conflict

Here is a lot of what I'm getting: <<<<<<< HEAD code ======= >>>>>>> Merge branch 'master' of code_url into not_master and there are tons of those occurring multiple times in 40+ files. Is there a different way to merge such that it correctly resolves conflicts on its own? I feel like whenever it encounters any simultaneous difference in a location a file, git decides to flip ALL THE TABLES. (╯°□°）╯︵ buıbɹǝɯ ʇıb I looked at rebase, and it MAY have been what I have needed when I started the branch. To start rebasing - I still need to deal with all these conflicts. I've often seen this when git

I use jqZoom and Bootstrap on my webpage, and Bootstrap breaks the zooming of jqZoom as described in JqZoom and Twitter Bootstrap Conflict I also applied the fix of setting ´max-width:none´ for the zoomable image. This solved the problem in some cases. But if the large image is really large, the zoom behaves as if only a part of the image were present. It seems that it fails to adjust the lense according to size of the image. How can I fix this? You can see the effect in the following two links. They display two images each. The first one works nice in both cases. The second one only without

I am trying to work out a method of sharing merge conflicts with other members of my team. We have some very large branches and merging them creates a lot of conflicts. I have tried several different methods, and my current attempt involves pushing the files in a conflicted state to the remote repo (leaving the merge markers in the files), and then running an annoyingly long alias to grep through the files and re-create the merge files manually (LOCAL, BASE, REMOTE). I recently found the git checkout --conflict=merge -- (file) command, which works great on a local branch, but as soon as it