conflict

I'm working on something similar to a pastebin (yeah, it's that generic) but allowing for multiple user editing. The obvious problem is that of multiple users attempting to edit the same file. I'm thinking along the lines of locking down the file when one user is working on it (it's not the best solution, but I don't need anything too complex), but to prevent/warn the user I'd obviously need a system for monitoring each user's edit sessions. Working with database and ajax, I'm thinking of two solutions. The first would be to have the edit page ping the server at a arbitrary interval, say a

I use jquery for a module. My joomla template have an integrated jquery menu. So they conflict with each other. Is there a way to solve this problem. Following the script code of the module <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> window.onload = function () { var container = jQuery('div.sliderGallery'); var ul = jQuery('ul', container); var itemsWidth = ul.innerWidth() - container.outerWidth(); jQuery('.slider', container).slider({ min: 0, max: itemsWidth, handle: '.handle', stop: function (event, ui) { ul.animate({'left' : ui.value * -1},340); }, slide: function (event, ui) { ul.css(

Is there any way to specify to git to automatically resolve the conflicts for a pack of files by taking the remote version for each of them? For instance, to take the remote version of each files in a certain directory? git-merge seems to support only the "ours" strategy, where the result of a merge is the local version. And that only for the whole tree. If you enter a conflicted state while doing a merge, you can use git-checkout 's --theirs with a path to retrieve files from the index. Finally you can git-reset to force parts of the tree to a specific commit. There's now also http://www

We've got a sizable chunk of auto-generated code that we keep around in subversion. Sometimes I'm working on a piece of the generator while another coworker is working on a different piece of the generator. One of us checks in, and the other gets the latest. Now our generated code is in conflict. Because it's generated it'll be correct after the next time the generator is run, but subversion has flagged it as conflicted. It's a bit of a pain to go around, find these conflicts, verify that they are indeed due to generated code, and then manually "accept mine" to clear the conflicts. Is there a

I'm merging upstream changes to my project, and recently there were a lot of commits that created a lot of merge conflicts. It doesn't make sense to try to resolve them all at once. How can I find out which commits create a conflict? Any of the following are acceptable: A way to make Git stop merging as soon as it finds a conflict A way to make Git list all the commits that conflicted, in chronological order Anything else that lets me resolve the conflicts one-by-one, in chronological order, that doesn't involve merging a few commits at a time hoping to stumble upon the conflicts You can gives

I know I should be working on a branch of my own but a couple of us are on the same branch of a project. One of the Dev's made a commit and I just wanted to update my local copy with the latest from SVN. Running 'svn update' I get this output: Restored 'index.html' U somescript.php Conflict discovered in file.xml'. Select: (p) postpone, (df) diff-full, (e) edit, (mc) mine-conflict, (tc) theirs-conflict, (s) show all options: Is there an option/way to overwrite my local changes and get the latest file(s) from subversion and ignore all the conflicts? I've looked at some of the other posts on