integer-overflow

Program behaving strangely on online IDEs

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-11-27 06:39:21
I have come across the below C++ program ( source ): #include <iostream> int main() { for (int i = 0; i < 300; i++) std::cout << i << " " << i * 12345678 << std::endl; } It looks like a simple program and gives the correct output on my local machine i.e. something like: 0 0 1 12345678 2 24691356 ... 297 -628300930 298 -615955252 299 -603609574 But, on online IDEs like codechef , it gives the following output: 0 0 1 12345678 2 24691356 ... 4167 -95167326 4168 -82821648 4169 -7047597 Why doesn't the for loop terminate at 300? Also this program always terminates on 4169 . Why 4169 and not some

Checking for underflow/overflow in C++?

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-11-27 05:25:47
Is there a general way to check for an overflow or an underflow of a given data type (uint32, int etc.)? I am doing something like this: uint32 a,b,c; ... //initialize a,b,c if(b < c) { a -= (c - b) } When I print a after some iterations, it displays a large number like: 4294963846. To check for over/underflow in arithmetic check the result compared to the original values. uint32 a,b; //assign values uint32 result = a + b; if (result < a) { //Overflow } For your specific the check would be: if (a > (c-b)) { //Underflow } I guess if I wanted to do that I would make a class that simulates the

What are arithmetic underflow and overflow in C?

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2019-11-27 01:49:40
问题 What do arithmetic underflow and overflow mean in C programming? 回答1: Overflow From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_overflow: the condition that occurs when a calculation produces a result that is greater in magnitude than that which a given register or storage location can store or represent. So, for instance: uint32_t x = 1UL << 31; x *= 2; // Overflow! Note that as @R mentions in a comment below, the C standard suggests: A computation involving unsigned operands can never overflow,

Unexpected results when working with very big integers on interpreted languages

安稳与你 提交于 2019-11-26 23:50:50
问题 I am trying to get the sum of 1 + 2 + ... + 1000000000 , but I'm getting funny results in PHP and Node.js. PHP $sum = 0; for($i = 0; $i <= 1000000000 ; $i++) { $sum += $i; } printf("%s", number_format($sum, 0, "", "")); // 500000000067108992 Node.js var sum = 0; for (i = 0; i <= 1000000000; i++) { sum += i ; } console.log(sum); // 500000000067109000 The correct answer can be calculated using 1 + 2 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2 Correct answer = 500000000500000000 , so I decided to try another language.

How do I get real integer overflows in MATLAB/Octave?

有些话、适合烂在心里 提交于 2019-11-26 22:51:27
I'm working on a verification-tool for some VHDL-Code in MATLAB/Octave. Therefore I need data types which generate "real" overflows: intmax('int32') + 1 ans = -2147483648 Later on, it would be helpful if I can define the bit width of a variable, but that is not so important right now. When I build a C-like example, where a variable gets increased until it's smaller than zero, it spins forever and ever: test = int32(2^30); while (test > 0) test = test + int32(1); end Another approach I tried was a custom "overflow"-routine which was called every time after a number is changed. This approach was

Overflowing of Unsigned Int

你离开我真会死。 提交于 2019-11-26 22:44:55
What will the unsigned int contain when I overflow it? To be specific, I want to do a multiplication with two unsigned int s: what will be in the unsigned int after the multiplication is finished? unsigned int someint = 253473829*13482018273; unsigned numbers can't overflow, but instead wrap around using the properties of modulo. For instance, when unsigned int is 32 bits, the result would be: (a * b) mod 2^32 . As CharlesBailey pointed out, 253473829*13482018273 may use signed multiplication before being converted, and so you should be explicit about unsigned before the multiplication:

How to check for signed integer overflow in C without undefined behaviour?

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-11-26 22:22:06
问题 There's (1): // assume x,y are non-negative if(x > max - y) error; And (2): // assume x,y are non-negative int sum = x + y; if(sum < x || sum < y) error; Whichs is preferred or is there a better way. 回答1: Integer overflow is the canonical example of "undefined behaviour" in C (noting that operations on unsigned integers never overflow, they are defined to wrap-around instead). This means that once you've executed x + y , if it overflowed, you're already hosed. It's too late to do any checking

Is the size of an array constrained by the upper limit of int (2147483647)?

江枫思渺然 提交于 2019-11-26 21:52:15
问题 I'm doing some Project Euler exercises and I've run into a scenario where I have want arrays which are larger than 2,147,483,647 (the upper limit of int in C#). Sure these are large arrays, but for instance, I can't do this // fails bool[] BigArray = new BigArray[2147483648]; // also fails, cannot convert uint to int ArrayList BigArrayList = new ArrayList(2147483648); So, can I have bigger arrays? EDIT: It was for a Sieve of Atkin, you know, so I just wanted a really big one :D 回答1: Anytime

Why do integer datatypes overflow silently rather than throwing exception

…衆ロ難τιáo~ 提交于 2019-11-26 21:51:15
问题 I have learnt(atleast in java) that integer/long values overflow silently and their values start over from minimum value on overflow rather than throwing any exception. I was using an external api for some file operations, in which max file size was being loaded from a property file. All was fine in my local testing environment. As soon as the code went to live environment, the max file size limit was not working at all. After two days of debugging/analyzing the code, there was no success at

Simulating integer overflow in Python

送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-11-26 21:50:51
问题 Python 2 has two integer datatypes int and long , and automatically converts between them as necessary, especially in order to avoid integer overflow. I am simulating a C function in Python and am wondering if there are standard ways to re-enable integer overflow. For the nonce, I've used overflow_point = maxint + 1 if value > overflow_point: value -= 2 * overflow_point Is there a more standard way to do the same thing? 回答1: I think the basic idea is sound, but needs some tweaks: your