instance

I have public static class A { public static string ConnString; } [Serializable] public class Test{ // Accesing A's field; public string ConnString{get{return A.ConnString;}set{A.ConnString=value;}} } void Main() { A.ConnString = "InitialString"; // I set A.ConnString in the current domain var newDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain("DomNew"); Test TObj = newDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap(typeof(Test).Assembly.FullName, typeof(Test).FullName) as Test ; TObj.ConnString = "NewDomainString"; // It is supposed to set A.ConnString in the newDomain aka a different instance of A.ConnString // Here it is

I meet one problem that i can't solve now. I have the following: UnityHelper.DefaultContainer.RegisterInstance(typeof(IMyInterface), "test", instance); where UnityHelper.DefaultContainer is my helper for getting unity container with loaded configuration. here I registered instance as an instance of IMyInterface . So anywhere( some time after using) I want to remove this mapping. Remove it at all. How I can do it? I have tried: UnityHelper.DefaultContainer.Teardown(instance) but is was unsuccessful and the following code returns instance anyway: UnityHelper.DefaultContainer.ResolveAll

I have a class like this public class TestData { public string Name {get;set;} public string type {get;set;} public List<string> Members = new List<string>(); public void AddMembers(string[] members) { Members.AddRange(members); } } I want to know if it is possible to directly compare to instances of this class to eachother and find out they are exactly the same? what is the mechanism? I am looking gor something like if(testData1 == testData2) //Do Something And if not, how to do so? Frederik Gheysels You should implement the IEquatable<T> interface on your class, which will allow you to

Currently, I am reading "JUnit in action" book. In this book I found text below: JUnit creates a new instance of the test class before invoking each @Test method. This helps provide independence between test methods and avoids unintentional side effects in the test code. Because each test method runs on a new test class instance, we can’t reuse instance variable values across test methods. Now I do not see much point in this approach: For example: public class CalculatorTest { @Test public void testAdd_1() { Calculator calculator = new Calculator(); double result = calculator.add(1, 1);

My teacher says that when I try to access an instance variable within a method I should always use the this keyword, otherwise I would perform a double search. A local scope search and then an instance scope search. Example: public class Test(){ int cont=0; public void Method(){ System.out.println(cont);//Should I use This.cont instead? } } I hope he is wrong, but I can't find any argument. No, only use this when you have a name conflict such as when a method parameter has the same name as an instance field that it is setting. It can be used at other times, but many of us feel that it simply

How can one check if a variable is an instance method or not? I'm using python 2.5. Something like this: class Test: def method(self): pass assert is_instance_method(Test().method) Tom Dunham inspect.ismethod is what you want to find out if you definitely have a method, rather than just something you can call. import inspect def foo(): pass class Test(object): def method(self): pass print inspect.ismethod(foo) # False print inspect.ismethod(Test) # False print inspect.ismethod(Test.method) # True print inspect.ismethod(Test().method) # True print callable(foo) # True print callable(Test) #