conflict

HELP! I'm building the front end of a website and I'm using dropzone.js for image uploads. Now I've included the dropzone.min.js and the dropzone.css in the head and I asigned the dropzone class to the tag i wanted to convert. Despite this the form field isn't made into a dropzone field. Dropping images on the field results in the browser just showing only the image like it would usually do. I use a lot of different jquery or javascript plug ins so maybe there's something causing a conflict? Firebug console says: Uncaught Error: No URL provided. If you guys could help me out on this one it

When I open two Wicket web applications in the same browser, it seems there are AJAX conflicts as I see a full page refresh in place of a partial refresh. This is true even if the applications are on different servers and port numbers. I only use the out-of-the-box JavaScript provided by Wicket ( tabbedPanel , onTimerAutoRefresh ). Perhaps it is something related to the fallback function. When only one web application is open, it works without any problems. I don't have a problem on the examples site, so I think something is wrong with the configuration of my application. wicket-ajax.js , line

Following on the scenario from this question, I'm performing a git rebase -s recursive -X theirs etc... and am surprised to be stopped with the following types of conflicts: added by them deleted by them deleted by us Is there some reason the strategy doesn't cope with these? (I don't know if this is significant, but git doesn't report conflicts in the output, it just says When you have resolved this problem run "git rebase --continue" ) UPDATE Here's a script that doesn't quite reproduce, but nearly: git init git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/Branch1 #just to get the 'right' branch name echo

When I have several conflicts, is there a way to resolve them all by just telling SVN to keep the version that is in the repository? Unfortunately, we're still using 1.4. I believe if you run the command svn revert . -R , you basically undo all changes to your working copy. If there are conflicted files, SVN tosses out your changes and uses the revision you've most recently updated to. Of course, this also gets rid of changes to files that aren't conflicted. svn update . --accept theirs-full Or is that not available in svn 1.4? You could try and run the 1.5 client against a 1.4 server, might

Here is the following code on my website which is under my < head > tag. There is a conflict between the jQuery file used for the "Banner Code" and the jQuery used for "Sticky navigation" as depicted below: <!--Banner Code--> <script type='text/javascript' src='js/banner/jquery.min.js'></script><!--older version jQuery--> <script type='text/javascript' src='js/banner/jquery.mobile.customized.min.js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='js/banner/jquery.easing.1.3.js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='js/banner/camera.min.js'></script> <script> jQuery(document).ready

I look at a merge marker that looked all screwed up. To give you the situation lets have this: public void methodA() { prepare(); try { doSomething(); } catch(Exception e) { doSomethingElse(); } } Now comes in a merge (I use SourceTree for pull). And the marker looks like this: <<<<<<<<< HEAD try { doSomething(); } catch(Exception e) { doSomethingElse(); } ============================ private void methodB() { doOtherStuff(); >>>>>>>> 9832432984384398949873ab } So what the pulled commit does is removing the methodA completely and adding methodB instead. But you notice that there are some lines