connection-pooling

From my understanding, .Net will pool SqlConnection objects where the connection string is the same by default. Will the connection still be pooled if I call the Dispose method? This question is asked under the context of an ASP.NET application that at times makes many hits to the database in a single PageLoad event. I want the connections to be pooled, but would like confirmation that Closing and Disposing of the connection once the data operation is complete does not interfere with .NET's handling of the connection pool. When using connection pooling, closing a SqlConnection simply tells the

I came across below text while reading about Database Connection pool properties: The maximum pool size property specifies the maximum number of available and borrowed (in use) connections that a pool maintains. If the maximum number of connections are borrowed, no connections will be available until a connection is returned to the pool. This property allows the number of connections in the pool to increase as demand increases. At the same time, the property ensures that the pool doesn't grow to the point of exhausting a system's resources, which ultimately affects an application's performance

I have written following properties in my configuration files I am using Log4j in my application When I am running a project. I am getting following message.does that mean connection pooling is configured in my project? if not then how it will be? INFO: internal.ConnectionProviderInitiator - HHH000130: Instantiating explicit connection provider: com.zaxxer.hikari.hibernate.HikariConnectionProvider I have referred following link also link here Datasource settings hibernate.datasource.driver-class-name=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver hibernate.datasource.url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mydb hibernate

I used singleton pattern to get jdbc connection for my standalone application. The code is as following. public static synchronized MysqlConnect getDbCon() { if ( db == null ) { db = new MysqlConnect(); } return db; } But I saw in many discussions singleton in not good for getting connection. Is it true? And the suggested using connection pooling. Can anyone give me a good implementation of connection pooling to use instead of the above code? Here's a simple, singleton based implementation of a connection pool. This connection pool supports getting a connection using either the DriverManager

I am trying to configure a JMS connection pool in spring/camel for Websphere MQ. I am seeing class cast exception, when tried to use CachingConnectionFactory from spring. Could not find a pool from WMQ, have anybody done connection pooling with WMQ, i didnt find any examples. There are lot of examples for ActiveMQ. here is what i have so far, that is producing class cast exception. <bean id="inCachingConnectionFactory" class="org.springframework.jms.connection.CachingConnectionFactory"> <property name="targetConnectionFactory" ref="inboundMqConnectionFactory1" /> <property name=

I have a server application that uses the Tomcat JDBC connection pool. This is the code I use to create the DataSource: PoolProperties connProperties = new PoolProperties(); connProperties.setUrl(resources.getProperty("db.url")); connProperties.setDriverClassName(resources.getProperty("db.driver")); connProperties.setUsername(resources.getProperty("db.user")); connProperties.setPassword(resources.getProperty("db.password")); connProperties.setJmxEnabled(true); connProperties.setTestWhileIdle(false); connProperties.setValidationQuery("SELECT 1"); connProperties.setTestOnReturn(false);

I am creating a multi-threaded application. However, I have experienced lots of unexpected behavior from my application when I have one connection object serving all threads. I am in a dilemma. Should I let every thread create, use and dispose its own connection object or should I use a connection pool? I have tried connection pooling which makes the application painfully shower. However, my intuition is that if I let every thread create its own connection object, I might get a "too many connection" error. Please let me know if there is any way to assist in this. Regards. Regardless of the