default

MySQL #1364 - Field 'column_name' doesn't have a default value - Can't insert into DB [duplicate]

[亡魂溺海] 提交于 2019-12-01 15:34:55
问题 This question already has answers here : mysql error 1364 Field doesn't have a default values (15 answers) Closed 3 years ago . I recently moved my MySQL database to a new server and it has given me some problems i have newer experienced with MySQL before. My table columns are set to "Default => None" and my table has been generating the default value depending on the Datatype. But now when i try to insert into a table i'm getting this error message: "#1364 - Field 'column_name' doesn't have

“There is no default constructor available in android.database.sqlite.SQLitepenhelper” in Android Studio

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-01 15:19:24
问题 Trying to extend class with SQLiteOpenHelper, but this error shows up : "There is no default constructor available in android.database.sqlite.SQLitepenhelper" along with other "cannot resolve symbol Category, Note,..." class DbHelper extends SQLiteOpenHelper { @Override public void onCreate(SQLiteDatabase db) { db.execSQL(Category.getSql()); db.execSQL(Note.getSql()); db.execSQL(Attachment.getSql()); db.execSQL(CheckItem.getSql()); } @Override public void onUpgrade(SQLiteDatabase db, int

Default Initialization Versus Zero Initialization

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2019-12-01 12:48:51
I cannot understand the behavior of gcc 4.8.1 or Visual Studio 2015 with respect to default initialization versus value initialization. It doesn't help that I'm trying to understand the differences between these myself and possibly running into compiler bugs? My question is: Can someone explain this behavior? And ideally tell me what should be happening. I have two classes: class Foo{ int _bar; public: void printBar(){ cout << _bar << endl; } }; class bar{ int ent; public: int getEnt(){return ent;} }; I'm using the following code to test: int main() { Foo foo; foo.printBar(); Foo().printBar();

Writing a Default Constructor Forces Zero-Initialization?

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-12-01 11:00:51
These are my class definitions: class Foo{ int _ent; public: void printEnt() const{cout << _ent << ' ';} }; class Bar{ Foo _foo; public: void printEnt() const{_foo.printEnt();} }; And this is my test code: char* buf = new char[sizeof(Foo) + sizeof(Foo) + sizeof(Bar)]; fill(buf, buf + sizeof(Foo) + sizeof(Foo) + sizeof(Bar), 'J'); cout << ((int*)buf)[0] << ' ' << ((int*)buf)[1] << ' ' << ((int*)buf)[2] << endl; Foo* first = new (buf) Foo; Foo* second = new (buf + sizeof(Foo)) Foo(); Bar* third = new (buf + sizeof(Foo) * 2) Bar; first->printEnt(); second->printEnt(); third->printEnt(); My output

Default parameter as generic type

我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-12-01 10:49:53
I have protocol and his implementation written in Swift: protocol P { } struct A: P { } Protocol is used as generic type for some function: func foo<T: P>(param: T) { } func foo() { foo(param: A()) } Until now everything works properly. But I would like to set A() as a default parameter of given function: func foo<T: P>(param: T = A()) { } Unfortunately with following error: Default argument value of type 'A' cannot be converted to type 'T'. Or func foo<T: P>(param: T = A() as P) { } , let a: P = A() func foo<T: P>(param: T = a) { } Returns: Default argument value of type 'P' cannot be

default arguments in constructor

此生再无相见时 提交于 2019-12-01 10:36:39
Can I use default arguments in a constructor like this maybe Soldier(int entyID, int hlth = 100, int exp = 10, string nme) : entityID(entyID = globalID++), health(hlth), experience(exp), name(nme = SelectRandomName(exp)) { } I want for example exp = 10 by default but be able to override this value if I supply it in the constructor otherwise it should use the default. How can I do this, I know my approach does not work.... If I supply any value in the initialization list no matter whatever I supply in constructor gets overwritten ofcourse on the other hand whenever I supply a value in

Symfony2 - Twig : Set the default value in the dropdownlist

血红的双手。 提交于 2019-12-01 09:01:47
问题 I have a Form in my twig template. One of the form fields is a dropdownlist that is created from an Entity in my form builder. I would like to set the default value in my dropdown list, to be the id 28 for example. I don't know how to do this in twig. I tryed this: {{ form_widget(form.type, {value: 28 } ) }} But nothing changed, I still have the firs value that is by default. I know that I can set a default value in the FormType class where I am creating my form builder, but I am looking for

Writing a Default Constructor Forces Zero-Initialization?

左心房为你撑大大i 提交于 2019-12-01 08:41:57
问题 These are my class definitions: class Foo{ int _ent; public: void printEnt() const{cout << _ent << ' ';} }; class Bar{ Foo _foo; public: void printEnt() const{_foo.printEnt();} }; And this is my test code: char* buf = new char[sizeof(Foo) + sizeof(Foo) + sizeof(Bar)]; fill(buf, buf + sizeof(Foo) + sizeof(Foo) + sizeof(Bar), 'J'); cout << ((int*)buf)[0] << ' ' << ((int*)buf)[1] << ' ' << ((int*)buf)[2] << endl; Foo* first = new (buf) Foo; Foo* second = new (buf + sizeof(Foo)) Foo(); Bar* third

How can “default” values in overridden WinForm controls be prevented?

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-12-01 08:37:31
I'm trying to learn and grasp what and how C# does things. I'm historically a Visual Foxpro (VFP) developer, and somewhat spoiled at the years of visual inheritance by creating my own baseline of user controls to be used application wide. In trying to learn the parallels in C#, I am stuck on something. Say I derive my own label control (control is subclass of label) defined with a font "Arial", 10 point. Then, on any form I add it to, the Designer will automatically pre-fill in some property values which can be seen in the "Designer.cs" portion of the Form class. this.LabelHdr2.AutoSize = true

Default parameter as generic type

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-12-01 08:25:42
问题 I have protocol and his implementation written in Swift: protocol P { } struct A: P { } Protocol is used as generic type for some function: func foo<T: P>(param: T) { } func foo() { foo(param: A()) } Until now everything works properly. But I would like to set A() as a default parameter of given function: func foo<T: P>(param: T = A()) { } Unfortunately with following error: Default argument value of type 'A' cannot be converted to type 'T'. Or func foo<T: P>(param: T = A() as P) { } , let a: