enterprise

I am currently tasked with creating a documented, consistent Architecture guide for software development. We have a lot of smart people doing the right things, but just not consistently and repeatably. We are using Microsoft’s Application Architecture Guide 2.0 as a starting point. Hence coming up with an Application Architecture is fairly (I won't say easy) straight forward. Possibly because I have a couple of years experience as a developer so I have a pretty good understanding of this realm and there are also loads of examples and guidance. Since our organisation has a couple of

Could you please give advice about choosing between Opensource and Enterprise MongoDB. the main points now are: memory limitation storage limitation failover scalability Is any difference between Open Source and Enterprise MongoDB in this points? Could you please clarify one more important point about the difference between License Commercial and GNU AGPL v3.0. for Mongo? It's all explained on the website . The open source version has no artificial limitations in any of the aspects you mentioned. The advantages of the enterprise version are: MongoDB Management Service (backup and monitoring

I have to find a memory leak in a Java application. I have some experience with this but would like advice on a methodology/strategy for this. Any reference and advice is welcome. About our situation: Heap dumps are larger than 1 GB We have heap dumps from 5 occasions. We don't have any test case to provoke this. It only happens in the (massive) system test environment after at least a weeks usage. The system is built on a internally developed legacy framework with so many design flaws that they are impossible to count them all. Nobody understands the framework in depth. It has been transfered

Is anyone out there using RoR for large scale, business critical enterprise applications? Are there any other lightweight web-frameworks based on dynamic languages that people are using for these types of apps? If you're not using these types of application frameworks what's stopping you? Is it simply the inertia associated with any large IT organization. Are the speed and stability issues of these frameworks enough of a problem that they offset the improvements in development cycle times? In order to consider whether Ruby on Rails is ready for the enterprise, you have to think about what the

I use git for personal projects and think it's great. It's fast, flexible, powerful, and works great for remote development. But now it's mandated at work and, frankly, we're having problems. Out of the box, git doesn't seem to work well for centralized development in a large (20+ developer) organization with developers of varying abilities and levels of git sophistication - especially compared with other source-control systems like Perforce or Subversion, which are aimed at that kind of environment. (Yes, I know, Linus never intended it for that.) But - for political reasons - we're stuck

I'm trying to publish a Chrome Extension in a Private Store and to propagate it with a Group Policy. In order to do that I'm using the following references: CRX Packaging GPO Propagation I'm 100% sure that the GPO is configured correctly (if I use the same GPO to propagate an extension published on the Chrome WebStore it works). Unfortunately, both my private extension (line in the Configure the list of force-installed apps and extension section: [my_extension_id];[my_xml_url] ) and the example extension (line: bcanfnleljfidkjhhfknjjiicdonddad;https://sites.google.com/site/pushcrx

I'm working on an iOS enterprise app that relies on an Configuration Profile being put on the phone. Unfortunately, the user can "cancel" this profile, which really screws with our app. So I was wondering if a) is it possible to prevent a configuration profile from being deleted OR b) is there a way to check to see if a configuration profile is installed already (say, at runtime, then we can just install it again if it's not there)? Taskinul Haque If you want the configuration profile not to be tampered with / disabled by the user, this is possible! If you're using Apple Configurator to build

我这里列举一部分程序员可能比较感兴趣的地方，主要还是我感兴趣的方面。 1. 系统架构 RedHat Enterprise Linux 7.0 支持更多的CPU，内核和内存。只有64位硬件支持RedHat Enterprise Linux 7.0安装。 2. 安装和引导工具 RedHat Enterprise Linux 7.0已重新设计并改进了安装程序 Anaconda ，以便改进RedHat Enterprise Linux 7.0的安装过程。另外，它使用新的引导装载程序GRUB2，该程序比其前任GRUB更具鲁棒性，更方便，也更强大。除Linux文件系统外，GRUB2还支持非Linux文件系统，比如苹果的扩展分层文件系统（HFS+）和微软的NTFS文件系统。 3. XFS文件系统 目前采用Anaconda安装的RedHat Enterprise Linux 7.0中使用的默认文件系统是 XFS ，它替换了在RedHat Enterprise Linux 6中使用的第四代扩展的文件系统（ext4）。ext4和Btrfs（B-Tree）文件系统可作为XFS的备选。XFS是高度可扩展，高性能文件系统，最初由Silicon Graphics, Inc设计，目的是为了支持高达16艾字节（约1600万TB）的文件系统，多达8艾字节（约800万TB）以及包含数千万条目的目录结构