branching-and-merging

I have started doing some work on a branch which I have in term realised was the wrong branch. Is there a way to move a branch to a different branch. For example: A -- B -- C -- D -- HEAD \-- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J \-- K -- L And I want this: A -- B -- C -- D -- HEAD \ \-- K -- L \ \-- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J Let's say you've named your branches like so: A -- B -- C -- D (master) \-- E -- G -- H -- I -- J (current-parent) \-- K -- L (my-branch) What you want to do is rebase my-branch onto the B commit like so: git rebase current-parent my-branch --onto B You could use git rebase --onto

I'm working on a (Django) website with two branches: master and dev . master is the production version and no work should be done here directly. All the changes should come from merging dev branch, once it is considered to be stable. dev , as you may guess, is the development branch and all the changes are made here (and subbranches). In the server I have two websites working, the production one (uses master branch) and another private for development, with dev subdomain that uses dev branch. The problem is that all the configuration files, static files (images, etc.) are inside the control

I have a branch in SVN that I want to keep up to date with changes from the trunk. What I would like to do is have a script or something that runs nightly that does this merge and then commits the new version of the branch if there are no merge conflicts but if there are merge conflicts somehow indicate so. I found this post that is somewhat helpful although it doesn't do everything. I have been unable to find a way to determine whether there are merge conflicts and this is mostly what I'm looking for. Adding building the code and then committing on success will be easy enough in the script

I have trunk and a release branch. If I fixed a bug in release branch, I definitely should integrate the fix back to trunk. However, I didn't find a command dedicated to integrate such a single change list; did I miss something? To integrate changelist 100, for example, you'd use: p4 merge //releasebranch/...@=100 //trunk/... p4 resolve p4 submit (If you have an older Perforce server you'll have to use 'integ' instead of 'merge'.) Note that '@=100' means the same thing as '@100,100' in this context. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12106321/perforce-how-to-integrate-a-change-to-another

I would like to force other team-members to not work on the master-branch but on a development branch. we have a central git-repository where we push our work into. i would like to know if it's possible to block users from pushing changes to the master-branch but only allow certain users to do so. I would like to have the following "workflow" development is always only done with a development-branch the release-manager is responsible for the master branch and only he is allowed to merge stuff from a development branch into the master and push it to the master-branch on the central repository

Having two branches, how can I find the latest revision(s) where the two branches were merged? Is there a standard Mercurial command to do that? This is the same as question How to find the common ancestor of two branches in SVN? , but for Mercurial instead of subversion. I didn't understand why Lazy Badger's answer was the right one, so I had to make a little drawing, and now I get it: When two branches are merged, they are not really "merged", but the changes from one branch are integrated into a second branch. This means that the merge commit only belongs to the originating branch, and not

In a mercurial repo, the "default" branch has fallen very out of date to the point where it no longer makes sense to merge in the changes from "develop", a named branch which has the latest deployed version of the application. Instead of merging develop into default, how can I close the current default branch and then create a new default branch using the head from develop? I've seen a few other questions and answers which are similar, perhaps the same, but I am still having trouble understanding how this should work. Thanks! If default has diverged somewhat from develop and you want default

I'm trying to figure out how to merge branches from a separate repo into the current. I have the following: PJT1 - contains branches default and foodog PJT2 - contains branch default from PJT2, I do the following: $ hg fetch -y ../PJT1 -r foodog -m "this is a test" Now, if I look in PJT2, I see the correct files and changes. However, I if I do hg branches , I get the following: [someone@myhome pjt2]$ hg branches foodog 1:c1e14fde816b default 0:7b1adb938f71 (inactive) and hg branch reveals the following: [someone@myhome pjt2]$ hg branch foodog How do I get the contents from PJT1's foodog branch