="angular.js" /> /// <reference path="angular-route.js" /> and in my app.js I can see some intellisense working, which is great but go a little further and it doesn't work anymore. Any ideas on why this happens or ways to make it work? Because you are using dependency injection , Visual Studio has no way to figure out what are the types of the arguments. This is a common problem with Javascript intellisense and, since Javascript does not allow for explicit type annotations, it seems that there is no

I know this has been discussed a lot of times but is there any nice how-to for c/c++ intellisense in emacs? I have never been able to set up cedet properly. Right now I am working on a maintenance project with a huuge code base and it is very difficult to manage without proper intellisense. Currently I am using vim with ctags/cscope and omnicomplete features for intellisense which works great; but I would like to get things to work with emacs. If you cannot get CEDET working, then you could use auto-complete.el combined with CTAGS or just words-in-buffer or words-in-all-buffers. For what it's

I'm learning NHibernate and I added <hibernate-configuration xmlns="urn:nhibernate-configuration-2.2"> to App.config . Visual Studio reported a message: Could not find schema information for the element 'urn:nhibernate-configuration-2.2:hibernate-configuration'. I know this is not a problem, but if VS knew the schema, IntelliSense would work. How can I add the schema? Just include the XSD files in any of your projects or as Solution Items. Copy the two .xsd from the folder Required_Bins from the NHibernate download to C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\Xml\Schemas. If you use other

I have an assembly containing very thorough XML-based documentation, which is used through Sandcastle to generate the help-files for the product. We also use the output XML files for providing proper Intellisense in Visual Studio when programmers use the assembly obviously. In order to do this, it seems we have do both supply the user with the assembly ("assembly.dll") and the documentation ("assembly.xml"). Is it somehow possible to embed the documentation within the assembly, so we'd only have to supply the single assembly-file and Visual Studio would be able to extract the information?