azure-table-storage

How do SQL Azure and Azure Table Storage compare? [closed]

帅比萌擦擦* 提交于 2019-12-23 11:46:41
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 7 years ago . Currently I have a prototype that runs in IIS on my local machine and uses SQL Server Express 2005 for storing data in three SQL

Query other tables in insert function of Azure Table Storage

痞子三分冷 提交于 2019-12-23 04:49:19
问题 I am using Azure Table Storage to send out Push Notifications once a new item is inserted. Currently I am trying to query a second table to retrieve a string which I want to use for push notifications. I am quite new to Node.js so I worked through some code and tried the following to start a query on the TestTable to find the correct entity with based on TestProperty. Once I have found the correct entity I want to use a specific property from it to work on with. This is the error I get with

Alternative to Windows Azure tables out of the cloud

安稳与你 提交于 2019-12-22 14:05:13
问题 I'm developing a .NET app, which needs to run both on Azure and on regular Windows Servers(2003). It needs to store a few GB of data and SQL Azure is too expensive for me, so I'll use Azure tables in the cloud version. Can you recommend a storage solution, which will run on standalone servers and have an API and behavior similar to Azure tables? From what I've seen Server AppFabric does not include Tables. 回答1: If you think what Windows Azure Table Storage is, it is a Key-Value pair based non

Query multiple RowKeys in Azure

半腔热情 提交于 2019-12-22 12:39:37
问题 This post from 2010 says Query7: PartitionKey == "A" and (RowKey == "A" or RowKey == “F”) This results in scanning the entire Partition "A". Is this still the case for the current version of Azure? Should I prefer two parallel queries or the syntax above when my partition contains only ~20 rows? 回答1: I found an answer from Joe Giardino, Microsoft: If you want several non contiguous row keys, then issuing separate but parallel individual queries of below form will perform better. When you

Azure table storage - where clause on column that may not exist

风流意气都作罢 提交于 2019-12-22 06:57:51
问题 I am adding a new column to my azure table. For ex., the table is called 'User' and the new column is called 'ComputationDate'. The 'User' table already exists with rows that do not have this new column 'ComputationDate'. I have a query over it as follows, var usersDue = from user in Table.Query where user.ComputationDate != <somedate> select user; I want this query to return all user rows that do not have ComputationDate set to 'somedate' and also user rows that do not have this new

Automating Deployment in Bot Framework (Bot + LUIS+ QnA + Table Storage)

安稳与你 提交于 2019-12-22 06:49:52
问题 We have a bot deployed on Azure but we want to give it to a client so he can deploy it run it using his own resources. We need to give them a Powershell script that magically create and deploy all the resources needed for the bot to work. My bot architecture consists on the following parts: Bot's Logic (ASP.NET Web API Project deployed over an Azure App Service ) LUIS Model (published over a Cognitive Services Account ) QnA Service Knowledge Base done with QnA Maker ( published directly from

MongoLab vs Azure Table Storage

牧云@^-^@ 提交于 2019-12-22 06:47:14
问题 Take a 100gb database for this example: Azure Storage cost: £6.05/m MongoLab on AWS with 1 node cost: £153.18 /m Am I missing something? Calculated something incorrectly? Can someone clear things up for me here? I would much rather use MongoLab as I really like node/mongoDB. But it seems a much more cost effective solution to go with the Table Storage. I know the differences between Key/Value and Document store and I do prefer the latter. 回答1: You need to consider that Azure Table Storage

Is there a database agnostic nosql framework for .NET?

只谈情不闲聊 提交于 2019-12-22 05:43:07
问题 I'm looking for a common data access framework that will provide portability across various nosql databases like SimpleDB, Azure Tables, Cassandra, CouchDB, MongoDb, etc. I'm building an app and would like my customers to be able to use which ever nosql store they want. In a more relational scenario, I'd use Linq over nHibernate or Entity Framework, but I haven't found an equivalent framework for nosql databases. All I've found is database specific API's even though there seem to be

TableQuery<T> from Azure TableStorage that filters on PartitionKey

陌路散爱 提交于 2019-12-21 07:13:22
问题 I'm trying to abstract geting all entities from a Table by partitionKey, like so: public List<T> GetEntities<T>(string partitionKey, T entity) where T : TableEntity { try { var tableClient = _account.CreateCloudTableClient(); var table = tableClient.GetTableReference(entity.GetType().Name.ToLower()); var exQuery = new TableQuery<T>().Where(TableQuery.GenerateFilterCondition("PartitionKey", QueryComparisons.Equal, partitionKey)); var results = table.ExecuteQuery(exQuery).Select(ent => (T) ent)

TableQuery<T> from Azure TableStorage that filters on PartitionKey

不问归期 提交于 2019-12-21 07:13:08
问题 I'm trying to abstract geting all entities from a Table by partitionKey, like so: public List<T> GetEntities<T>(string partitionKey, T entity) where T : TableEntity { try { var tableClient = _account.CreateCloudTableClient(); var table = tableClient.GetTableReference(entity.GetType().Name.ToLower()); var exQuery = new TableQuery<T>().Where(TableQuery.GenerateFilterCondition("PartitionKey", QueryComparisons.Equal, partitionKey)); var results = table.ExecuteQuery(exQuery).Select(ent => (T) ent)