integer-division

How to Calculate (a/b) %c where a,b and c are very large numbers [closed]

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-12-02 23:00:53
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 5 years ago . I have a function f(x)=(1^1)*(2^2)*(3^3)*.....(x^x) i have to calculate (f(x)/(f(x-r)*f(r)))modulo c i can calculate f(x) and (f(x-r)*f(r)). assume f(x) is a and f(x-r)*f(r) is b. c is some number that is very larger. `` so i how can calculate (a/b)%c 回答1: your f(x) is just ᴨ (PI cumulative multiplication)

Trouble with calling method [duplicate]

℡╲_俬逩灬. 提交于 2019-12-02 16:40:08
问题 This question already has answers here : Fahrenheit to Celsius conversion yields only 0.0 and -0.0 (5 answers) Closed 5 years ago . public static void main (String[] args) { for (double f=0; f<=20;f++) { System.out.println(f+":Degrees Fahrenheit converted to Celsius = "+ celsius(f)); } } public static double celsius (double fahrenheit) { double cels=(fahrenheit-32)/(5/9); return cels; } With this program I'm trying to convert Fahrenheit to Celsius, and when I call method Celsius to my main

C++ wrong result of mathematical expression [closed]

杀马特。学长 韩版系。学妹 提交于 2019-12-02 13:27:45
I have to calculate some simple mathematical expression, but when I do it in one row, the result always will be zero. But the correct result is obviously not zero. And its interesting but when I separate the parts of expression, I get the correct answer. Later I will divide with this result, so it should not be 0. The expression is like this: (X-X1)/(X2-X1) In this case the delta : 0 double delta = (x - x1) / (x2 - x1); But this way the delta will be correct: double top = x - x1; double bottom = x2 - x1; double delta = top/bottom; Do you have any idea, how could this happen? Mats Petersson

How to Calculate (a/b) %c where a,b and c are very large numbers [closed]

半腔热情 提交于 2019-12-02 13:16:35
I have a function f(x)=(1^1)*(2^2)*(3^3)*.....(x^x) i have to calculate (f(x)/(f(x-r)*f(r)))modulo c i can calculate f(x) and (f(x-r)*f(r)). assume f(x) is a and f(x-r)*f(r) is b. c is some number that is very larger. `` so i how can calculate (a/b)%c your f(x) is just ᴨ (PI cumulative multiplication) squared it is hard to write it in here so i will deifine g(x0,x1) instead g(x0,x1)=x0*(x0+1)*(x0+2)*...*x1 so: f(x)=g(1,x)^2 computing h(x,r,c)=f(x)/(f(x-r)*f(r))%c when you rewrite it to g() you get: h(x,r,c)=((g(1,x)/(g(1,x-r)*g(1,r)))^2)%c now simplify (and lower magnitude) as much as you can

Why byte and short division results in int in Java?

僤鯓⒐⒋嵵緔 提交于 2019-12-02 00:47:54
问题 In Java, if we divide byte s, short s or int s, we always get an int . If one of the operands is long , we'll get long . My question is - why does byte or short division not result in byte or short ? Why always int ? Apparently I'm not looking for the "because JLS says so" answer, I am asking about the technical rationale for this design decision in the Java language. Consider this code sample: byte byteA = 127; byte byteB = -128; short shortA = 32767; short shortB = -32768; int intA =

Efficiently dividing unsigned value by a power of two, rounding up - in CUDA

旧城冷巷雨未停 提交于 2019-12-01 22:10:02
I was just reading: Efficiently dividing unsigned value by a power of two, rounding up and I was wondering what was the fastest way to do this in CUDA. Of course by "fast" I mean in terms of throughput (that question also addressed the case of subsequent calls depending on each other). For the lg() function mentioned in that question (base-2 logarithm of divisor), suppose we have: template <typename T> __device__ int find_first_set(T x); template <> __device__ int find_first_set<uint32_t>(uint32_t x) { return __ffs(x); } template <> __device__ int find_first_set<uint64_t>(uint64_t x) { return

Why byte and short division results in int in Java?

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-12-01 21:50:15
In Java, if we divide byte s, short s or int s, we always get an int . If one of the operands is long , we'll get long . My question is - why does byte or short division not result in byte or short ? Why always int ? Apparently I'm not looking for the "because JLS says so" answer, I am asking about the technical rationale for this design decision in the Java language. Consider this code sample: byte byteA = 127; byte byteB = -128; short shortA = 32767; short shortB = -32768; int intA = 2147483647; int intB = - -2147483648; long longA = 9223372036854775807L; long longB = -9223372036854775808L;

Division in C# to get exact value [duplicate]

痞子三分冷 提交于 2019-12-01 21:17:08
This question already has an answer here: Why does integer division in C# return an integer and not a float? 7 answers If I divide 150 by 100, I should get 1.5. But I am getting 1.0 when I divided like I did below: double result = 150 / 100; Can anyone tell me how to get 1.5? try: double result = (double)150/100; When you are performing the division as before: double result = 150/100; The devision is first done as an Int and then it gets cast as a double hence you get 1.0, you need to have a double in the equation for it to divide as a double. Cast one of the ints to a floating point type. You

How to multiply a 64 bit integer by a fraction in C++ while minimizing error? [duplicate]

流过昼夜 提交于 2019-12-01 21:17:08
问题 This question already has answers here : Most accurate way to do a combined multiply-and-divide operation in 64-bit? (10 answers) Closed 5 years ago . Given a 64 bit (signed) long long or __int64 , how would you go about multiplying it by an arbitrary fraction while at the same time minimizing error? Three simple sketches: int64_t numerator = ...; int64_t denominator = ...; int64_t x = ...; // a, lossy double conversion for large values double fraction = static_cast<double>(numerator) /

Python 3 strange division

让人想犯罪 __ 提交于 2019-12-01 20:51:49
问题 About half an hour thinking "what am i doing wrong!?" on the 5-lines code.. because Python3 is somehow rounding big integers. Anyone know why there is a problem such: Python2: int(6366805760909027985741435139224001 # This is 7**40. / 7) == 909543680129861140820205019889143 # 7**39 Python3: int(6366805760909027985741435139224001 / 7) == 909543680129861204865300750663680 # I have no idea what this is. 回答1: Python 3 is not "rounding big integers". What it does is that it will return a float