assert

Tensorflow Invalid Argument: Assertation Failed [Label IDs must < n_classes]

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 10:24:21
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I get an error implementing a DNNClassifier in Tensorflow 1.3.0 with Python 2.7. I got the sample code from the Tensorflow tf.estimator Quickstart Tutorial and I want to run it with my own dataset: 3D coordinates and 10 different classes (int labels). Here is my implementation: #!/usr/bin/env python # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- def ReadLabels(file): #load the labels from test file here labelFile = open(file, "r") Label = labelFile.readlines(); returnL = [[Label[i][j+1] for j in range(len(Label[0])-3)] for i in range(len(Label))] returnLint = list

LightOpenID - Provider issued an assertion for an Identifier whose discovery info did not match

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 09:52:54
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: This is the error I get after logging into Stack with my LightOpenID provider script. The OpenID Provider issued an assertion for an Identifier whose discovery information did not match. Assertion endpoint info : ClaimedIdentifier : http : //sub.mydomain.net/?cgillis ProviderLocalIdentifier : http : //sub.mydomain.net/?cgillis ProviderEndpoint : http : //sub.mydomain.net/ OpenID version : 2.0 Service Type URIs : Discovered endpoint info : [{ ClaimedIdentifier : http : //specs.openid.net/auth/2.0/identifier_select

How to align codes in emacs C++ mode to “;” or “,”?

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 08:51:18
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: As a test engineer, I often have some spaghetti code like below: int *const cpe = &n; assert(42 == *cpe); int *const cpf = &cn; assert(42 == *cpf); int *const cpg = pcn; assert(42 == *cpg); int *const cph = cpcn; assert(42 == *cph); For aesthetics, I would like to align them in columns defined by " ; ", like below: int *const cpe = &n; assert(42 == *cpe); int *const cpf = &cn; assert(42 == *cpf); int *const cpg = pcn; assert(42 == *cpg); int *const cph = cpcn; assert(42 == *cph); Is there a way in emacs to do this? (I know M-x align but it

Programmatically verify a X509 certificate and private key match

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 08:46:08
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I created an RSA key pair using the EVP_aes_256_cbc() cipher. The private key is PEM encoded and has a passphrase. This requires a passphrase to be entered by the user. Here's the create private key call: //Save private key bio_priv = BIO_new_file(full_asymKeyFilePath.c_str(), "a+"); if (PEM_write_bio_RSAPrivateKey( bio_priv, //BIO handle rsa, //Key handle EVP_aes_256_cbc(), //Cipher encoding format pwd, //Password pwd_len, //Password length NULL, //Callback NULL //Not sure ) != 1) { //report err } Then I generated a certificate and signed

TensorFlow has no attribute “with_dependencies”

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 08:46:08
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I want to use the tf.with_dependencies function to save the state of my RNNs. For some reason I get the following error. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/chase/workspace/AudioRNN/audiornn.py", line 56, in <module> tf.with_dependencies([expected_output], input_tensor) AttributeError: module 'tensorflow' has no attribute 'with_dependencies' The rest of my tensorflow code runs fine. I am in eclipse and with I Ctrl+Click on tf.with_dependencies it takes me to the source code. I noticed that the tf.group function is also in this

Unit testing and assert case for void method

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 08:42:37
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I'm trying to create some unit testing for a void method. Basically the method is intended to show the role of a system user and implement it within the software. This is the method: public void setPersonObj(Person typeObj) { this.typeObj = typeObj; createMain(); } How would I create an assert case in a separate class that uses unit testing to check this method? Many thanks 回答1: If the method is void it clearly has some side-effects. Otherwise it would be a no-op. So you have no choice and need to validate these side-effects. How to test

junit assert in thread throws exception

僤鯓⒐⒋嵵緔 提交于 2019-12-03 08:33:29
问题 What am I doing wrong that an exception is thrown instead of showing a failure, or should I not have assertions inside threads? @Test public void testComplex() throws InterruptedException { int loops = 10; for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++) { final int j = i; new Thread() { @Override public void run() { ApiProxy.setEnvironmentForCurrentThread(env);//ignore this new CounterFactory().getCounter("test").increment();//ignore this too int count2 = new CounterFactory().getCounter("test").getCount();/

How does C# compiler remove Debug.Assert's in release builds?

帅比萌擦擦* 提交于 2019-12-03 08:24:29
问题 I was recently going through some code and considering whether I need to be careful with the expressions placed inside Debug.Assert statements, such as expensive operations or those with side effects. However, it appears the compiler is pretty smart about completely removing the Assert statement and inner expressions. For example, the following will only print on debug builds: static void Main(string[] args) { Debug.Assert(SideEffect()); } private static bool SideEffect() { Console.WriteLine(

What are acceptable use-cases for python's `assert` statement?

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-12-03 08:16:45
问题 I often use python's assert statement to check user input and fail-fast if we're in a corrupt state. I'm aware that assert gets removed when python with the -o (optimized) flag. I personally don't run any of my apps in optimized mode, but it feels like I should stay away from assert just in-case. It feels much cleaner to write assert filename.endswith('.jpg') than if not filename.endswith('.jpg'): raise RuntimeError Is this a valid use case for assert? If not, what would a valid use-case for

Should one leave asserts in production iOS apps?

时光怂恿深爱的人放手 提交于 2019-12-03 07:37:50
Common practice might be to put asserts in code to check input parameters, data integrity, and such, during app development. I test my apps, BUT, given that I'm not Knuth (and he writes $1 checks), and I can't afford to employ a large team of full-time QA people as do some medical and space systems software companies, I assume that all apps will always have plenty of bugs that have never yet been seen during testing or QA. Assuming otherwise seems quite intellectually dishonest. So after testing an app (and obviously removing all bugs causing any previously seen ASSERT failures) and getting