exit

exit()与_exit()的区别

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-11-26 20:30:53
从图中可以看出,_exit 函数的作用是:直接使进程停止运行,清除其使用的内存空间,并清除其在内核的各种数据结构;exit 函数则在这些基础上做了一些小动作,在执行退出之前还加了若干道工序。exit() 函数与 _exit() 函数的最大区别在于exit()函数在调用exit 系统调用前要检查文件的打开情况,把文件缓冲区中的内容写回文件。也就是图中的“清理I/O缓冲”。 所需头文件: exit: #include<stdlib.h> _exit: #include<unistd.h> 函数原型:exit: void exit(int status) _exit: void _exit(int status) 函数传入值:status 是一个整型的参数,可以利用这个参数传递进程结束时的状态。一般来说,0表示正常结束;其他的数值表示出现了错误,进程非正常结束。在实际编程时,父进程可以利用wait 系统调用接收子进程的返回值,从而针对不同的情况进行不同的处理。 exit()与_exit() 实例分析 printf(const char *fmt,...)函数使用的是缓冲I/O方式,该函数在遇到 "\n" 换行符时自动从缓冲区中将记录读出。 <代码示例> #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<sys/types.h> #include

转:exit()与_exit()的区别

回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2019-11-26 20:30:01
版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,未经博主允许不得转载。 从图中可以看出,_exit 函数的作用是:直接使进程停止运行,清除其使用的内存空间,并清除其在内核的各种数据结构;exit 函数则在这些基础上做了一些小动作,在执行退出之前还加了若干道工序。exit() 函数与 _exit() 函数的最大区别在于exit()函数在调用exit 系统调用前要检查文件的打开情况,把文件缓冲区中的内容写回文件。也就是图中的“清理I/O缓冲”。 所需头文件: exit: #include<stdlib.h> _exit: #include<unistd.h> 函数原型:exit: void exit(int status) _exit: void _exit(int status) 函数传入值:status 是一个整型的参数,可以利用这个参数传递进程结束时的状态。一般来说,0表示正常结束;其他的数值表示出现了错误,进程非正常结束。在实际编程时,父进程可以利用wait 系统调用接收子进程的返回值,从而针对不同的情况进行不同的处理。 exit()与_exit() 实例分析 printf(const char *fmt,...)函数使用的是缓冲I/O方式,该函数在遇到 "\n" 换行符时自动从缓冲区中将记录读出。 <代码示例> #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h>

Graceful shutdown of a node.JS HTTP server

岁酱吖の 提交于 2019-11-26 19:43:39
问题 Here is a simple webserver I am working on var server = require("http").createServer(function(req,resp) { resp.writeHead(200,{"Content-Type":"text/plain"}) resp.write("hi") resp.end() server.close() }) server.listen(80, 'localhost') // The shortest webserver you ever did see! Thanks to Node.JS :) Works great except for keep-alive. When the first request comes in, server.close gets called. But the process does not end. Actually the TCP connection is still open which allows another request to

android pressing back button should exit the app

怎甘沉沦 提交于 2019-11-26 19:42:37
When a user presses the back button on an intent, the application should quit. How can I ensure the application quits when the back button is pressed? Immediately after you start a new activity, using startActivity , make sure you call finish() so that the current activity is not stacked behind the new one. EDIT With regards to your comment: What you're suggesting is not particularly how the android app flow usually works, and how the users expect it to work. What you can do if you really want to, is to make sure that every startActivity leading up to that activity, is a startActivityForResult

WPF Command Line

萝らか妹 提交于 2019-11-26 19:39:36
I am trying to create a WPF application that takes command line arguments. If no arguments are given, the main window should pop up. In cases of some specific command line arguments, code should be run with no GUI and exit when finished. Any suggestions on how this should properly be done would be appreciated. First, find this attribute at the top of your App.xaml file and remove it: StartupUri="Window1.xaml" That means that the application won't automatically instantiate your main window and show it. Next, override the OnStartup method in your App class to perform the logic: protected

Checking Bash exit status of several commands efficiently

Deadly 提交于 2019-11-26 19:16:55
Is there something similar to pipefail for multiple commands, like a 'try' statement but within bash. I would like to do something like this: echo "trying stuff" try { command1 command2 command3 } And at any point, if any command fails, drop out and echo out the error of that command. I don't want to have to do something like: command1 if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "command1 borked it" fi command2 if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "command2 borked it" fi And so on... or anything like: pipefail -o command1 "arg1" "arg2" | command2 "arg1" "arg2" | command3 Because the arguments of each command I believe

In a Bash script, how can I exit the entire script if a certain condition occurs?

假如想象 提交于 2019-11-26 18:42:13
问题 I'm writing a script in Bash to test some code. However, it seems silly to run the tests if compiling the code fails in the first place, in which case I'll just abort the tests. Is there a way I can do this without wrapping the entire script inside of a while loop and using breaks? Something like a dun dun dun goto? 回答1: Try this statement: exit 1 Replace 1 with appropriate error codes. See also Exit Codes With Special Meanings. 回答2: Use set -e #!/bin/bash set -e /bin/command-that-fails /bin

How do I guarantee fast shutdown of my win32 app?

允我心安 提交于 2019-11-26 18:29:06
问题 I've got a C++ Win32 application that has a number of threads that might be busy doing IO (HTTP calls, etc) when the user wants to shutdown the application. Currently, I play nicely and wait for all the threads to end before returning from main . Sometimes, this takes longer than I would like and indeed, it seems kind of pointless to make the user wait when I could just exit. However, if I just go ahead and return from main , I'm likely to get crashes as destructors start getting called while

How do I make a C++ console program exit?

谁说胖子不能爱 提交于 2019-11-26 18:27:33
问题 Is there a line of code that will terminate the program? Something like python's sys.exit() ? 回答1: #include <cstdlib> ... exit( exit_code ); 回答2: While you can call exit() (and may need to do so if your application encounters some fatal error), the cleanest way to exit a program is to return from main() : int main() { // do whatever your program does } // function returns and exits program When you call exit() , objects with automatic storage duration (local variables) are not destroyed

How to exit from Python without traceback?

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-11-26 18:06:57
I would like to know how to I exit from Python without having an traceback dump on the output. I still want want to be able to return an error code but I do not want to display the traceback log. I want to be able to exit using exit(number) without trace but in case of an Exception (not an exit) I want the trace. jkp You are presumably encountering an exception and the program is exiting because of this (with a traceback). The first thing to do therefore is to catch that exception, before exiting cleanly (maybe with a message, example given). Try something like this in your main routine: