dot

I using dot and Graphviz in doxygen to create a user manual of my code in HTML. The doxygen code looks somewhat like this: /**<br> *@addtogroup MainProgram * @dot * digraph G { * Main [label = "Main()"]; * START [label = "Start"]; * FINISH [label = "Finish"]; * * START -> Main; * Main -> FINISH; * } * * @enddot */ This of course generates a nice picture. Unfortunately, the picture is not displayed the way I want it in the HTML page. It is always centered on page. I want the alignment to be on the left side of the page. The generated HTML code looks like: <div align="center"> <img src="inline

i am using this dot-Code for my Test: digraph G { edge [dir=none]; p1 [shape=circle,style=filled,label="",height="0.01",width="0.01"]; q1 [shape=circle,style=filled,label="",height="0.01",width="0.01"]; q2 [shape=circle,style=filled,label="",height="0.01",width="0.01"]; q3 [shape=circle,style=filled,label="",height="0.01",width="0.01"]; {rank=same; father->p1; mother->p1}; {rank=same; q1->q2->q3}; {rank=same; son1; daughter1; daughter2}; p1->q2; q1->son1; q2->daughter1; q3->daughter2; } My Java Code to create the Graph is the following: Graph graph = null; graph = program.getGraph();

I am looking forward to write a script that will automatically take input from a file and declare the nodes and edges, and produce a graph that can be visualized in any visualization software. I tried dot language and graphViz. This language uses grammar which clearly declare the nodes of the graph like this: node1; , node2; and does not allow any special character except _ . It works well in all the cases but when I want to declare a node named java.lang.object it shows grammatical error because of presence of . and I can't change its grammar. Can anyone help me by suggestion some other

Pre-Script ... And just when I finished producing these example, I saw the 'roundtrip' flow topic , which looks nice. Since I've already put this on here, might as well ask: are there another alternatives? Original Post Is there a way to automatically lay out nodes in a rectangular layout when in a subgraph? As an example, say I have the given structure: digraph { rankdir="LR"; node [ shape="circle", style="bold, filled", fillcolor="#dddddd" ]; a -> b -> c -> d -> e -> f -> g -> h -> b; } This yields the diagram My goal is to have them line up in a rectangle with rows of three nodes, forming

I am using python graph-tool. To draw graphs, it uses graph_draw function . I want to send vertex positions explicitly to dot engine. It turns out that I can pass a property map named pos . I tried defining it as v_pos = g.new_vertex_property("vector<double>") where g is my graph. I am not sure if it is the right way to do it. There is one code snippet which you might find helpful. pos = gt.random_layout(g, shape=shape, dim=3) >>> pos[g.vertex(0)].a array([ 86.59969709, 1.31435598, 0.64651486]) graph_draw(g, pos=pos, output="graph-draw-random.pdf") What should I do if I were to define my

[Environment: graphviz 2.38 / Windows 7] Using dot , I want to produce path diagrams like the following to represent a structural equation model (well, here, just a simple one-factor measurement model). I'd like to use Greek letters for some nodes and edges, and would actually prefer if I could use LaTeX-like notation in the dot file like \ksi , \lambda_1 or \delta_1 This diagram is supposed to represent the three equations \begin{eqnarray*} x_{1i} & = & \lambda_1 \xi_{i} + \delta_{1i} \\ x_{2i} & = & \lambda_2 \xi_{i} + \delta_{2i} \\ x_{3i} & = & \lambda_3 \xi_{i} + \delta_{3i} \end{eqnarray

I try to use dot for drawing a graph, and I have the following problem The label for node b overlaps with the edge from a to b . Is there a way to move this label somehow to avoid this? This is the code I use to generate the image (using dot ) digraph A { rankdir=LR; center=true; margin=0.3; nodesep=1.5; ranksep=0.5; node [shape=point, height=".2", width=".2"]; a [xlabel="a"]; b [xlabel="b"]; c [xlabel="c"]; a -> b -> c; a -> c; } This happens quite often and it's annoying (same here, but with edges): I understand that this is caused by the fact that xlabel s are put after all the things were