inequality

SQL Server RowVersion/Timestamp - Comparisons

邮差的信 提交于 2019-11-29 01:45:00
问题 I know that the value itself for a RowVersion column is not in and of itself useful, except that it changes each time the row is updated. However, I was wondering if they are useful for relative (inequality) comparison. If I have a table with a RowVersion column, are either of the following true: Will all updates that occur simultaneously (either same update statement or same transaction) have the same value in the RowVersion column? If I do update "A", followed by update "B", will the rows

Simple boolean inequality operators mistake

半世苍凉 提交于 2019-11-28 10:10:09
问题 Using inequality operators, I have to define a procedure weekend which takes a string as its input and returns the boolean True if it's 'Saturday' or 'Sunday' and False otherwise. Here is my code def weekend(day): if day != 'Saturday' or day != 'Sunday': return False else: return True This seemingly returns False to every day, I don't know why, logically it would work... Can anyone please explain? 回答1: Fixed version: if day != 'Saturday' and day != 'Sunday' Better version: return day in [

Using the correct, or preferable, not equal operator in MySQL

谁说胖子不能爱 提交于 2019-11-28 09:36:17
Which of the two (semantically equivalent) ways is preferable to test for inequality? 'foo' != 'bar' (exclamation mark and equals sign) 'foo' <> 'bar' (less than and greater than chevron symbols together) The MySQL documentation clearly indicates that there is no difference between them and yet some people seem to be attached to only doing it one way or the other. Maybe this is just another pointless vi vs. emacs debate but when other people are reading your code (and therefore your queries), it's useful to maintain some consistency. <> looks a lot like <=> which is a very underused operator

how to effectively run two inequality filters on queries in app engine

二次信任 提交于 2019-11-27 12:53:47
I'm aware that app engine has the restriction of "Inequality Filters Are Allowed On One Property Only" as described here: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/queriesandindexes.html#Introducing_Indexes However is there some way to essentially run two filters, or is this simply not possible? For instance, if I had an entity kind that simply had an X and Y coordinate, and I wanted all entities that are within a certain range of X1 to X2 and Y1 to Y2, is there some way to query for all entities from X1 to X2 sorted by their Y values and then easily grab the relevant ones between

Testing for inequality in T-SQL

感情迁移 提交于 2019-11-27 04:35:02
I've just come across this in a WHERE clause: AND NOT (t.id = @id) How does this compare with: AND t.id != @id Or with: AND t.id <> @id I'd always write the latter myself, but clearly someone else thinks differently. Is one going to perform any better than the other? I know that using <> or != is going to bust any hopes for using an index that I might have had, but surely the first approach above will suffer the same problem? SQLMenace These 3 will get the same exact execution plan declare @id varchar(40) select @id = '172-32-1176' select * from authors where au_id <> @id select * from authors

Comparing IEEE floats and doubles for equality

主宰稳场 提交于 2019-11-27 04:17:41
What is the best method for comparing IEEE floats and doubles for equality? I have heard of several methods, but I wanted to see what the community thought. The best approach I think is to compare ULPs . bool is_nan(float f) { return (*reinterpret_cast<unsigned __int32*>(&f) & 0x7f800000) == 0x7f800000 && (*reinterpret_cast<unsigned __int32*>(&f) & 0x007fffff) != 0; } bool is_finite(float f) { return (*reinterpret_cast<unsigned __int32*>(&f) & 0x7f800000) != 0x7f800000; } // if this symbol is defined, NaNs are never equal to anything (as is normal in IEEE floating point) // if this symbol is

Using the correct, or preferable, not equal operator in MySQL

百般思念 提交于 2019-11-27 03:02:23
问题 Which of the two (semantically equivalent) ways is preferable to test for inequality? 'foo' != 'bar' (exclamation mark and equals sign) 'foo' <> 'bar' (less than and greater than chevron symbols together) The MySQL documentation clearly indicates that there is no difference between them and yet some people seem to be attached to only doing it one way or the other. Maybe this is just another pointless vi vs. emacs debate but when other people are reading your code (and therefore your queries),

how to effectively run two inequality filters on queries in app engine

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-11-26 16:12:24
问题 I'm aware that app engine has the restriction of "Inequality Filters Are Allowed On One Property Only" as described here: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/queriesandindexes.html#Introducing_Indexes However is there some way to essentially run two filters, or is this simply not possible? For instance, if I had an entity kind that simply had an X and Y coordinate, and I wanted all entities that are within a certain range of X1 to X2 and Y1 to Y2, is there some way to query

Testing for inequality in T-SQL

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-11-26 11:16:05
问题 I\'ve just come across this in a WHERE clause: AND NOT (t.id = @id) How does this compare with: AND t.id != @id Or with: AND t.id <> @id I\'d always write the latter myself, but clearly someone else thinks differently. Is one going to perform any better than the other? I know that using <> or != is going to bust any hopes for using an index that I might have had, but surely the first approach above will suffer the same problem? 回答1: These 3 will get the same exact execution plan declare @id

Comparing IEEE floats and doubles for equality

偶尔善良 提交于 2019-11-26 11:07:43
问题 What is the best method for comparing IEEE floats and doubles for equality? I have heard of several methods, but I wanted to see what the community thought. 回答1: The best approach I think is to compare ULPs. bool is_nan(float f) { return (*reinterpret_cast<unsigned __int32*>(&f) & 0x7f800000) == 0x7f800000 && (*reinterpret_cast<unsigned __int32*>(&f) & 0x007fffff) != 0; } bool is_finite(float f) { return (*reinterpret_cast<unsigned __int32*>(&f) & 0x7f800000) != 0x7f800000; } // if this