discovery

stack@zuul:~/cinder_for_submit/cinder/cinder/volume$ sed -n '2544,2569p' driver.py def _do_iscsi_discovery(self, volume): # TODO(justinsb): Deprecate discovery and use stored info # NOTE(justinsb): Discovery won't work with CHAP-secured targets (?) LOG.warning("ISCSI provider_location not stored, using discovery") volume_name = volume['name'] try: # NOTE(griff) We're doing the split straight away which should be # safe since using '@' in hostname is considered invalid (out, _err) = self._execute('iscsiadm', '-m', 'discovery', '-t', 'sendtargets', '-p', volume['host'].split('@')[0], run_as_root

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have use SNMP v1 and 2c for network discovery of printers by sending broadcast message with community "public" and it works just fine, but when I send broadcast message with version 3 of the protocol I got timeout error. Do somebody share example of SNMPv3 device discovery? Thank you. 回答1: Two things: 1) Doing a broadcast SNMPv1/v2c is actually not defined to work in the protocol. Cheap implementations will simply respond, as you've found, to any packet it sees that the kernel accepts to the port and not check the address. However, you'll

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I am migrating an application to Java EE 7 and would like to CDI 1.1. But I don't get the meaning of bean-discovery-mode="annotated" . The CDI 1.1 specification is not very helpful. At least I have not found any usefull paragraph. Did I miss it? This example runs perfectly with bean-discovery-mode="all" and injects an instance of LoggingClass : public class LoggingClass { public Logger logger = Logger.getLogger("ALOGGER"); } @Test public class MMLoggerProducerIT extends Arquillian { @Inject private LoggingClass lc; } But if I change from

In the course of the last weeks, Android's NSD implementation is making me go mad: From a user's point of view, the following problems arise: Devices discover each other in a completely non-deterministic fashion. If I launch my NsdManager -based app, it works more or less if only two devices are involved. If a third device joins, it will seldomly discover the first two , and the first two will not see the third. If I exit the apps (they gracefully unregister the NSD listeners) and restart them in a different order, the discovery pattern is not exactly the same, but similar. In my home network,

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: I am having a issue with UdpTarget.Discovery(SecParam) in various servers (Linux variants) where SNMP is setup. In those servers where both V1 and V3 targets are defined the Discovery works and returns as true. Where the V1 target is not defined (i.e., v1 community string is not configured) and only V3 is defined, the UdpTarget.Discovery(SecParam) fails with the error message : Request has reached maximum retries.. The relevant part of code is IpAddress agent = new IpAddress ( ip ); UdpTarget target = new UdpTarget (( IPAddress )

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: compose.yml file, which looks like this: version : '2' services : discovery - microservice : build : discovery - microservice context : /discovery-microservice/ target / docker dockerfile : Dockerfile ports : - "8761:8761" While I am executing it I get the following error: yaml . scanner . ScannerError : mapping values are not allowed here in "C:\...\docker-compose.yml" , line 5 , column 14 From what I see, nothing is wrong with the format, e.g. whitespaces missing. My overall goal is to specify a development mode docker-compose

I would like to perform a thorough LAN devices discovery, so that I can create a diagram similar to the one attached, but with additional information like IP and MAC addresses. I've tried the code from Torry: type PNetResourceArray = ^TNetResourceArray; TNetResourceArray = array[0..100] of TNetResource; function CreateNetResourceList(ResourceType: DWord; NetResource: PNetResource; out Entries: DWord; out List: PNetResourceArray): Boolean; var EnumHandle: THandle; BufSize: DWord; Res: DWord; begin Result := False; List := Nil; Entries := 0; if WNetOpenEnum(RESOURCE_GLOBALNET, ResourceType, 0,

Discovery of Causal Time Intervals. 推荐论文： Discovery of Causal Time Intervals 对时序因果关系的 Granger causality test 的一种剪枝优化。 PcAlg算法 相关论文下载 Download 提取码：8ymj 原Git地址 目前还是初学者呢，前置技能还是要多学 喜欢这篇文章吗，不妨分享给朋友们吧！ 来源：51CTO 作者： BoogieLingo 链接：https://blog.csdn.net/qq_18797303/article/details/100129093

上一篇进行Netflix Zuul 1.0 与 gateway的对比。今天来介绍一下 zuul的搭建及应用 Zuul 工程创建 工程创建 cloud-gateway-zuul。还是基于之前的工程 pom文件导入 <parent> <artifactId>spring-cloud-alibaba-basis</artifactId> <groupId>com.xian.cloud</groupId> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> </parent> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <artifactId>cloud-gateway-zuul</artifactId> <name>网关服务zuul</name> <dependencies> <!-- 注册中心 --> <dependency> <groupId>com.alibaba.cloud</groupId> <artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-alibaba-nacos-discovery</artifactId> </dependency> <!-- 配置中心 --> <dependency> <groupId>com.alibaba.cloud</groupId> <artifactId>spring-cloud