handle

I'm trying to extract the URL from the address bar of IE. (IE 8 on Windows 7) using the following C# code. static string GetUrlFromIE() { IntPtr windowHandle = APIFuncs.getForegroundWindow(); IntPtr childHandle; String strUrlToReturn = ""; //try to get a handle to IE's toolbar container childHandle = APIFuncs.FindWindowEx(windowHandle, IntPtr.Zero, "WorkerW", IntPtr.Zero); if (childHandle != IntPtr.Zero) { //get a handle to address bar childHandle = APIFuncs.FindWindowEx(childHandle, IntPtr.Zero, "ReBarWindow32", IntPtr.Zero); if (childHandle != IntPtr.Zero) { childHandle = APIFuncs

We have a .NET console app that has many foreground threads. If we kill the process using Task Manager or issuing killjob, kill from the command line in windows, is there a way by which we can gracefully shut down the application (adding manged code within the .net console app), something like having a function being called say TodoBeforeShutdown() that disposes objects, closes any open connections, etc. P.S. - I read the other threads and they all suggested different ways to kill the process, rather than my specific question, what is the best way we can handle a terminate process, within the

I'm currently creating a silent print module. The current control I'm using is, it's making sure that the control handle is already created ( IsHandleCreated ). I did everything to cheat this with no luck at all. Do you have ideas in mind on how can I create a handle for the control without displaying any in the screen? denisenkom Try to overload CreateParams property getter. In it clear the WS_VISIBLE flag. You have to access the Handle property (put the result in a dummy variable or something). Look in Reflector; it forces handle creation. I had the same problem with some other controls and

Im trying to map the file to the memory and use MapViewOfFile(), but it failes with error code 6. I tried just about anything, I also read about big files being the problem, but the problem happens also with a 1kb file. my code: HANDLE hFile = CreateFile(pFile, GENERIC_READ, 0, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL); e = GetLastError(); printf("CreateFile Errorcode %d\n", GetLastError()); if (hFile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) { printf("Error: could not create handle to file"); printf("CreateFileMapping error code: %d", e) return 1; } printf("successfully created a Handle to try.txt");

I have a function to optimize, say Function, in Matlab. This function depends on variables (say x) over which I want to optimize and one parameter (say, Q) which does not need to be optimized.Hence, the function Function(x,Q). In other words, I have an array of values for Q and want to find optimal x values for each Q. However, I cannot find a way how to pass those Q values when using function handle @Function in optimization function. So, my question is how to pass those Q values when using function handle in optimization functions, for example fmincon(@Function,x0,A,b)? Try using anonymous

During the lifetime of a .NET process, does the handle of a System.Windows.Forms.Form , lets say the main form used in Application.Run(form) actually change it's value, i.e. if using the value of the handle in a different process, e.g. IntPtr handle = User32.FindWindow(null, "Name") , is there a case where that handle might be invalidated by the .NET runtime? EDIT I need to know the handles because I want to use SendMessage and WM_COPYDATA and the like for IPC. A window handle is guaranteed to be valid and not get reused for as long as the window lives. It's index like in nature, valid

can someone tell me how i can capture a running process in c# using the process class if i already know the handle? Id rather not have not have to enumerate the getrunning processes method either. pInvoke is ok if possible. In plain C#, it looks like you have to loop through them all: // IntPtr myHandle = ... Process myProcess = Process.GetProcesses().Single( p => p.Id != 0 && p.Handle == myHandle); The above example intentionally fails if the handle isn't found. Otherwise, you could of course use SingleOrDefault . Apparently, it doesn't like you requesting the handle of process ID 0 , hence