git-checkout

File Level Tracking In Git (Files from multiple branches in same directory)

情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2019-12-07 10:43:40
问题 Is there any script that lets one remember branch/commit seperatly for files in some directory so that one can simultaneously work on file1 on branch1 and file2 on branch2 in the same directory and have them commit appropriately. If not I'll implement it myself. My plan is to have hidden checkout directories for various branches/repos and populating the apparent checkout with links to these files so that commits simply committed their respective hidden branches but advice would be appreciated

Including submodules in git checkout to GIT_WORK_TREE in hook

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-07 05:09:37
问题 Is it possible to include submodules when using the following code in a post-update hook? GIT_WORK_TREE=/path/to/directory git checkout -f What other options would I have to distribute code, including submodules from a post-update hook? Thanks. 回答1: The question "Using git submodule update --init on a post hook" mentions the error message you could see if using this in your post-update hook: GIT_WORK_TREE=/path/to/directory git submodule update --init That would give a: remote: You need to

Git command to checkout latest commit from develop branch

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-12-06 15:35:38
Using groovy syntax in Jenkins pipeline, below is the syntax used for check out: git branch: branchName, credentialsId: credential, url: "${gitLabServer}/${projectName}/${repo}.git" Where credential is jenkins credential( 111111-222222-33333-44444 ) shown below: jenkins does the following under the hood, for groovy syntax(above): Cloning the remote Git repository Cloning repository ssh://git@10.xx.xx.xx:2222/abc/def.git > git init /app/jenkins/workspace/../def # timeout=10 Fetching upstream changes from ssh://git@10.xx.xx.xx:2222/abc/def.git > git --version # timeout=10 using GIT_SSH to set

Why do I have a detached HEAD after checking out the most recent commit?

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-12-06 14:54:53
Recently, while working in a git repository, I wanted to view the code at an old commit ( 68cce45 ), so I did git checkout 68cce45 After viewing the changes, I wanted to return to the current version of the repository and keep working. Since 2bcfd11 was the most recent commit, I did git checkout 2bcfd11 I then made some changes and did git add * and then git status which gave me the warning: HEAD detached at 2bcfd11 . I'm confused. I can understand why I would be in a "detached HEAD state" if the last commit I checked-out was several versions ago. But since the last commit I checked-out was

Move uncommitted changes from current branch to another branch that conflicts with those changes

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-12-06 06:06:15
Suppose I am on branch master and I start making some changes. I make the changes to a file which is already opened in Emacs (so under the hood, as checkouts happen, Emacs is unaware unless I revert-buffer constantly). The file did exist in branch other_branch which was intended to be merged into master later on. But the file did not exist in master until I accidentally saved it from Emacs. The changes are uncommitted, but I realize that I shouldn't have been making the changes on master and had intended to checkout a different branch before starting on the changes. I don't want to lose the

Can't discard changes in git

夙愿已清 提交于 2019-12-06 02:29:02
A week or two ago I took some files that I had been archiving with a simple find |sed|tar|xz|gpg bash script, unpacked them all, and put their contents in a git repo, commited, put the next archives content in the repo, committed (rinse and repeat) in order to have a nicer system. All files were edited with on one of my two computers, both using Arch Linux, in either TeXstudio or Vim. I tried to checkout an old version, but its flipping out---it won't let me due to changed that are outstanding. I tried everything I knew how, and then went on Google to find out things I didn't know. There are a

Git: Best way to add only some parts of a file from another branch?

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-12-06 00:13:31
问题 Let's say you have a branch master and another branch production , both containing a version of the file prog.py , as well as many other files. Imagine that you modify many files in the production branch, including prog.py . Now, what is the best way of having only some changes made on prog.py in the production branch be applied to its version in the master branch? I started moving to the master branch and importing the file from the production branch: git checkout master git checkout

File Level Tracking In Git (Files from multiple branches in same directory)

巧了我就是萌 提交于 2019-12-05 15:13:51
Is there any script that lets one remember branch/commit seperatly for files in some directory so that one can simultaneously work on file1 on branch1 and file2 on branch2 in the same directory and have them commit appropriately. If not I'll implement it myself. My plan is to have hidden checkout directories for various branches/repos and populating the apparent checkout with links to these files so that commits simply committed their respective hidden branches but advice would be appreciated. Thus one could do something like mgit checkout branch1 filename/filegroup mgit add filename

Git checkout to external work tree and remove deleted files

a 夏天 提交于 2019-12-05 15:02:13
We want to use Git to deploy code on our webserver. Therefore, we have a initialized a bare repository on our production server. Whenever we release a new version, we perform a git checkout into the DocumentRoot of the website: git --work-tree=/path/to/webroot/ checkout -f master In the subdirectories of webroot , there are several files which are not tracked by Git (Cache files, user-uploaded files etc.). These must of course not be deleted by Git when performing the checkout (and this part works fine so far). However, Git also does not delete files which were previously tracked, but have

Why is the git command to switch branches named “git checkout”?

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2019-12-05 10:27:53
问题 Why is the git command to switch branches named git checkout ? Does it really make sense ? I would name it git switch instead. Besides, git checkout has other meanings: e.g. reverting a file (like svn revert ) 回答1: I see that most other answers are explaining what git checkout does and why "checkout" might be a reasonable way to describe that. However, while I love git dearly, this does touch on two serious points of frustration that arise when I'm trying to help people to understand the