asp.net-mvc-5

I have two models: public class User { ..... public virtual UserProfile UserProfile { get; set;} } public class UserProfile { ..... public virtual User User { get; set;} } The User is the master table and the relation is one to one. One user has only one UserProfile. How can I define the relationship between User and UserProfile using EF CodeFirst Fluent API in such a way that when I delete one user from User table the user profile from Userprofile is also deleted? Use WillCascadeOnDelete modelBuilder.Entity<UserProfile>() .HasKey(c => c.Id) .HasRequired(c => c.User) .WithRequiredDependent(c =

I have ASP.Net MVC 5 application I want to call a method from view how can I do it? my code: My UsersList function: public ActionResult UsersList() { var User_VM = new UserVM { MyUsers = context.Users.OrderBy(u => u.Email).Include(u => u.Roles).ToList() }; return View(User_VM); } UsersList View: @foreach(var user in Model.MyUsers) { <tr> <td>@user.Email</td> <td> @foreach(var r in user.Roles) { <p> @Html.Action(GetRoleNameById(r.RoleId)) </p> } </td> </tr> } and my function in controller: public ActionResult GetRoleNameById(string RoleId) { var RoleName = context.Roles.Where(r => r.Id ==

I have the following model public class EmailLinkModel { public string mailbody { get; set; } public string emailSubject { get; set; } public string emailto { get; set; } } mailbody contains the actual text which is a part of mail body. This text contains a long text [ contains special characters like ? < etc and can contain line breaks spaces etc] I want to create a mailto html tag in the partial view and i tried 3 different approaches and at some point my mailto link not opening the default mail client I think the reason was Html or Url ecnoding [ I am showing the mailbody content in a text

After downloading ASP.NET MVC 5.x template, I update the connection string, restore NuGet packages and then try to run Update-Database command in Package Manager Console, but I consistently get the following error: Could not load file or assembly 'Castle.Core, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=407dd0808d44fbdc' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040) I was able to solve this once by removing all packages and adding them back one at a time, but this is extremely time

I'm trying to create an attribute that can validate a complex type both on the server and client side. This attribute will be used for required and non required complex types such as the following Address Class public partial class AddressViewModel { [DisplayName("Address 1")] [MaxLength(100)] public virtual string Address1 { get; set; } [DisplayName("Address 2")] [MaxLength(100)] public virtual string Address2 { get; set; } [MaxLength(100)] public virtual string City { get; set; } [MaxLength(50)] public virtual string State { get; set; } [MaxLength(10)] [DisplayName("Postal Code")] public

I'm trying to inject this user service via Unity (mvc5) in an actionfilter but it is null. How can I implement this? public class TestFilter : ActionFilterAttribute { // this is always null [Dependency] public IUserService UserService { get; set; } // other members } You must register UnityFilterAttributeFilterProvider as a FilterProvider first. Modify the App_Start > UnityMvcActivator 's Start method like this: public static void Start() { var container = UnityConfig.GetConfiguredContainer(); FilterProviders.Providers.Remove(FilterProviders.Providers.OfType<FilterAttributeFilterProvider>()

My project is missing the web.config file from the Views folder. Here are the steps I took to make the project. Created an empty MVC project and installed the packages listed below. Created a controller and view. The view was created by right-clicking the action name and selecting 'Add View...' from the menu. Attempt to run the project, but got the error CS0103: The name 'ViewBag' does not exist in the current context I am getting this error because web.config is missing from my Views folder. Since the web.config contains a lot of version numbers, tokens, etc..., my question is: Why wasn't