comments

In Visual Studio, is there a way to word-wrap ONLY comments?

让人想犯罪 __ 提交于 2019-12-05 12:24:35
问题 I've looked, but it doesn't look like you can apply specific formatting to just comments. 回答1: Well, there is an Add-In which will automatically format your comments to a given width (as a side feature). It is HyperAddIn - the main feature of which is allowing you to create 'hyperlinks' to other places in your code within comments, like this: // The other half of this logic is in code:ComponentManager.Initialise() With HyperAddIn installed, the code:ComponentManager.Initialise() becomes a

How do I write in-code comments and documentation in a proper way? Is there any standard for this? [closed]

依然范特西╮ 提交于 2019-12-05 12:06:51
I want to add documentation in my code by means of comment lines. Is there any standard format for this? For example, consider the code below: class Arithmetic { // This method adds two numbers, and returns the result. // dbNum1 is the first number to add, and dbNum2 is second. // The returning value is dbNum1+dbNum2. static double AddTwoNumbers(double dbNum1, double dbNum2); } For this example code, is there any better way of writing the comment lines? For c++ there isn't a standard, like javadoc, but certain documentation tools are popular and common to use. Off the top of my head, I can

Multiline comment in Elixir

余生颓废 提交于 2019-12-05 11:58:09
问题 Most languages allow block comments, and multiline commands. For example, a multiline comment in HTML looks like the following: <!-- Warning, brave programmer: Here be dragons. --> In Elixir, the closest thing I have found is as follows: http://elixir-lang.org/docs/v1.0/eex/ EEx smartengine <% #comments %> seem to be discarded from source, even if they are multiline. However, this is just a workaround. Does Elixir have a multiline comment feature, or a way to instruct the compiler to discard

Detecting typos in JavaScript code

纵然是瞬间 提交于 2019-12-05 11:51:09
In Python world, one of the most widely-used static code analysis tools, pylint has a special check , that detects typos in comments and docstrings. Is there a way to detect typos in JavaScript code using static code analysis? To make the question more specific, here is an example code I want to cause a warning: // enter credntials and log in scope.loginPage.logIn(browser.params.regularUser.login, browser.params.regularUser.password); Here credntials is misspelled. There is a eslint plugin built specifically for the task - eslint-plugin-spellcheck : eslint plugin to spell check words on

PHP/MySQL: How to create a comment section in your website [closed]

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-05 11:46:33
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center . Closed 7 years ago . Instead of asking 'how to use PHP/MySQL to let users affect webpages' I'll ask this, because I learn better from projects and examples. So how would I incorporate a VERY basic comment feature using PHP and MySQL? It's a hard question to answer without more information. There are a number of things you should

XCode automatically generated comments?

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-12-05 11:41:51
Every time when I create a new file in XCode, it makes some comment at the top of the file. Recently it has changed somehow - I dont know why and how to reset this. Its now like this: // // [Filename.cpp] // [Projectname] // // Created by [Name] on [Date] // Copyright 2011 [Company]. All rights reserved. // But was first like this: /* * [Filename.cpp] * [Projectname] * * Created by [Name] on [Date] * Copyright 2011 [Company]. All rights reserved. * */ So is there some setting, where I can reset this style of auto generated comments? Where I can I change this? On a default installation, the

Multiple @ JS Comment bug in IE

拜拜、爱过 提交于 2019-12-05 11:26:56
I've come across a bug/undocumented feature in IE 7, 6.5 (perhaps others?). This doesn't effect Opera (10.5x) Firefox (3.5.x) or likely any other browser (this is all I've tested so far). It doesn't seem to be a documented ability of Javascript. By including a comment denoted by double slashes, and directly followed by double at signs ( //@@ ), the whole .js file is rendered useless. I've checked several variations and here's what I've found (where fail=JS isn't loaded, pass=JS is loaded): fail: //@@ fail: //@ @ fail: //@@@ - any number of @ doesn't seem to make a difference fail: //@@ text -

How can you keep yaml-cpp parser from stripping out all comments?

佐手、 提交于 2019-12-05 10:26:25
I have a project that needs to read a well documented yaml file, modify a couple of values, and write it back out. The trouble is that yaml-cpp completely strips out all comments and "eats" them. The interesting thing is that the YAML::Emitter class allows one to add comments to the output. Is there a way to preserve the comments in the input and write them back in the library that I'm not seeing? Because as it stands right now, I can't see any way using the YAML::Parser class (which uses the YAML::Scanner class, where the comments themselves are actually "eaten"). According to the YAML spec

make my file readable as either Perl or HTML

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-12-05 10:14:02
In the spirit of the " Perl Preamble " where a script works properly whether executed by a shell script interpreter or the Perl interpreter... I have a Perl script which contains an embedded HTML document (as a "heredoc"), i.e.: #!/usr/bin/perl ... some Perl code ... my $html = <<'END' ; <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> ... more HTML ... </HTML> END ... Perl code that processes $html ... I would like to be able to work on the HTML that's inside the Perl script and check it out using a web browser, and only run the script when the HTML is the way I

why # followed by a number seems do nothing in C plus plus

心已入冬 提交于 2019-12-05 09:49:16
Repro steps: insert the following line into any line of your c++ source code. #1234 Any line including the first line, the last line. Even you can input between function header and body like this. int foo() #1234 { return 0; } The number can be very long, I tested more than 170 characters. If you add any non-numeric character, you will get an compile error. My question is: why # followed by a number doesn't break the compile, while # followed by a non-numeric character does. Thanks for your time, everyone. That is a line directive. Most preprocessors output these to tell the compiler which