dependencies

问题 Please note , not interested in using the Google-Eclipse plugin; I want to manage all dependencies manually. Just downloaded the GWT 2.5.1 SDK and am looking at all the JARs it ships with: gwt-api-checker.jar requestfactory-apt-src.jar gwt-codeserver.jar requestfactory-client.jar gwt-dev.jar requestfactory-client-src.jar gwt-elemental.jar requestfactory-client+src.jar gwt-servlet-deps.jar requestfactory-server.jar gwt-servlet.jar requestfactory-server-src.jar gwt-soyc-vis.jar requestfactory

问题 Please note , not interested in using the Google-Eclipse plugin; I want to manage all dependencies manually. Just downloaded the GWT 2.5.1 SDK and am looking at all the JARs it ships with: gwt-api-checker.jar requestfactory-apt-src.jar gwt-codeserver.jar requestfactory-client.jar gwt-dev.jar requestfactory-client-src.jar gwt-elemental.jar requestfactory-client+src.jar gwt-servlet-deps.jar requestfactory-server.jar gwt-servlet.jar requestfactory-server-src.jar gwt-soyc-vis.jar requestfactory

问题 I have a makefile snippet: all: $(objects) fresh: all | clean directory directory: ;mkdir -p OutputDirectory clean: ;rm $(objects); rm -rf OutputDirectory Here, I want to ensure that when I do make fresh - clean should succeed by directory which should be followed by all . Semantically, here it might not make sense for clean to be order only prerequisite. Assume it to some order only dependency that has to be executed in some order. The following link shows similar problem but for normal

问题 From the doc I can't figure out the right way to include my JS files into Sage theme. What's the correct procedure for this? 回答1: Including custom script (not installed via bower package manager) You can use scripts/**/* glob pattern. This will bundle all scripts that are inside assets/scripts/ directory into dist/scripts/main.js file. Edit your assets/manifest.json like this: { "dependencies": { "main.js": { "vendor": [ // Your external libs that are not available via bower ] "files": [

问题 So I have this import cycle which I'm trying to solve. I have this following pattern: view/ - view.go action/ - action.go - register.go And the general idea is that actions are performed on a view, and are executed by the view: // view.go type View struct { Name string } // action.go func ChangeName(v *view.View) { v.Name = "new name" } // register.go const Register = map[string]func(v *view.View) { "ChangeName": ChangeName, } And then in view.go we invoke this: func (v *View) doThings() { if

问题 When I walk through the gradle dsl guide, I notice the DependencyHandler. It's delegated to closure when execute dependencies method. Just like dependencies { compile 'commons-lang:commons-lang:2.6' } The point I can't understand is why "compile 'commons-lang:commons-lang:2.6'" caused the method "add(configurationName, dependencyNotation)" be invoked. 回答1: Internally Gradle uses Groovy's metaprogramming features, specifically methodMissing, to implement this capability. You can see how this

问题 (Yes, this is hacky and probably not best practice, but it is the least bulky solution) I have a project that involves several jars - a runnable launcher, a server, a wrapper for the server, and plugins for the server. The launcher runs the wrapper by starting a new unconnected process, a child process, or just by instantiating it, depending on config. This should be unimportant with regards to the issue. The wrapper uses URLClassLoader to load the server jar and start it, which works fine.

问题 I have a project's build.sbt which is using : libraryDependencies ++= Seq( "com.lerestau" % "killer-launcher" % "1.0.2", "com.lerestau" % "menu-starter" % "1.0.0" ) menu-starter transitively downloading "killer-launcher" % "0.0.8" and Hence getting errors in current project. Is there any way to resolve this sort of conflict. I came up with dependencyOverrides , but that works if conflict is entirely binary. That didn't work. How to resolve in SBT ? 回答1: The following should get rid of the

问题 Is it possible to exclude a package from an Android Gradle dependency so it does not end up inside the APK? As: dependencies { compile('com.facebook.android:facebook-android-sdk:4.17.0') { exclude package 'com.facebook.share' } } but then different, because "package" is not a valid command. 回答1: You can't exclude some specific parts of the artifact because Gradle doesn't know anything about what is inside it. To Gradle it's monolithic: you either include the artifact with whatever is inside

问题 Is it possible to exclude a package from an Android Gradle dependency so it does not end up inside the APK? As: dependencies { compile('com.facebook.android:facebook-android-sdk:4.17.0') { exclude package 'com.facebook.share' } } but then different, because "package" is not a valid command. 回答1: You can't exclude some specific parts of the artifact because Gradle doesn't know anything about what is inside it. To Gradle it's monolithic: you either include the artifact with whatever is inside