dependency-management

问题 Basically, I am using javascript to scrape data from Google Play store using: 1-Request 2-Cheerios 3-QueryString I used Google Market API from Github which uses require as following: var request = require('request'); var cheerio = require('cheerio'); var qs = require('querystring'); But I am getting the following ReferenceError: require is not defined ... So, I don't have require in javascript which is either new for me or this is something out of the ordinary. 回答1: RequireJS is a JavaScript

问题 I've got a multi module project that uses war overlays and we have a continuous integration server that often deploys the snapshots. I have questions like, if I do a mvn compile right after the CI server does a deploy of it, will my build get my local changes or the CI changes? How do I force my project to use a war overlay I've changed locally? I figure an install could do that, but what if the CI server builds a version with a newer timestamp. Which one will it use? This is just a few of

问题 In current project most of transitive artifacts are marked as "provided" (due to some of "best practices" of project architecture - I can't change this behavior). But I need to get whole list of their to make project alive. How I can calculate whole list of artifacts, including provided? How to override "provided" scope of transitive artifact? Okay. There is an sample of my case: <!-- sample of my pom is so:--> <project> ..... <group>rd-service</group> <artifactId>rd-service</artifactId> ....

问题 once again it has happened... I joined a new project, composed of several plain Eclipse Java Projects, with interdependencies, all managed through the Project build path. I find this all a bit of a chaos. And when it comes to run configurations - you just enter hell. In the past I've sticked to create plug-in projects, instead of plain Java projects - even if I never intend to run these projects as osgi-bundles. I just find that dependencies are way easier to manage in plug-in projects. Are

问题 I was following this question but it doesn't answer my question completely. What is real advantage of apklib from jar? Possible answers: It contains resources But I can easily put resources to jar file as well It contains already prepared android classes But if I open apklib I don't see dex or something other related to android. Even more I see plain sources inside. So what is real purpose to keep/distribute library in apklib format? 回答1: But I can easily put resources to jar file as well No,

问题 I'm running a project that has a dependency on groovy 1.7-beta-1. The gmaven plugin uses groovy version 1.6 as a dependency. In my pom, I specify in the dependency management section the grooyv-all version as : <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId> <artifactId>groovy-all</artifactId> <version>1.7-beta-1</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> Yet when I run maven in debug mode I see that groovy 1.6 is being used for a

问题 First let me explain that I come from the Python world, where I can do what I want like this in the shell: $ export PYTHONPATH=~/myroot $ mkdir -p ~/myroot/mypkg $ touch ~/myroot/mypkg/__init__.py # this is the one bit of "magic" for Python $ echo 'hello = "world"' > ~/myroot/mypkg/mymodule.py Then in Python: >>> import mypkg.mymodule >>> mypkg.mymodule.hello 'world' What I did there was to create a package which is easily extended by other users. I can check in ~/myroot/mypkg to source

问题 My project and my parent pom both have a dependency management section. These sections both have direct entries and "imports" of boms (i.e. poms that purely consist of dependecyManagement and are imported). Now I try to figure out the evaluation order. My best guess: parent pom imports child pom imports parent pom direct dependencyManagement entries child pom direct dependencyManagement entries This means that later elements overwrite earlier elements. Is this correct? If so, can I change

问题 I have declared a dependency for org.spockframework:spock-spring:1.1.d91bf785-groovy-2.4 , but in runtime scope it is overridden to 1.0-groovy-2.4 . Is there a way to figure out which dependency is overriding it? 1.0-groovy-2.4 is not present in any gradle file locally, and it is not visible when I run gradle dependencies in the shared-config project. Here's gradle dependencies from the main-web project: testCompile [...] +--- project :shared-config | [...] | +--- org.spockframework:spock

问题 I just got acquainted with extend.js, and was wondering if there's an added value to using the library over using native JavaScript. Let me demonstrate; With extend.js , I would declare a namespace like so: extend('some.madeup.namespace',{ foo : 'bar' }); … whereas without it, I'd only have to do that: var some = { madeup : { namespace : { foo : 'bar' } } }; I'm a firm believer in the KISS principle, and I really think external dependencies should be reduced to make things a little bit