c++-cli

What are the advantages (the list of possible disadvantages is lenghtly) of doing 100% managed development using C++/CLI (that is, compile with /clr:safe which "generates ... assemblies, like those written in ... C#")? Especially when compard to C# (note C++/CLI : Advantages over C# and Is there any advantage to using C++/CLI over either standard C++ or C#? are mostly about managed/unmanaged interop). For example, here are a few off the top of my head: C++-style references for managed types , not as elegant as full blown non-nullable references but better than nothing or using a work-around .

This apparently is a Google-proof term since I can't get any search engines to not throw away the "extra" characters. I did also look on MSDN in the C++ reference but I can't seem to find the C++/CLI reference because there is nothing in the declarations section on it. BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft % is a tracking reference . It is similar to a native reference ( Object& ), but a tracking reference can reference a CLR object while a native reference cannot. The distinction is necessary because the garbage collector can move CLR objects around, so a CLR-object's memory address may change. The ^

I have a large application written in native C++. I also have a class in C# that I need to call. If the C# class was static, then it would be trivial (there's lots of examples on the web) - just write the mixed C++/CLI wrapper, export the interfaces, and you're done. However, the C# class is non-static, and can't be changed to static as it has an interface (the compiler will generate an error if you attempt to make the C# class static). Has anyone run into this problem before - how do I export a non-static C# class to native C++? Update 2010-11-09 Final solution: tried COM, this worked nicely

I have the following code, which I thought would work: property Nullable<double> Angle { Nullable<double> get() { return nullptr; } } It doesn't. How can I do it? Does c++/CLI even support nullable types? OK, found it, after a lot of hassle: to return null, just do return Nullable<double>(); to return non-null: return Nullable<double>(12321); It is important to declare the return value as Nullable<double> and not Nullable<double>^ , as if you do it, when using other languages as C# and vb.net, you'll see the type as ValueType instead of double? . 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1457723