crud

I'd like to create a new Woocommerce product programmatically with PHP code and I have tried it with the Woocommerce 3 CRUD methods: //Woocommerce CRUD $objProduct = new WC_Product_Simple(); $objProduct->set_name('My Product 1'); //Set product name. $objProduct->set_status('publish'); //Set product status. //$objProduct->set_featured(FALSE); //Set if the product is featured. | bool $objProduct->set_catalog_visibility('visible'); //Set catalog visibility. | string $visibility Options: 'hidden', 'visible', 'search' and 'catalog'. $objProduct->set_description('My custom long description'); //Set

Think about a simple Rails scaffold application with a "new" action containing a form to add records to a database with a "save" button. After the "create" action the controller redirects to the "show" action, where the user can use the "edit" link to edit the just inserted record. So far, so simple. But if the user instead uses the browser's back button after creating a record to get back to the "new" action, the browser shows the form with the values the user just has entered. Now he changes some values and presses "save" again. He thinks that this would change the record, but of course this

I'm submitting a form for a StoredProcedureReport , which has many StoredProcedureParameters . Create works fine, but trying to update has left me asking whether or not Microsoft can seriously be serious. I come from a Rails background where @report.update_attributes(params[:report]) will know exactly what to do with whatever association data it finds within. From what I can tell, the .NET equivalent of this is TryUpdateModel , which looked promising. At first. So I tried it with some params like this IDGUID:d70008a5-a1a3-03d2-7baa-e39c5044ad41 StoredProcedureName:GetUsers Name:search again

I have just finished reading an article on MSDN by John Evdemon . He bashes the CRUD interfaces and calls it an anti-pattern. While I agree that having ANYTHING stateful is difficult and Current and MoveNext are bad ideas I don't agree that CRUD as in Create Read Update and Delete are bad. If I have a car service and I want to let clients be able to do the basics, as in Create a car, get a cars details, update a cars details or delete a car then how are they meant to be able to do those things without CRUD operations. Or what am I missing here? Ladislav Mrnka The CRUD interfaces should be

My question is quite simple. What is the best way to bring CRUD into a use-case diagram? It should be DRY . I know, UML is sometimes discretionary, but what do you think about it? Some ideas: 1 use-case diagram Not really DRY, if there are a few CRUD objects. 2 use-case diagram Not really DRY, if there are a few CRUD objects. 3 use-case diagram I prefer this. Update 4 use-case diagram (@Uffe) Note maybe needless, when it is described in the documentation? 5 use-case diagram (@home @Uffe) Out of these, I would say #3 is actually the worst, because "CRUD" on its own is not a use case at all; you

I got multiple EntititySets which I want to update in my SAP Backend, therefore I fetch my data (payload) as JSON and put it in a request (its successfully in the node "data"): Code: var oTreeJSON = oTreeTable.getModel().getProperty("/root"); var oModel = sap.ui.getCore().getModel(); var batchChanges = []; for (var i = 0; i < oTreeAll.length; i++) { batchChanges.push(oModel.createBatchOperation("/sap/opu/odata/sap/MY_SERVICE/?$batch", "POST", oTreeAll[i])); } oModel.submitBatch(); My Request looks like this: Where should it arrive in SAP (which method)? What am I doing wrong, there is no error

i'm making a CRUD from a tutorial. And i'm getting this error. You have specified an invalid database connection group. What would be the problem? database.php - database config $db['default']['hostname'] = 'localhost'; $db['default']['username'] = 'root'; $db['default']['password'] = ''; $db['default']['database'] = 'cicrud'; $db['default']['dbdriver'] = 'mysql'; $db['default']['dbprefix'] = ''; $db['default']['pconnect'] = TRUE; $db['default']['db_debug'] = TRUE; $db['default']['cache_on'] = FALSE; $db['default']['cachedir'] = ''; $db['default']['char_set'] = 'utf8'; $db['default']['dbcollat

I am able to get a generic notification "that there was a change to the contacts DB", but I want to know the specific record that was inserted, updated, or deleted. Following is the code that gets registered and gets the onChange notification. Unfortunately, it is not specific which makes my processing exhaustive and inefficient. Here is the code stub: if ((mNativeContactsObserver == null) && (mHandler == null)) { mHandler = new Handler(this.getMainLooper()) { }; mNativeContactsObserver = new ContentObserver(mHandler) { @Override public void onChange(boolean selfChange) { super.onChange