history

How to retrieve the history of a file?

假如想象 提交于 2019-11-30 10:59:47
I got another libgit2 issue and will be very grateful for your help. I'm trying to retrieve file history, i.e. list of commits where this file was changed. And it seems to be quite unconventional... As far as I can see, there are no function for that. The only approach I can come up with is to use revision walking API to iterate through revisions, check the tree object attached to commit and search for given file there, if found, add commit to my list, otherwise proceed to next commit. But it looks none-optimal for me... May be is there any other approach, for example, look directly into .git

How to concatenate two git histories?

时间秒杀一切 提交于 2019-11-30 10:25:07
问题 I have two git repositories that are tangentially related. Namely, content of one was a predecessor of the other. I would like to somehow prepend the full history of depository A to the depository B, so that tip of A would be a parent of the very first changeset of repository B? Histories in both are pretty linear. Is this possible? 回答1: You could try using the graft file ( .git/info/grafts ) where you could overwrite the parenthood of a commit (like the first of projectB having for parent

Why is FILE all-caps as in FILE*? [closed]

痞子三分冷 提交于 2019-11-30 08:55:53
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 8 years ago . This just seems odd to me, most other things are lower case. Is there some historical reason? 回答1: It's a macro. Macros have

Why does C's “fopen” take a “const char *” as its second argument?

醉酒当歌 提交于 2019-11-30 08:35:18
It has always struck me as strange that the C function "fopen" takes a "const char *" as the second argument. I would think it would be easier to both read your code and implement the library's code if there were bit masks defined in stdio.h, like "IO_READ" and such, so you could do things like: FILE* myFile = fopen("file.txt", IO_READ | IO_WRITE); Is there a programmatic reason for the way it actually is, or is it just historic? (i.e. "That's just the way it is.") One word : legacy. Unfortunately we have to live with it. Just speculation : Maybe at the time a "const char *" seemed more

Why Python language does not have a writeln() method?

不想你离开。 提交于 2019-11-30 08:22:41
If we need to write a new line to a file we have to code: file_output.write('Fooo line \n') Are there any reasons why Python does not have a writeln() method? It was omitted to provide a symmetric interface of the file methods and because a writeln() would make no sense: read() matches write() : they both operate on raw data readlines() matches writelines() : they both operate on lines including their EOLs readline() is rarely used; an iterator does the same job (except for the optional size param) A writeline() (or writeln() ) would be essentially the same as write() , since it wouldn't add

The unmentioned parts of COBOL's history [closed]

别来无恙 提交于 2019-11-30 08:21:59
问题 Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post. Closed 5 years ago . I'm very curious about old programming languages, especially COBOL, and as Wikipedia couldn't really tell me much about this topic, I decided to ask it here: Was COBOL the first programming language really being used in financial, stock and banking systems? Where exactly was COBOL

Why does/did C allow implicit function and typeless variable declarations?

泄露秘密 提交于 2019-11-30 07:25:29
问题 Why is it sensible for a language to allow implicit declarations of functions and typeless variables? I get that C is old, but allowing to omit declarations and default to int() (or int in case of variables) doesn't seem so sane to me, even back then. So, why was it originally introduced? Was it ever really useful? Is it actually (still) used? Note: I realise that modern compilers give you warnings (depending on which flags you pass them), and you can suppress this feature. That's not the

Use a persistent notification to allow the user to return to running Android app

南笙酒味 提交于 2019-11-30 07:12:05
I am developing an app with numerous Activities. I would like to create a persistent notification that (more or less) says, "AppName - Return to AppName" that will be present whenever my background services are running. Creating and disposing of the notification was no problem. Now, the user could be on any of several screens/Activities, leave the application, then want to re-enter the app via the notification. The problem is , the notification must have an intent, which launches a predetermined Activity . I want the notification to re-enter the app in whatever Activity is at the top of the

Why are regular expressions called “regular” expressions?

强颜欢笑 提交于 2019-11-30 05:37:44
Why are regular expressions called regular expressions? They are based on regular languages . Why are they called "regular expressions?" Regular expressions trace back to the work of an American mathematician by the name of Stephen Kleene (one of the most influential figures in the development of theoretical computer science) who developed regular expressions as a notation for describing what he called "the algebra of regular sets." His work eventually found its way into some early efforts with computational search algorithms, and from there to some of the earliest text-manipulation tools on

Why the \\G in SELECT * FROM table_name\\G?

痴心易碎 提交于 2019-11-30 04:41:39
Terminating a MySQL query with \G instead of ; will cause MySQL to return the result set in vertical format, which is sometimes easier to read if the number of returned columns is large. Example: mysql> SELECT * FROM help_keyword LIMIT 3\G *************************** 1. row *************************** help_keyword_id: 0 name: JOIN *************************** 2. row *************************** help_keyword_id: 1 name: REPEAT *************************** 3. row *************************** help_keyword_id: 2 name: SERIALIZABLE 3 rows in set (0.00 sec) My question asked out of pure curiosity: Is