automapper

问题 I have two entities: Employee and Team . What I want is an EmployeeForm that has the Name of the Team . How can I achieve this using AutoMapper ? My current "solution" is the following: Mapper.CreateMap<Employee, EmployeeForm>() .ForMember(dest => dest.TeamName, opt => opt.MapFrom(x => x.GetTeams().FirstOrDefault() != null ? string.Join(", ", x.GetTeams().Select(y=>y.Name)) : "n/a")); In my opinion this is bad readable. What I would like to have is a generic method where I can pass an entity,

问题 i have been successfully working with linq2sql and the linq DTOs (the classes that are created by linq2sql) .... I am confused, i have the task of updating an old application and i can see that my DTOs will be used how they should be .... to transport date I am using the repository pattern so i am passing data from the repository to the service via the linq2sql dtos... once i am in the service layer (this is basically my business logic) then I need to pass around class objects .. these class

问题 i have been successfully working with linq2sql and the linq DTOs (the classes that are created by linq2sql) .... I am confused, i have the task of updating an old application and i can see that my DTOs will be used how they should be .... to transport date I am using the repository pattern so i am passing data from the repository to the service via the linq2sql dtos... once i am in the service layer (this is basically my business logic) then I need to pass around class objects .. these class

问题 Question : what is the best, efficient and future proof way to rehydrate an aggregate from a repository? What are the pro's and con's of the provided ways and are my perceptions correct? Let's say we have an Aggregate Root with private setters but public getters for accessing state Behaviour is done through methods on the aggregate root. A repository is instructed to load an aggregate. At the moment I see a couple of possible ways to achieve this: set the state through reflection (manual or

问题 Question : what is the best, efficient and future proof way to rehydrate an aggregate from a repository? What are the pro's and con's of the provided ways and are my perceptions correct? Let's say we have an Aggregate Root with private setters but public getters for accessing state Behaviour is done through methods on the aggregate root. A repository is instructed to load an aggregate. At the moment I see a couple of possible ways to achieve this: set the state through reflection (manual or

问题 DISCLAIMER: this is a copy paste from an older stackoverflow post that isn't available anymore, but I have exaclty the same problem, so it seemed appropriate to repost it as it was never answered. I have a stored procedure that will return 4 result sets (contacts, addresses, email, phones) which is populated into a dataset. I would like to use AutoMapper to populate a complex object. public class Contact { public Guid ContactId { get; set; } public string FirstName { get; set; } public string

问题 DISCLAIMER: this is a copy paste from an older stackoverflow post that isn't available anymore, but I have exaclty the same problem, so it seemed appropriate to repost it as it was never answered. I have a stored procedure that will return 4 result sets (contacts, addresses, email, phones) which is populated into a dataset. I would like to use AutoMapper to populate a complex object. public class Contact { public Guid ContactId { get; set; } public string FirstName { get; set; } public string

问题 I am trying to map a DataTable to an object (DTO) using AutoMappers DynamicMap feature. DataTable dt; dt = new dalAllInvestors().InvestorNameSearch(investorNameSearch); // Look at DynamicMap - Urgent List<dtoAPISimpleInvestor> apiObject = AutoMapper.Mapper.DynamicMap<IDataReader, List<dtoAPISimpleInvestor>>( dt.CreateDataReader()); return apiObject; public class dtoAPISimpleInvestor { public int FirmID { get; set; } public string FirmName { get; set; } public string Type { get; set; } public

问题 Let's assume I have three classes that are subclasses of a base class: public class BaseClass { public string BaseName { get; set; } } public class Subclass1 : BaseClass { public string SubName1 { get; set; } } public class Subclass2 : BaseClass { public string SubName2 { get; set; } } public class Subclass3 : BaseClass { public string SubName3 { get; set; } } I would like to map these to a ViewModel class that looks like this: public class ViewModel { public string BaseName { get; set; }

问题 I need to use a service layer in the AutoMapper profile class in ASP.NET Core but when I inject service in the constructor it does not work. For example: public class UserProfile : Profile { private readonly IUserManager _userManager; public UserProfile(IUserManager userManager) { _userManager = userManager; CreateMap<User, UserViewModel>() .ForMember(dest => dest.FullName, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => $"{src.FirstName} {src.LastName}")); } } And in Startup Class: public class Startup { public