git-stash

Is it possible to preview stash contents in git?

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-11-27 09:57:50
I often put work away for later, then other stuff comes along, and a few weeks later, I want to inspect the stash, and find out what changes it would make if I applied it to working tree in its current state. I know I can do a git diff on the stash, but this shows me all the differences between the working tree and the stash, whereas I'm just interested to know what the stash apply is going to change. How can I do this? Jlew git stash show will show you the files that changed in your most recent stash. You can add the -p option to show the diff. git stash show -p If the stash you are

git stash -> merge stashed change with current changes

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-11-27 09:27:50
问题 I made some changes to my branch and realized I forgot I had stashed some other necessary changes to said branch. What I want is a way to merge my stashed changes with the current changes. Is there a way to do this? Its more for convenience, I eventually gave up and committed first my current changes, then my stashed changes, but I would have preferred to get them in with one fell swoop. 回答1: I just discovered that if your uncommitted changes are added to the index (i.e. "staged", using git

Can I fetch a stash from a remote repo into a local branch?

时光怂恿深爱的人放手 提交于 2019-11-27 09:02:59
A colleague has a stash in their repository which I can access (via the filesystem), and I'd like to pull that stash into a branch in my repository. % git ls-remote ~alice/work/repo/ stash 3ccc82fb1ee0e7bde1250c7926d333ce21c109c0 refs/stash But when I try to fetch that, git tells me "unable to find 3cc82..." % git fetch ~alice/work/repo stash:new_branch remote: Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) error: unable to find 3ccc82fb1ee0e7bde1250c7926d333ce21c109c0 fatal: object 3ccc82fb1ee0e7bde1250c7926d333ce21c109c0 not found Is there a way I can fetch the remote stash? sehe Update : A direct

How to resolve git stash conflict without commit?

左心房为你撑大大i 提交于 2019-11-27 08:55:06
问题 As asked in this question, I also want to know how to resolve a conflicting git stash pop without adding all modifications to a commit (just like "git stash pop" without a conflict does). My current approach is very uncool because I do it this way: git stash pop -> CONFLICT git stash drop [resolve conflict] [add conflict files] git reset HEAD <all files that are in commit-mode> [Update] A way to reproduce it: mkdir foo; cd foo; git init echo "1" > one echo "2" > two git add -A; git commit -m

What are those 'WIP' and 'index' commits that appear after stashing?

扶醉桌前 提交于 2019-11-27 06:40:59
问题 When I run git lg on my local development branch, the latest commit is shown as below: * 7d21213 - (1 hours ago) update business rules - developer1 (HEAD, origin/develop, origin/HEAD, develop) However, if I stash local changes by running git stash and then run git lg , I get the following: * at12334 - (13 seconds ago) WIP on develop: 7d21213 update business rules - developer1 (refs/stash) |\ | * ef9a11b - (14 seconds ago) index on develop: 7d21213 update business rules - developer1 |/ *

How to recover stashed uncommitted changes

て烟熏妆下的殇ゞ 提交于 2019-11-27 05:43:17
I had some uncommitted changes in my development branch and I stashed them using git stash , but there were some changes which were very important among those stashed ones. Is there any way to get back those changes? Also, I have made some changes on top of the stashed code files since. Is there any chance I can retrieve the stashed changes to a new branch if possible? torek The easy answer to the easy question is git stash apply Just check out the branch you want your changes on, and then git stash apply . Then use git diff to see the result. After you're all done with your changes—the apply

Git diff against a stash

Deadly 提交于 2019-11-27 05:43:11
How can I see the changes un-stashing will make to the current working tree? I would like to know what changes will be made before applying them! Amber See the most recent stash: git stash show -p See an arbitrary stash: git stash show -p stash@{1} From the git stash manpages: By default, the command shows the diffstat, but it will accept any format known to git diff (e.g., git stash show -p stash@{1} to view the second most recent stash in patch form). czerasz To see the most recent stash: git stash show -p To see an arbitrary stash: git stash show -p stash@{1} Also, I use git diff to compare

How would I extract a single file (or changes to a file) from a git stash?

走远了吗. 提交于 2019-11-27 05:43:10
I'd like to know if it is possible to extract a single file or diff of a file from a git stash without popping the stash changeset off. Might anyone be able to provide some suggestions/ideas about this? In git stash manpage you can read that (in "Discussion" section, just after "Options" description): A stash is represented as a commit whose tree records the state of the working directory, and its first parent is the commit at HEAD when the stash was created. So you can treat stash (e.g. stash@{0} is first / topmost stash) as a merge commit, and use: $ git diff stash@{0}^1 stash@{0} --

See what's in a stash without applying it [duplicate]

孤街浪徒 提交于 2019-11-27 05:42:58
Possible Duplicate: Is it possible to preview stash contents in git? I see here you can apply/unapply a stash and even create a new branch off of a stash. Is it possible to simply see what is inside the stash without actually applying it? simont From the man git-stash page: The modifications stashed away by this command can be listed with git stash list, inspected with git stash show show [<stash>] Show the changes recorded in the stash as a diff between the stashed state and its original parent. When no <stash> is given, shows the latest one. By default, the command shows the diffstat, but it

How to name and retrieve a stash by name in git?

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-27 05:42:54
I was always under the impression that you could give a stash a name by doing git stash save stashname , which you could later on apply by doing git stash apply stashname . But it seems that in this case all that happens is that stashname will be used as the stash description. Is there no way to actually name a stash? If not, what would you recommend to achieve equivalent functionality? Essentially I have a small stash which I would periodically like to apply, but don't want to always have to hunt in git stash list what its actual stash number is. Sri Murthy Upadhyayula This is how you do it: