cdata

Gurus, I am self taught. There's a lot of what you enlightened ones call basic I know nothing about. Reading this jQuery Tutorial , I noticed this tag (for lack of better word): "CDATA" as shown here (third line from the top): <script src="http://jquery.com/src/jquery-latest.js"></script> <script> //<![CDATA[ $(document).ready(function(){ $(".article .thebody").hide(); $("#container .article ul") .prepend("<li class='readbody'><a href='' title='Read the article'>Read Body</a></li>"); $(".actions li.readbody a").click(function(event){ $(this).parents("ul").prev(".thebody").toggle(); event

Unfortunately, there is no CDATA in HTML. This is a pity, because it would be perfect for adding javadoc comments that include XML, so you don't have to escape the < and >, for example: /**<![CDATA[ This parses <complexType name=""> ]]>*/ However, it would be possible for javadoc to recognize the CDATA section, and convert it to HTML for you. For example: This parses <complexType name=""> Or it could use some simpler syntax than CDATA. Because javadoc is extensible, it's possible someone has added this functionality; or maybe javadoc already has it buried somewhere inside... Does anybody know?

I want to inline scripts or CSSs into XHTML without escaping special characters. I can do that using a CDATA marked section. According to http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.8 the CDATA section can be defined as: <script type="text/javascript"> <![CDATA[ ... unescaped script content ... ]]> </script> Then, according to http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/tag_script.asp , the CDATA can look like: <script type="text/javascript"><![CDATA[ // some code //]]></script> Which method for closing the CDATA section is better? ]]> or //]]> ? According to www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.8 the CDATA section can be

I'm pretty sure <![CDATA[...]]> sections can be used in XHTML5, but what about HTML5? The CDATA structure isn't really for HTML at all, it's for XML. People sometimes use them in HTML inside script tags because it removes the need for them to escape certain special characters. It’s by no means a requirement, though (for either HTML 4 or 5). Edit: This is where we open that really mouldy old can of worms from 2002 over whether you're sending XHTML as text/html or as application/xhtml+xml like you’re “supposed” to :-) Joel Purra From the same page @pst linked to : Element-specific parsing for

I'm reading a rss feed using simple code: <?php $homepage = file_get_contents('http://www.forbes.com/news/index.xml'); $movies = new SimpleXMLElement($homepage); echo '<pre>'; print_r($movies); ?> and the output like this: SimpleXMLElement Object ( [@attributes] => Array ( [version] => 2.0 ) [channel] => SimpleXMLElement Object ( [title] => SimpleXMLElement Object ( ) [link] => SimpleXMLElement Object ( ) [description] => SimpleXMLElement Object ( ) [language] => en-us [copyright] => Copyright 2009 Forbes.com LLC [item] => Array ( [0] => SimpleXMLElement Object ( [title] => SimpleXMLElement

I am creating an xml schema, and I want to make sure that the values in all the elements are CDATA elements. Is there a way to force this using XML-schema? As I recall XML Schema works on the XML Infoset, meaning with the XML document after it is parsed, entities are resolved, whitespace is normalised and CDATA is processed. CDATA is a way of easing the textual serialization not a part of the structural model. So: No. Neither in DTDs or RELAX NG. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/392770/force-use-of-cdata-in-xml-schema