code-formatting

问题 I am using Android Studio and having an issue when formatting the code. When there is a statement that breaks into multiple lines and I need to format that to a single line statement, I can't do it using (Ctrl+Alt+L). The code didn't format to a single line using that shortcut. I tried changing the value of Right margin (Settings -> Editor -> Code Style) to a higher number, but that also didn't work. How to format the code to a single line? Thanks. 回答1: First go to Preferences > Editor > Code

问题 I would like to re-factor various blocks of code throughout a project using ReSharper 7.1 Search / Replace with pattern. The code blocks are similar to the following simplified example: someControl.StatusProgressBar.IsIndeterminate = false; someControl.StatusProgressBar.Visibility = Visibility.Visible; someControl.StatusProgressBar.Minimum = 0; someControl.StatusProgressBar.Maximum = 100; someControl.StatusProgressBar.Value = percentage; And I would like to change them to: someControl

问题 So how can I still be able to write beautiful code such as: 'im a string meing!'.pop Note: str.chop isn't sufficient answer 回答1: It is not what an enumerable string atually enumerates. Is a string a sequence of ... lines, characters, codepoints or bytes? The answer is: all of those, any of those, either of those or neither of those, depending on the context. Therefore, you have to tell Ruby which of those you actually want. There are several methods in the String class which return

问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 3 years ago . Our team has recently inherited code which is extremely disorganized. As a result, my team leader has decided to enforce a policy of auto-formating of code prior to saving a file. We have even found an option in Eclipse (The IDE of our choice) that auto-formats the code

问题 Historically, I like to break expressions so that the "it's clearly incomplete" bias is shown on the continued line: var something = foo + bar + baz(mumble); This is an attitude that comes from working in languages which need semicolons to terminate expressions. The first line is already obviously incomplete due to no-semicolon, so it's better to make it clear to the reader that the second line is not complete. The alternative would be: var something = foo + bar + baz(mumble); That's not as

问题 This question was migrated from Software Engineering Stack Exchange because it can be answered on Stack Overflow. Migrated 7 years ago . I got used to use Ctrl + k , Ctrl + d for formatting whole document while in Visual Studio 2010 C# but when I changed C++ I realise that it's no longer available. To format the document I have to select a piece of code and use Ctrl + k , Ctrl + f to format the selected code. Can someone tell me how to enable Ctrl + k , Ctrl + d ? Is it possible ? 回答1: Ctrl +

问题 After reading Hidden Features and Dark Corners of C++/STL on comp.lang.c++.moderated , I was completely surprised that the following snippet compiled and worked in both Visual Studio 2008 and G++ 4.4. Here's the code: #include <stdio.h> int main() { int x = 10; while (x --> 0) // x goes to 0 { printf("%d ", x); } } I'd assume this is C, since it works in GCC as well. Where is this defined in the standard, and where has it come from? 回答1: --> is not an operator. It is in fact two separate

问题 for example, I have something like this: aVarible = 123; bIndex = 234; cSomethingVerylong = 456; And I would like to intent the code like this: aVarible = 123; bIndex = 234; cSomethingVerylong = 456; How can I do so? Thank you. 回答1: You could use uncrustify: http://uncrustify.sourceforge.net/ I don't use it, so I cannot vouch for its quality, but it does claim to do exactly what you suggest in your question. If that's all you want to do, it's probably overkill, but if you want to "tidy" your

问题 private int _myField; public int MyField { get { return _myField * 99; } set { _myField * value; } } I've seen developers add more complex code into the Getter, setting other members and properties etc. To me return a value other than the associated member variable causes debugging confusion. IS this better? private int _myField; public int MyField { get { return _myField = _myField * 99; } set { _myField * value; } } or this? private int _myField; public int MyField { get { return _myField;

问题 What's the difference between these two methods of reading an input file? 1) Using 'ifstream.get()' and 2) Using a vector<char> with ifstreambuf_iterator<char> (less understood by me!) (other than the obvious answer of having nifty vector methods to work with) The input file is XML, and as you see below, immediately parsed into a rapidxml document. (initialized elsewhere, see example main function.) First, let me show you two ways to write the 'load_config' function, one using ifstream.get()