compatibility

问题 I know that you can't (at least not easily) restore a SQL Server 2012 backup on SQL Server 2008. But how does it work for SQL Server 2014 to SQL Server 2012 ? On database level there is the property to adjust the compatibility mode to any other SQL Server version. How does this helps or work ? Will it only disallow the features from 2014? To be honest I already tried to restore a backup, but 2012 didn't recognize the datafile, so I couldn't click ok Button to start the restore procedure. Did

问题 According to BOL (SQL Server Books Online) on sp_dbcmptlevel, This feature will be removed in a future version of Microsoft SQL Server. Do not use this feature in new development work, and modify applications that currently use this feature as soon as possible. Use ALTER DATABASE Compatibility Level instead. Now, the only TSQL way I know of checking database compatibility is through sp_dbcmptlevel . As far as I know, ALTER DATABASE Compatibility Level is just for setting the compatibility

问题 I'm making an application with Swift 2.1, Xcode 7.1.1. I want it to be at least compatible with iPhone 4S and 5C. I configured my project settings with armv7 architecture, info.plist, but when I publish my build, I only have arm64 defined in iTunes connect. Where do I have to configure it correctly ? 回答1: Make sure Build Active Architecture Only is set to NO (at least for release), or else it will use the architecture of the connected device at the time you create the build. 回答2: please

问题 I'm making an application with Swift 2.1, Xcode 7.1.1. I want it to be at least compatible with iPhone 4S and 5C. I configured my project settings with armv7 architecture, info.plist, but when I publish my build, I only have arm64 defined in iTunes connect. Where do I have to configure it correctly ? 回答1: Make sure Build Active Architecture Only is set to NO (at least for release), or else it will use the architecture of the connected device at the time you create the build. 回答2: please

问题 My website is broken in IE11. We all know that HTML tags allow developer to force IE compatibility mode; in example <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8, IE=9" /> worked great and solved the visualization problems for IE10. But actually on IE11, even if Compatibility mode is set to IE9 , User agent string is set to default and javascript doesn't work. Changing manually User agent string to IE10 solved my problems. For shure I'm going to solve the real problems that cause website

问题 For my Android-app I'm using the ABI "x86" and "armeabi" right now. The armeabi is used for all ARM-devices, including armv7a and arm64-v8a. Now I would like to remove the "armeabi" and just continue with "x86" and "armeabi-v7a". I haven't found any hint in the docs, that ARMv8 is also compatible with ARMv7 - can anyone confirm that my app will still work on devices running arm64-v8a, if I don't offer an armeabi but now an armeabi-v7a-library? 回答1: Many modern Android devices (i.e. Nexus 5x)

问题 I'm working on a certain C++ library (or more framework). I want to make it backward compatible with previous versions preserving not only API compatibility but also ABI (like the great job Qt does). I use lots of functionality of Boost and it seems for me that this makes backward compatibility just impossible, unless I force a user to have exactly the same (sometimes old) version of Boost. Is there any way (without rewriting 1/2 of Boost) to make some "prefix" around its namespace/rename it

问题 I have Internet Explorer installed on my computer but needed to test compatibility mode of IE 7. After changing the document mode to IE 7, it set it as default and now I can't change it. The default is stuck on IE 7? How do I set Document mode default? 回答1: The rendering mode in Internet Explorer 11 can appear stuck if the site is added to your local Compatibility View list. When this happens, the rendering mode inside the developer tools and out will default to the specified compatibility

问题 First, I have read the following: Connect case VS case and especially this channel9 post So, from the last bullet, I really think there is no way around this, but I had to see if I could get a definitive answer as my team would like to upgrade from .NET 4.0 to .NET 4.5. However, we have to support XP. Is there no possibility of going to .NET 4.5 if we want to support XP? The only thing I could think of is creating two separate solutions, but then the codebases would have to diverge if we used

问题 First, I have read the following: Connect case VS case and especially this channel9 post So, from the last bullet, I really think there is no way around this, but I had to see if I could get a definitive answer as my team would like to upgrade from .NET 4.0 to .NET 4.5. However, we have to support XP. Is there no possibility of going to .NET 4.5 if we want to support XP? The only thing I could think of is creating two separate solutions, but then the codebases would have to diverge if we used