esb

My current situation: I currently have a Mule ESB application with three flows which process messages originating from two different sources, these three flows are tied together using a VM queue. Flow #1: Inbound (Endpoint #1) -> (Perform message processing and transformations) -> Outbound (Endpoint #3) Flow #2: Inbound (Endpoint #2) -> (Perform message processing and transformations) -> Outbound (Endpoint #3) Flow #3 Inbound (Endpoint #3) -> (Perform message processing and transformations, do stuff) -> Outbound Problem/ Issue: Now what I want to do is introduce a fourth flow, Flow #4, that

To cut a long story short, I am working on a project where we are rewriting a large web application for all the usual reasons. The main aim of the rewrite is to separate this large single application running on single server into many smaller decoupled applications, which can be run on many servers. Ok here's what I would like: I would like HTTP to be the main transport mechanism. When one application for example the CMS has been updated it will contact the broker via http and say "I've changed" , then the broker will send back a 200 OK to say "thanks I got the message" . The broker will then

由于Mule ESB提供的容器自身限制，使它不容易集成第三方库。为了解决这个问题，Mule提供了ESB项目与Spring框架的集成。但是这个集成在转换为Tomcat项目时会遇到一些问题，下面我会一一加以叙述。 ESB项目与spring的集成参考了Mule ESB的Spring集成文档，地址为 https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-user-guide/v/3.8/using-spring-beans-as-flow-components 在前面的例子中请求的json报文是固定的，例如{"name":"张三","id":"197"}，这样仅能处理单个用户，当我们想处理多个用户，每个用户有多个属性信息时就不是很方便。我们想仅仅提供一批需要处理的用户Id的json报文，例如 { "students": [ [ { "id":"197" }, { "id":"198" }, { "id":"199" } ] ] } ESB项目解析这样的json报文，根据id从数据库里读取这些学生的详细信息，再通过Data Weaver的转换为xml报文，输出以下的xml响应报文： <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <Students> <Student> <name>张三</name> <id>197</id> <class>1年1班

I am looking into architectural patterns, Enterprise Services Bus (ESB) precisely. Upon reading this article Enterprise Integration , and with little to no experience I am wondering if BizTalk has is a ESB or is it just a EAI (Hub/Spokes or Bus)? I found this NServiceBus and Biztalk , describing BizTalk as a central message broker. Taking other ESB frameworks into account (NServiceBus and Rhino Service Bus). These frameworks have no central point to process messages. Is Biztalk a EAI rather than an ESB? Many thanks BizTalk is punted by Microsoft as having ESB capabilities - see the BTS ESB

I am confused in these web service terminologies SOA, ESB. Anybody please explain. SOA is an architectural approach where you expose and encapsulate 'services' in a coarse-grained manner. It does not prescribe any technical mechanism or implementation. SOA is more related to boundary / integration interaction between systems. So if system A exposes services using a SOA I can interact with those services from system B. An ESB on the other hand is a technical implementation that aids in delivering a SOA. SOA is service oriented architecture . In SOA services are decoupled and can interact with

#0 系列目录# 聊聊服务架构 深入浅出SOA思想 微服务、SOA 和 API对比与分析 #1 SOA是什么# SOA的全称是Service-Oriented Architecture，面向服务架构。 是一种架构，不是一种具体的开发技术 。 SOA的出现，预示着一个 以服务为导向 的新IT（Information Technology）时代的到来。 SOA服务的理念思想， 本质上是一种业务和技术完全分离，业务又能和技术自由组合的思想 ，它达到了软件设计的最高境界。 SOA是 为软件集成而服务的 ，它实现了技术和架构的完全分离，消除了软件服务集成的所有障碍。 SOA超越了所有的具体技术（如WebService），也超越了所有具体的架构（ESB） ，同时，SOA也包含这些具体的技术和架构。 SOA在Java领域有两套标准： 一个是SUN推出的JBI（没有得到BEA和IBM的承认） ， 另外一个是：IBM和BEA等公司推出的SCA和SDO标准 。 要真正理解什么是SOA需要从软件开发的技术发展史谈起。真正的软件开发从开始到现在经历了四个阶段，也可以说成是四代： 汇编语言开发； 面向过程的软件； 面向对象的组件开发； 面向服务的架构开发，也是今天要谈论的SOA架构； SOA与前面三代的软件开发技术对比， 不同点是SOA超越了软件开发语言本身 。 是一种面向服务的架构，与软件开发语言无关 。

Is it possible to deploy WSO2 ESB 4.9.0 on websphere application server ? Last example found on google is from 2008 ... How is created the required war file ? Thanks From WSO2 Carbon platform 4.0.0 release onwards WSO2 has dropped the official support for hosting WSO2 products on third party containers. So there is no official reference on how to run WSO2 products in third-party containers like WebSphere. One of the main reasons for this is the fact that the WSO2 Carbon container itself is secure enough for any enterprise deployment. Also when you run a server instance like WSO2 BAM, inside a