control-flow

Looping backwards through javascript array with array.length using a for-loop

Deadly 提交于 2019-12-02 20:06:17
问题 If I have an array = [8,7,6,5,4] that I want to loop through, why does the following for loop still work yet the length of the array is 5 and there is no element at index 5 of the array? for(let i=array.length;i>=0;i++){ //do something } I know that it would be more accurate to subtract 1 from the length, but why does the code above still work 回答1: Almost. You have to: Decrease i instead of increasing it, and Start from array.length-1 , because array indexes start from 0, not 1. So use

Unreachable statement error using while loop in java [duplicate]

佐手、 提交于 2019-12-02 04:25:32
问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 6 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Why is this code giving an “Unreachable Statement” error? This seems very easy question, I found this question in one book. If anyone help me to figure out why I'm getting error. do { System.out.print("inside do"); } while (false); while (false) { // error System.out.print("inside while"); } System.out.print("outside"); I thought, and according to me, output should be inside dooutside . But, it is showing

Unreachable statement error using while loop in java [duplicate]

Deadly 提交于 2019-12-02 00:56:03
Possible Duplicate: Why is this code giving an “Unreachable Statement” error? This seems very easy question, I found this question in one book. If anyone help me to figure out why I'm getting error. do { System.out.print("inside do"); } while (false); while (false) { // error System.out.print("inside while"); } System.out.print("outside"); I thought, and according to me, output should be inside dooutside . But, it is showing Compiler Error : Unreachable Statement . Then, I tried to figure out, why, it is showing Compilation error : Unreachable Statement* . So, I change the above code like this

Exceptions for flow of control

血红的双手。 提交于 2019-12-02 00:41:57
问题 There is an interesting post over here about this, in relation to cross-application flow of control. Well, recently, I've come across an interesting problem. Generating the nth value in a potentially (practically) endless recursive sequence. This particular algorithm WILL be in atleast 10-15 stack references deep at the point that it succeeds. My first thought was to throw a SuccessException that looked something like this (C#): class SuccessException : Exception { public string Value { get;

Exceptions for flow of control

。_饼干妹妹 提交于 2019-12-01 21:45:52
There is an interesting post over here about this, in relation to cross-application flow of control. Well, recently, I've come across an interesting problem. Generating the nth value in a potentially (practically) endless recursive sequence. This particular algorithm WILL be in atleast 10-15 stack references deep at the point that it succeeds. My first thought was to throw a SuccessException that looked something like this (C#): class SuccessException : Exception { public string Value { get; set; } public SuccessException(string value) : base() { Value = value; } } Then do something like this:

Why are simple for loop expressions restricted to integer ranges?

南笙酒味 提交于 2019-12-01 15:06:30
According to the F# spec (see §6.5.7 ), simple for loops are bounded by integer ( int aka int32 aka System.Int32 ) limits start and stop , e.g. for i = start to stop do // do sth. I wonder why the iteration bounds for this type of for loop are required to be int32 . Why not allow uint32 ? int64 ? bigint ? I'm aware that sequence iteration expressions ( for ... in ... ) can iterate over arbitrary sequences; that however requires allocating an iterator and calling MoveNext and Current and what not and can thus be considerably less efficient than a plain loop could be (increment counter, compare,

Why are simple for loop expressions restricted to integer ranges?

谁说胖子不能爱 提交于 2019-12-01 13:58:25
问题 According to the F# spec (see §6.5.7), simple for loops are bounded by integer ( int aka int32 aka System.Int32 ) limits start and stop , e.g. for i = start to stop do // do sth. I wonder why the iteration bounds for this type of for loop are required to be int32 . Why not allow uint32 ? int64 ? bigint ? I'm aware that sequence iteration expressions ( for ... in ... ) can iterate over arbitrary sequences; that however requires allocating an iterator and calling MoveNext and Current and what

R: How to use ifelse statement for a vector of characters

为君一笑 提交于 2019-12-01 12:42:31
I am trying to solve a quiz using R, but my code does not work properly. I tried debugging, but it seems that the ifelse statement fails to work at certain numbers that seem pretty random. Here is the quiz: http://puzzles.nigelcoldwell.co.uk/six.htm switches <- rep("off", 100) for(i in 1:100){ k <- c(seq(i, 100, i)) ifelse(switches[k] == "off", switches[k] <- "on", switches[k] <- "off") } When I run this code, I get "on" for 14, 22, 26, 30, 34, etc in which I should have got "off." Is there a mistake in the way I applied ifelse statement to a vector with vectorized index? The ifelse syntax

R: How to use ifelse statement for a vector of characters

喜欢而已 提交于 2019-12-01 09:59:45
问题 I am trying to solve a quiz using R, but my code does not work properly. I tried debugging, but it seems that the ifelse statement fails to work at certain numbers that seem pretty random. Here is the quiz: http://puzzles.nigelcoldwell.co.uk/six.htm switches <- rep("off", 100) for(i in 1:100){ k <- c(seq(i, 100, i)) ifelse(switches[k] == "off", switches[k] <- "on", switches[k] <- "off") } When I run this code, I get "on" for 14, 22, 26, 30, 34, etc in which I should have got "off." Is there a

Exit in For loop - Windows Command Processor (CMD.EXE)

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-12-01 05:43:41
I am trying to find way to break / exit from FOR loop, if there are any error occured. Below is content of batch file. @echo on set myfile=D:\sample.txt FOR /F "tokens=1,2 delims=," %%i in (%myfile%) do call :process "%%i" :process set recfile=%1% echo %recfile% echo "Step in Test1" echo %errorlevel% pause; exit /B 0 If %errorlevel% NEQ 0 goto :fail1 :fail1 echo "Step in fail1" pause; exit /B 9993 :EOF Sample.txt has multiple records. If there are any error occured then I am expecting to exit the batch file rather then checking the complete sample.txt file. e.g. on statement echo %recfile%, If