icu

I am trying to cross compile the icu library for the iPhone. I downloaded a configure script wrapper from http://sites.google.com/site/michaelsafyan/coding/articles/iphone When I execute it, I get the following error message: checking wchar.h usability... no checking wchar.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: wchar.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: wchar.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: wchar.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: wchar.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: wchar.h: proceeding with the

I'm having a problem identical to this one , but the solution provided there isn't working for me. I downloaded the Symfony 2.4.1 Standard Vendors with Vendors package from the Symfony Downloads Page . After extracting the files and downloading composer.phar, I run php composer.phar install and get this error: Loading composer repositories with package information Installing dependencies (including require-dev) from lock file Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages. Problem 1 - symfony/icu v1.2.0 requires lib-icu >=4.4 -> the requested linked library icu has

this code works for english, spanish and german ordninal numbers, but with russian or italian ordninal numbers it doesn't work. 'ru-RU' , 'it-IT' also don't work I get for example in russian for 2 -> два (this is the cardinal number) , but I want the ordinal number and this would be here 2 -> второй. I get for example in italian for 2 -> due (this is the cardinal number) , but I want the ordinal number and this would be here 2 -> secondo. Update: I found a solution with works in french, spain, german and some other languages: maskuline ordinal numbers: %spellout-ordinal-maskuline feminine

My application requires custom time and date setting capabilities. I checked both ICU and boost::date_time libraries. Both appears to meet my requirements from a completeness point of view. I would like to know if there is any preference between the two and on what basis? which one will score on performance? Without more information about your specific use case and environment, there's no way to give a definitive answer as to whether either library out-performs the other. As Xeo suggested, profiling is the best way to address performance concerns. If your use case includes "general" date/time

I want to transliterate Hindi text into English in following way Hindi - " आपका स्वागत है " to English - " aapka swagat hain " I don't want to use Google's Translate API or any other translate API. If I use them it will end up giving me the translated version of my hindi text which is " Welcome ". Is there any Transliterate library which I can use in my Android code? I've heard of ICU but no luck in finding the procedure to use it in my code. One potential way to solve the problem is to break it into two solvable ones and marry the two. There are Hindi readers which can read Hindi devanagari