functional-programming

An ArrowCircuit instance for stream processors which could block

半世苍凉 提交于 2021-01-21 07:30:30
问题 The Control.Arrow.Operations.ArrowCircuit class is for: An arrow type that can be used to interpret synchronous circuits. I want to know what synchronous means here. I looked it up on Wikipedia, where they are speaking of digital electronics. My electronics is quite rusty, so here is the question: what is wrong (if anything is) with such an instance for the so-called asynchronous stream processors: data StreamProcessor a b = Get (a -> StreamProcessor a b) | Put b (StreamProcessor a b) | Halt

How to replicate map, filter and reduce behaviors in C++ using STL?

拟墨画扇 提交于 2021-01-20 14:47:09
问题 I suppose we can use std::transform to replicate the map behavior in C++ like this : std::vector<int> in = { 1 , 2 , 3 ,4 }; std::vector<int> out(in.size()); std::transform(in.being() , in.end() , out.begin() , [](const int & val) { return val+1; }); I guess a better way would be to use the back inserter.' std::vector<int> out2; std::transform(in.begin() , in.end() , std::back_inserter(out2) , [](const int & val){ return val + 1; }); // out will be { 2 , 3 ,4 ,5 } Am I right ? How do I do the

What is the advantage of IntStream over usual Stream?

最后都变了- 提交于 2021-01-19 06:39:07
问题 How is IntStream , DoubleStream , or LongStream better than regular stream in Java 8? Do these threads have high performance or maybe usability? 回答1: Stream<Integer> etc. have to work with boxed values ( Integer instead of primitive int ) which takes significantly more memory and usually a lot of boxing/unboxing operations (depending on your code). Why only Int/Double/Long ? Just because they were expected to be used most often. Same applies to OptionalInt and friends and all the functional

What is the advantage of IntStream over usual Stream?

让人想犯罪 __ 提交于 2021-01-19 06:39:00
问题 How is IntStream , DoubleStream , or LongStream better than regular stream in Java 8? Do these threads have high performance or maybe usability? 回答1: Stream<Integer> etc. have to work with boxed values ( Integer instead of primitive int ) which takes significantly more memory and usually a lot of boxing/unboxing operations (depending on your code). Why only Int/Double/Long ? Just because they were expected to be used most often. Same applies to OptionalInt and friends and all the functional

Writing a clean/cleaner solution to “Valid Anagram” in Elixir

半腔热情 提交于 2021-01-07 06:36:38
问题 Trying to level up my Elixir understanding by doing algo/leetCode style problems using Elixir. As I'm a relatively new programmer (around a year in) and was trained on traditionally OOP languages like Ruby and JS, it's still somewhat hard for me to wrap my head around doing algo questions in a functional paradigm, though I felt I understood the Udemy course I took on Elixir/Phoenix. I wrote a solution to the LeetCode "valid anagram" problem using Elixir and Repl and wanted to see if people

Writing a clean/cleaner solution to “Valid Anagram” in Elixir

眉间皱痕 提交于 2021-01-07 06:35:31
问题 Trying to level up my Elixir understanding by doing algo/leetCode style problems using Elixir. As I'm a relatively new programmer (around a year in) and was trained on traditionally OOP languages like Ruby and JS, it's still somewhat hard for me to wrap my head around doing algo questions in a functional paradigm, though I felt I understood the Udemy course I took on Elixir/Phoenix. I wrote a solution to the LeetCode "valid anagram" problem using Elixir and Repl and wanted to see if people

Writing a clean/cleaner solution to “Valid Anagram” in Elixir

寵の児 提交于 2021-01-07 06:33:56
问题 Trying to level up my Elixir understanding by doing algo/leetCode style problems using Elixir. As I'm a relatively new programmer (around a year in) and was trained on traditionally OOP languages like Ruby and JS, it's still somewhat hard for me to wrap my head around doing algo questions in a functional paradigm, though I felt I understood the Udemy course I took on Elixir/Phoenix. I wrote a solution to the LeetCode "valid anagram" problem using Elixir and Repl and wanted to see if people

Swap two array elements in a functional way

自古美人都是妖i 提交于 2020-12-31 04:51:57
问题 I'm trying to swap 2 elements within an array in a functional way in javascript (es6) let arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6] let result = swap(arr, 1, 2) // input: array, first element, second element // result=[1,3,2,4,5,6] The only way I could think about is: const swap = (arr, a, b) => arr.map( (curr,i) => i === a ? arr[b] : curr ) .map( (curr,i) => i === b ? arr[a] : curr ) But this code runs twice over the array, and not readable at all. Any suggestions for a nice clean functional code? Thanks. 回答1:

Swap two array elements in a functional way

扶醉桌前 提交于 2020-12-31 04:51:53
问题 I'm trying to swap 2 elements within an array in a functional way in javascript (es6) let arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6] let result = swap(arr, 1, 2) // input: array, first element, second element // result=[1,3,2,4,5,6] The only way I could think about is: const swap = (arr, a, b) => arr.map( (curr,i) => i === a ? arr[b] : curr ) .map( (curr,i) => i === b ? arr[a] : curr ) But this code runs twice over the array, and not readable at all. Any suggestions for a nice clean functional code? Thanks. 回答1:

Swap two array elements in a functional way

梦想的初衷 提交于 2020-12-31 04:49:49
问题 I'm trying to swap 2 elements within an array in a functional way in javascript (es6) let arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6] let result = swap(arr, 1, 2) // input: array, first element, second element // result=[1,3,2,4,5,6] The only way I could think about is: const swap = (arr, a, b) => arr.map( (curr,i) => i === a ? arr[b] : curr ) .map( (curr,i) => i === b ? arr[a] : curr ) But this code runs twice over the array, and not readable at all. Any suggestions for a nice clean functional code? Thanks. 回答1: