documentation-generation

I need to implement a documentation generation solution for my workplace and have narrowed it down to the three mentioned in the title. I have been able to find very little information in the way of formalized comparisons between these solutions, and I'm hoping that those of you with experience in one or more of the above can weigh in: Here is what I have been able to glean from my initial pass: HeaderDoc Pros: Consistent with apple's existing docs, compatibility with making apple docsets HeaderDoc Cons: Difficult to modify behavior, project is not actively worked on, many have switched away

When I create a method comment in Netbeans by typing /** + ENTER I get something like this /** * * @param nameOfParam * @return * @throws SQLException */ but in my case I like comments looking like this /** * * @param * nameOfParam - * @return * @throws SQLException */ So I need to change this template but I can't find where. I can change every single behavior of Netbeans besides this one. Can somebody help? Method comment templates cannot be customized to the level which is expected in this question. These customization features can be added to the NetBeans IDE and there is a specific way how

I have some module-level variables that have long and uninteresting values which I would like to exclude from auto-generated documentation. Is there a way to do this? For example, in my Python source I have something like #:This is a variable with a log value. long_variable = "Some really long value that is not really of interest and just kind of gets in the way of reading and understanding what's going on." and in my Sphinx source I have .. automodule:: the_module :members: and I want the documentation to omit the variable value. How do I omit the value of variables on Sphinx? Is there ay way

Is it possible to include .R files in the data directory of my package in the roxygen process? I have put several .R files in the data directory. When they are sourced with data(), they read in raw data files and perform some transformations. Roxygen can be used anywhere within an R file (in other words, it doesn't have to be followed by a function). It can also be used to document any docType in the R documentation. So you can just document your data in a separate block (something like this): #' This is data to be included in my package #' #' @name data-name #' @docType data #' @author My

Many languages support documentation comments to allow a generator (like javadoc or doxygen ) to generate code documentation by parsing that same code. Does Swift have any type documentation comment feature like this? Documentation comments are supported natively in Xcode, producing smartly rendered documentation in Quick Help (both in the popover when ⌥ -clicking symbols, and in the Quick Help Inspector ⌥⌘2 ). Symbol documentation comments are now based on the same Markdown syntax used by rich playground comments, so a lot of what you can do in playgrounds can now be used directly in source