checkstyle

We are introducing static analysis tools into the build system for our Java product. We are using Maven2 so Checkstyle and PMD integration come for free. However it looks like there is a large overlap in functionality between these two tools, in terms of enforcing basic style rules. Is there a benefit from utilizing both of these? I don't want to maintain 2 tools if one will work. If we choose one, which one should we use and why? We are also planning on using FindBugs. Are there other static analysis tools we should look at? Update: Consensus seems to be that PMD is preferred over CheckStyle.

I have one file which contains rules for the project. I want my unit tests methods to be allowed to have underscore in their names. Like myMethod_should_call_someClass_someMehod . Currently I have one configuration, which is applied to all files in the project. My question is it possible to somehow configure checkstyle, so, for example I specify specific rules for all files that are ending with *Test.java . Currently the only solution I found is to provide SuppressionFilter and exclude all files ending with *Test.java . But is there a way I could provide a different MethodNameCheck module with

I have a Maven 2 project and I want to configure my Checkstyle report plugin so that only some of my classes are analysed. I have found the maven.checkstyle.excludes property, but despite passing this as a command line parameter (using -D=maven.checkstyle.excludes=... ) I can't get it to work. I can't find anything on the Plugin documentation page. Ideally I want to be able to set this in the <configuration> section of my POM. Pascal Thivent If this question is about Maven 2, then the property is excludes and takes a comma-separated list of Ant patterns. So either pass this on the command line

I'm using Checkstyle and am getting an error about this method: public final String getAdmitCodeStatus() { return admitCodeStatus; } Here's the error I get: Method 'getAdmitCodeStatus' is not designed for extension - needs to be abstract, final, or empty. How is that method not compliant? Is there something I'm doing wrong that Checkstyle would bark at me about this method? It looks to be caused by the DesignForExtension rule. According to the documentation : Checks that classes are designed for extension. More specifically, it enforces a programming style where superclasses provide empty

源程序链接：https://github.com/chinayixia/splitercontainer_20190819.git 效果图： splitercontainer 控件: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; using System.Drawing; using System.ComponentModel; namespace wf_foh100_demotool_release { [ToolboxBitmap(typeof(SplitContainer))] public class SplitContainerEx : SplitContainer { enum MouseState { /// <summary> /// 正常 /// </summary> Normal, /// <summary> /// 鼠标移入 /// </summary> Hover } public SplitContainerEx() { this.SetStyle( ControlStyles.UserPaint | ControlStyles.AllPaintingInWmPaint |

I have a checkstyle configuration XML file and want to automatically generate an Eclipse formatter configuration from this. Is there any tool that can do this? Paul In Eclipse (3.6): Install Checkstyle plug-in Import stylesheet using Windows --> Preferences, General --> Checkstyle --> New. Since you have an external file, choose "external file" as the type. Right-click on your project in the Package view and select Checkstyle --> Create Formatter-Profile. Then enable the formatter for your workspace: Windows --> Preferences --> Java --> Code Style --> Formatter. Select formatter: "eclipse-cs

I am trying to use the eclipse-cs plugin on Rational Software Architect 7.0.0.4. I recently uninstalled the older beta2 version and installed beta3. The plug-in itself works as was previously configured. But whenever I attempt to re-configure the check rules via Windows->Preferences->Checkstyle, I get the following error: Problems occurred when invoking code from plug-in: "org.eclipse.jface". This occurs when I click the configure button and attempt to reconfigure a specific selected check rule on the UI. Has anyone ever encountered this issue before and how can it be fixed? The full error

Are there any shell (specifically bash or ksh) checkers that test shell scripts for style, best practices, naming conventions, etc? (Something like Lint for C, or Perl::Critic for Perl.) I know with ksh you can do syntax checking by running ksh -n script.ksh but I was hoping for something more than just sytax checking - something that parses/analyzes the actual code? I'm probably out of luck, but I guess it doesn't hurt to ask. Brian Campbell The Debian and Ubuntu projects use a script checkbashisms , that looks for particular patterns that might indicate that someone is relying on /bin/sh