decompiling

I'm trying to understand if there's a reason in the spec for the discrepany between java descriptors and signatures for inner classes. (I'm looking directly at the content of the class files here, but I use javap to illustrate). ( n.b. I have tried this on JDK 1.6.0_33 and 1.7.0_05, both have the same issue when viewed with javap from Java 7 - java 6's javap doesn't seem to show any generic signature info, as per Sean's answer below. ) Update : Thanks to those discussing - my take is The descriptor (which doesn't contain generic information) is correct. The signature (which is an attribute of

When decompiling a specific jar using java decompiler (http://java.decompiler.free.fr/) I got some strange code I cannot identify what is. can someone help me? the code is something like: Foo.access$004(Foo.this); or this Bar.access$006(Bar.this); or else Baz.access$102(Baz.this, true) What are these methods access$004 , access$006 and access$102 ? Synthetic methods like this get created to support acessing private methods of inner classes. Since inner classes were not part of the initial jvm version, the access modifiers could not really handle this case. The solution was to create additional

I'm trying to find a constant (something like a secret token) from inside of an iOS app in order to build an app using an undocumented web API (by the way, I'm not into something illegal). So far, I have the decrypted app executable on my Mac (jailbreak + SSH + dumping decrypted executable as file). I can use the strings command to get a readable list of strings, and I can use the class-dump tool ( http://stevenygard.com/projects/class-dump/ ) to get a list of interface definitions (headers) of the classes. Although this gives me an idea of the app's inner workings, I still can't find what I'm

Has any work been done on the direct conversion of CIL to LINQ expression trees? This would include class libraries, blogs, books, academic papers, etc. What are the known mismatches between CIL and LINQ Expression API? I have seen a project that significantly extended the Expression API to support an almost complete mapping between C# and LINQ Expressions. What work arounds would be suggested to accommodate any of these mismatches? Is there something fundamentally wrong about converting directly from CIL to LINQ Expressions? If so, why? 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12824201/how-to

Well, I guess subject says it all :) The ideal solution would find all jars within a certain folder (they might be in sub-folders), and write all the sources found into a single "src" directory, of course maintaing the package folders. Concrete use case: decompile all Eclipse plugin jars dogbane Download JAD Decompiler . Unjar all your jar files (using the command jar xvf ) to some directory. Let's call this ${unjar.dir} . Create a directory for JAD to write out the decompiled sources. Let's call this ${target.dir} . Execute the following command: jad -o -r -sjava -d${target.dir} ${unjar.dir}/

How can I get a list of all the dynamic libraries that is required by an elf binary in linux using C++? Once I've managed to extract the information (filename?) from the binary I can find the actual file by searching through the PATH , but I haven't been able to find any information regarding extracting unmangled information from the ELF binary. Thoughts? The list of required shared objects is stored in the so-called dynamic section of the executable. The rough algorithm of getting the necessary info would be something like this: Parse the ELF header , check that the file is a dynamic